Improving substance abuse treatment access and retention using a case management approach

Journal of Drug Issues

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 329-340

  Mejta, Cheryl L ^c   Bokos, Peter J ^b   Mickenberg, Judith ^a   Maslar, Michael E ^c   Senay, Edward ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b Interventions   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ABUSE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPIATE ADDICTION; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

EID: 0030878909     PISSN: 00220426     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002204269702700209     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anglin, M.D., and Y. Hser 1990 The treatment of drug abuse. In Drugs and Crime, eds. M. Terry and J.Q. Wilson, 393-460. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
2. Bale, R., W. Stone, J. Kuldan, T. Englesing, R. Elashoff, and V. Zarsove 1980 Therapeutic communities versus methadone maintenance. Archives of General Psychiatry 37: 170-193.
3. Bokos, P., C. Mejta, J. Mickenberg, R. and Monks 1992 Case management: An alternative approach to working with intravenous drug users. In Progress and issues in case management., eds. R. Sager Ashery, 92-111. Rockville, MD:National Institute on Drug Abuse (ADM) 92-1946.
4. Brower., K., F. Blow, and T. Beresford 1989 Treatment implications of chemical dependency models: An integrative approach. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 6:147-157.
5. Hester, R., and W. Miller 1988 Empirical guidelines for optimal client-treatment matching. In Adolescent substance abuse: Analyses of treatment research, eds. E.R. Rahdert and J. Grabowski, 27-38. Rockville, MD:National Institute on Drug Abuse (ADM) 88-1523.
6. Hubbard, R.L., M.E. Marsden, J.V. Rachal, H.J. Harwood, E.R. Cavanaugh, and H.M. Ginzburg 1989 Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
7. Lewis, D.C., and E.M. Klinenberg 1994 Substance abuse treatment is cost effective. Providence, Rhode Island:The Brown University News Bureau.
8. Maddux, J.F. 1993 Improving retention on methadone maintenance. In Innovative approaches in the treatment of XQ abuse: Program models and strategies, eds. J. Inciardi, F. Tims, and B. Fletcher, 21-33. Westport, CT:Greenwood Press,
9. McLellan, A., L. Luborsky, C. O'Brien, and G. Woody, G. 1980 An improved evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 168:26-33.
10. McLellan, A., C. O'Brien, R. Kron, A. Alterman, and K. Druley 1980 Matching substance abuse patients to appropriate treatment: A conceptual and methodological approach. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 5:189-195.
11. McLellan, A., L. Luborsky, G. Woody, C. O'Brien, and K. DruJey 1983 Increased effectiveness of substance abuse treatment: A prospective study of patient treatment "matching. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 171: 597-605.
12. Mundell, C. 1994 Drug abuse in Washington, D.C.: Insights from Quantitative and Qualitative research. College Park, MD:University of Maryland.
13. Mejta, C., P. Bokos, J. Mickenberg, E. Maslar, A. Hasson, V. Gil, Z. O'Keefe, S. Martin, H. Isenberg, J. Inciardi, D. Lockwood, R. Rapt, H. Siegal, J. Fisher, and J. Wagner 1994 Approaches to case management with substance abusing populations. In Addictions: Concepts and strategies for treatment, ed. J. Lewis, 301-320. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
14. National Opinion Research Center 1994 Evaluating recovery services: The California drug and alcohol treatment assessment. Sacramento, CA: State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
15. Prochaska, J.O., and C.C. DiClemente 1985 Toward a comprehensive model of change. In Treating addictive behaviors: Processes of change, eds. W. Miller and N. Heather, 3-27. New York: Plenum Press,
16. Sager Ashery, R., ed. 1992 Progress and Issues in Case Management. Rockville, MD:National Institute on Drug Abuse (ADM)92-1946.
17. Schlesinger, M., R. Dorwart, and R. Clark 1991 Public policy in a fragmented service system. In Drug abuse services research series. 16-57 Rockville, Maryland:National Institute on Drug Abuse (ADM) 91-1777.
18. Simpson, D. 1988 National Treatment System Evaluation based upon the Drug Abuse Reporting Program (DARP) followup research. In Drug Abuse Treatment Evaluation: Strategies, Progress, and Prospects,eds. F.M. Tims and J.L. Ludford, 29-41. Rockville, MD:National Institute on Drug Abuse (ADM) 88-1329.
19. Tims, F.M., B.W. Fletcher, and R.L. Hubbard 1991 Treatment outcomes for drug abuse clients. In Improving Drug Abuse Treatment, eds. R. Pickens, C. Leukefield, and C. Schuster, 93-113. Rockville, MD:National Institute on Drug Abuse (ADM)91-1754.
20. Watkins, W. 1994 Interventions' Central Intake Facility. Chicago Illinois. Personal Communication.
21. White House 1989 National Drug Control Strategy Washington, D.C.:U.S. Government Printing Office.
22. Willenbring, M.L., M.S. Ridgely, R. Stinchfield, and R. Rose 1991 Application of Case Management in Alcohol and Drug Dependence: Matching Techniques and Populations. Rockville, MD:National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (ADM)911766.