Cumulative pregnancy analysis of one-tube versus two-tube tubal anastomosis

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 217-219

  Isaacs Jr , John D ^a   Young, Ronald A ^a   Cowan, Bryan D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Prognostic variables; Sterilization reversal; Tubal anastomosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROSURGERY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SALPINGECTOMY; SURVIVAL; UTERINE TUBE;

EID: 0030878312     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81504-X     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Siegler AM, Hulka J, Peretz A. Reversibility of female sterilization. Fertil Steril 1985;43:499-510.
2. Spivak MM, Librach CL, Rosenthal DM. Microsurgical reversal of sterilization: a six-year study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;154:355-61.
3. Rouzi AA, Mackinnon M, McComb PF. Predictors of success of reversal of sterilization. Fertil Steril 1995;64:29-36.
4. Rock JA, Guzick D, Katz E, Zacur HA, King TM. Tubal anastomosis: pregnancy success following reversal of Falope ring or monopolar cautery sterilization. Fertil Steril 1987;48:13-7.
5. Silber SH, Cohen R. Microsurgical reversal of female sterilization: the role of tubal length. Fertil Steril 1980;33:598-603.
6. te Velde ER, Boer ME, Looman CWN, Habbema JDF. Factors influencing success or failure after reversal of sterilization: a multivariate approach. Fertil Steril 1990;54:270-7.
7. Xue P, Yuen-Yu F. Microsurgical reversal of female sterilization: long-term follow-up of 117 cases. J Reprod Med 1989;34:451-5.
8. Hulka JF, Halme J. Sterilization reversal: results of 101 attempts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:767-74.
9. DeCherney A, Mezer H. Current approach to tubal anastomosis. Obstet Gynecol Annu 1985;14:277-87.