A clinical and pathologic study on para-aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 82-87

  Hirahatake, Kohji ^a   Hareyama, Hitoshi ^a   Sakuragi, Noriaki ^a   Nishiya, Masashi ^a   Makinoda, Satoru ^a   Fujimoto, Seiichiro ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Endometrial carcinoma; Lymph node metastasis; Para aortic lymph node; pelvic lymph node

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; ENDOMETRIUM CARCINOMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYOMETRIUM; PARAAORTIC LYMPH NODE; PELVIS LYMPH NODE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; SALPINGOOOPHORECTOMY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AORTA; CARCINOMA, ADENOSQUAMOUS; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; METAPLASIA; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PELVIS; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 0030874297     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199706)65:2<82::AID-JSO3>3.0.CO;2-J     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Kurman RJ, et al.: Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 1991;40:55-65.
2. Piver MS, Lele SB, Barlow JJ, Blumenson L.: Paraaortic lymph node evaluation in stage I endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1982;59:97-100.
3. Chen SS, Lee L: Retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in stage I carcinoma of the endometrium: Correlation with risk factors. Gynecol Oncol 1983;16:319-325.
4. Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, et al.: Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer 1987;60:2035-2041.
5. Feuer GA, Calanog A: Endometrial carcinoma: Treatment of positive paraaortic nodes. Gynecol Oncol 1987;27:104-109.
6. Beck RP, Latour JPA: Necropsy reports on 36 cases of endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963;85:307-311.
7. Henriksen E: The lymphatic dissemination in endometrial carcinoma. A study of 188 necropsies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975;123: 570-576.
8. Chuang L, Burke TW, Tornos C, et al.: Staging laparotomy for endometrial carcinoma: Assessment of retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Gynecol Oncol 1995;58:189-193.
9. Satoh C: A clinical and pathological study on paraaortic lymph node metastasis in uterine cervical carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn 1994;46:1343-1350.
10. Girardi F, Petru E, Heydarfadai M, Winter R: Pelvic lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1993;49:177-180.
11. Belinson JL, Lee KR, Badger GJ, et al.: Clinical stage 1 adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: Analysis of recurrences and the potential benefit of staging lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1992;44:17-23.
12. Faught W, Krepart GV, Lotocki R, Heywood M: Should selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy be part of surgical staging for endometrial cancer? Gynecol Oncol 1994;55:51-55.
13. Kilgore LC, Partridge EE, Alvarez RD, et al.: Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: Survival comparisons of patients with and without pelvic node sampling. Gynecol Oncol 1995;56:29-33.
14. Corn BW, Lanciano RM, Greven KM, et al.: Endometrial cancer with para-aortic adenopathy: Patterns of failure and opportunities for cure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992;24:223-227.
15. Rose PG, Cha SD, Tak WK, et al.: Radiation therapy for surgically proven para-aortic node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992;24:229-233.
16. Potish RA, Twiggs LB, Adcock LL, et al.: Paraaortic lymph node radiotherapy in cancer of the uterine corpus. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65:251-256.
17. Blythe JG, Hondel KA, Wahl TP, et al.: Para-aortic node biopsy in cervical and endometrial cancers: Does it affect survival? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:306-314.
18. Larson DM, Johnson K, Olson KA: Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: Morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:998-1001.