The dynamics of length change in canine vocal folds

Journal of Voice

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 267-276

  Titze, Ingo R ^a,c   Jiang, Jack J ^a,b   Lin, Emily ^b  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Canine; Length; Pitch; Vocal fold

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; FEMALE; LARYNX MUSCLE; MALE; MUSCLE EXCITATION; NERVE STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; PHONETICS; RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE; SUPERIOR LARYNGEAL NERVE; VOCAL CORD;

EID: 0030883504     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(97)80004-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Titze IR. Mechanisms underlying the control of fundamental frequency. In: Gauffin J, Hammarberg B, eds. Vocal Fold Physiology: Acoustic Perceptual and Physiological Aspects of Voice Mechanisms. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc., 1991;129-38.
2. Hollien H. Vocal pitch variation related to changes in vocal fold length. J Speech Hear Res 1960;3:150-6.
3. Nishizawa N, Sawashima M, Yonemoto K. Vocal fold length in vocal pitch change. In: Fujimura O, ed. Vocal Physiology: Voice Production, Mechanisms and Functions. New York: Raven Press, 1988;75-82.
4. Ohala J, Ewan W. Speed of pitch change. J Acous Soc Am 1973;53:345A.
5. Sundberg J. Maximum speed of pitch changes in singers and untrained subjects. J Phonetics 1979;7:71-9.
6. Alipour-Haghighi F, Titze I. Stress relaxation in vocal fold tissues. Advances in Bioengineering BED-17 Amer. Soc. Mech. Eng. New York, N.Y., 1990;21-4.
7. Cooper D, Partridge L, Alipour-Haghighi F. Muscle energetics, vocal efficiency, and laryngeal biomechanics. In: Titze, I. Vocal Fold Physiology: Frontiers in Basic Science. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, Inc., 1993;37-92
8. Hirano M. Phonosurgery: Basic and clinical investigations. Otologia (Fukuoka) 1975;Suppl 1, 239-419.
9. Titze I, Jiang J, Druker D. Preliminaries to the body-cover theory of pitch control. J Voice 1988;1:314-9.
10. Alipour-Haghighi F, Titze IR, Perlman A. Tetanic contraction in vocal fold muscle. J Speech Hear Res 1989;32:226-31.
11. Cooper DS, Shindo M, Sinka U, Hast MH, Rice DH. (1994) Dynamic properties of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 1994; 103:937-44.
12. Berke G, Moor D, Hanson D, Hantke D, Gerratt B, Burstein F. Laryngeal modeling: Theoretical, in vitro, in vivo. Laryngoscope 1987;97:871-81.
13. Berke G, Moore D, Gerratt B, Hanson D, Bell T, Natividad M. The effect of recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation on phonation in an in vivo canine model. Laryngoscope 1989;99:977-82.
14. Berke G, Green D, Smith M, Arnstein D, Honrubia V, Natividad M. Experimental evidence in the in vivo canine for the collapsible tube model of phonation. J Acous Soc Am 1991;89:1358-63.
15. Bielamowicz S, Berke G, Watson D, Gerratt B, Kreiman J. Effects of RLN and SLN stimulation on glottal area. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;110:370-80.
16. Titze IR, Luschei ES, Hirano M. The role of the thyroarytenoid muscle in regulation of fundamental frequency. J Voice 1989;3:213-24.
17. Solomon NP, Luschei ES, Liu K. Fundamental frequency and tracheal pressure during three types of vocalization elicited from anesthetized dogs. J Voice 1995;9:403-12.
18. Sato F, Hisa Y. Mechanical properties of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles and biomechanics of the glottis in dogs. In: Hirano M, Kirchner JA, Bless DM, eds. Neurolaryngology: Recent Advances. San Diego: College Hill Press, 1987;97.