Dosage choices of rats for morphine, for heroin, and between morphine and heroin

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 133-140

  Hutto Jr , Cecil W ^a   Crowder, William F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT MONROE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dose choice; Drug choice; Heroin; Morphine; Opioid reinforcement; Rats; Reinforcement efficacy

Indexed keywords

DIAMORPHINE; MORPHINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG CHOICE; DRUG COMPARISON; DRUG EFFECT; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; TRAINING;

ANALGESICS, OPIOID; ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HEROIN; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MALE; MORPHINE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY);

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0030860213     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(97)00010-5     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bailey W. N. Morphine self-administration in rats. Reinforcement or activity effects? 1983;University of Mississippi, [Dissertation]. University, MS. Dissert. Abstr. Int. No. DA8316174.
2. Balster R. L., Lucas S. E. Review of self-administration. Drug Alcohol Depend. 14:1985;249-261.
3. Balster R. L., Schuster C. R. A preference procedure that compares efficacy of different venous drug reinforcers in the rhesus monkey. Ellinwood E. H., Kilbey M. M. Cocaine and other stimulants. 1976;571-584 Plenum Publishing Co, New York.
4. Bardo M. T., Neisewander J. L. Single-trial conditioned place preference using intravenous morphine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Be-hav. 25:1986;1101-1105.
5. Barr G. A., Paredes W., Bridger W. H. Place conditioning with morphine and phencyclidine. Dose dependent effects Life Sci. 36:1985;363-368.
6. Bechara A., van der Kooy D. Opposite motivational effects of endogenous opioids in brain and periphery. Nature. 314:1985;533-534.
7. Bozarth M. A. Conditioned place preference. A parametric analysis using systemic heroin injections Bozarth M. A. Methods for assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. 1987;241-273 Springer-Verlag, New York.
8. Carr G. D., Fibiger H. C., Phillips A. G. Conditioned place preference as a measure of drug reward. Liebman J. M., Cooper S. J. The neuropharmacological basis of reward. 1989;264-319 Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
9. Crowder W. F., Hutto C. W. Operant place conditioning measures examined using morphine reinforcement. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 41:1992;825-835.
10. Ettenberg A., Geist T. G. Qualitative and quantitative differences in the operant runway behavior of rats working for cocaine and heroin reinforcement. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 44:1993;191-198.
11. Gilbert D., Cooper S. J. β-Phenylethylamine-, d-amphetamine- and l-amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 95:1983;311-314.
12. Graham C. H., Gagné R. M. The acquisition, extinction, and spontaneous recovery of a conditioned operant response. J. Exp. Psychol. 26:1940;251-280.
13. Katz J. L. Drugs as reinforcers. Pharmacological and behavioral factors Liebman J. M., Cooper S. J. The neuropharmacological basis of reward. 1989;164-213 Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
14. Katz J. L., Goldberg S. R. Preclinical assessment of abuse liability of drugs. Agents Actions. 23:1988;18-25.
15. Kumar R. Morphine dependence in rats. Secondary reinforcement from environmental stimuli Psychopharmacology (Berl.). 25:1972;332-338.
16. Mackintosh N. J. The psychology of animal learning. 1974;Academic Press, London. 184-186.
17. Miller N. E., DiCara L. V., Wolf G. Homeostasis and reward. T-maze learning induced by manipulating antidiuretic hormone Am. J. Psychol. 215:1996;684-686.
18. Mucha R. F., van der Kooy D., O'Shaughnessy M., Bucenieks P. Drug reinforcement studied by the use of place conditioning in rat. Brain Res. 243:1982;91-105.
19. Oldendorf W. H. Factors affecting passage of opiates through the blood-brain barrier. Adler M. L., Manara L., Samanin R. Factors affecting the actions of narcotics. 1978;221-231 Raven Press, New York.
20. Roberts D. C. S., Bennett S. A. L. Heroin self-administration in rats under a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berl.). 111:1993;215-218.
21. Rossi N. A., Reid, L. D Affective states associated with morphine injections. Physiol. Psychol. 4:1976;269-274.
22. Schenk S., Hunt T., Colle L., Amit Z. Isolation versus grouped housing in rats. Differential effects of low doses of heroin in the place preference paradigm Life Sci. 32:1983;1129-1134.
23. Schwartz A. S., Marchok P. L. Depression of morphine-seeking behavior by dopamine inhibition. Nature. 248:1974;257-258.
24. Spyraki C. Drug reward studied by the use of place conditioning in rats. Ladner M. H. Psychopharmacology of addiction. 1988;97-114 Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
25. Sufka K. J. Conditioned place preference paradigm. A novel approach for analgesic drug assessment under chronic pain Pain. 58:1994;355-366.
26. Sufka K. J. Novel approaches for analgesic drug assessment. New animal paradigms Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs. 5:1996;421-428.
27. Sufka K. J., Roach J. T. Stimulus properties and antinociceptive effects of selective bradykinin B1 and B2 receptor antagonists in rats. Pain. 66:1996;99-103.
28. Swerdlow N. R., Gilbert D., Koob G. F. Conditioned drug effects on spatial preference. Critical evaluation Boulton A. A. Neuromethods, vol. 13: 1989;399-446 Humana Press, Psychopharmacology. Totowa, NJ.
29. Weeks J. R. Long-term intravenous infusion. Myers R. D. Methods in psychobiology, vol 2. 1972;155-168 Academic Press, London.
30. Weeks J. R., Collins R. J. Screening for drug reinforcement using intravenous self-administration in the rat. Bozarth M. A. Methods for assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. 1987;35-44 Springer-Verlag, New York.
31. White N. M., Sklar L., Amit Z. The reinforcing action of morphine and its paradoxical side effects. Psychopharmacology. 52:1977;63-66.
32. Wise R. A. Intravenous drug self-administration. A special case of positive reinforcement Bozarth M. A. Methods for assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. 1987;117-142 Springer-Verlag, New York.
33. Wise R. A. The brain and reward. Liebman J. M., Cooper S. J. The neuropharmacological basis of reward. 1989;377-424 Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
34. Woolverton W. L., Balster R. L. Effects of antipsychotic compounds in rhesus monkeys given a choice between cocaine and food. Drug Alcohol Depend. 8:1981;69-78.