Comparison of modified technetium-99m albumin and technetium-99m red blood cells for equilibrium ventriculography

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 1521-1528

  Hambÿe, Anne Sophie E ^a   Verbeke, Kristin A ^b   Vandermeiren, Rudi P ^b   Joosens, Eric J ^b   Verbruggen, Alfons M ^b   De Roo, Michel J ^b  

^a MIDDELHEIM HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Gated blood pool imaging; Technetium 99m DMP HSA; Technetium 99m labeled red blood cells

Indexed keywords

DIMERCAPTOPROPIONYL HUMAN SERUM ALBUMIN TC 99M; ERYTHROCYTE TC 99M; HUMAN SERUM ALBUMIN TC 99M; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD POOL SCINTISCANNING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DRUG DISTRIBUTION; DRUG SYNTHESIS; FEMALE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART VENTRICLE WALL MOTION; HEART VENTRICULOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

ERYTHROCYTES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GATED BLOOD-POOL IMAGING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REAGENT KITS, DIAGNOSTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE VOLUME; SULFHYDRYL COMPOUNDS; TECHNETIUM; TECHNETIUM TC 99M AGGREGATED ALBUMIN; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 0030858717     PISSN: 01615505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bonow RO. Prognostic assessment in coronary artery disease: role of radionuclide angiography. J Nucl Cordiol 1994;1:280-291.
2. Mazzotta G, Pace L, Bonow RO. Risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction by exercise radionuclide angiography and exercise electrocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol 1994;1:529-536.
3. Gibbons RJ. Rest and exercise radionuclide angiography for diagnosis in chronic ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1991;84:93-99.
4. Borer SL, Bacharach SL, Green MV, Kent KM, Epstein SE, Johnston GS. Real-time radionuclide cineangiography in the noninvasive evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function at rest and during exercise in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1977;296:839-844.
5. Iskandrian AS, Hakki AH, DePace NL, Manno B, Segal BL. Evaluation of left ventricular function by radionuclide angiography during exercise in normal subjects and in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;1:1518-1529.
6. Gibbons RJ, Fyke E III, Clements IP, La Peyre AC III, Zinsmeister AR, Brown ML. Noninvasive identification of severe coronary artery disease using exercise radionuclide angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:28-34.
7. Lee KL, Pryor DB, Pieper KS, et al. Prognostic value of radionuclide angiography in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease: a comparison with clinical and catheterization variables. Circulation 1990;82:1705-1717.
8. Rerych SK, Scholz PM, Newman GE, Sabiston DC, Jones RH. Cardiac function at rest and during exercise in patients with coronary heart disease: evaluation by radionuclide angiography. Ann Surg 1978;187:449-463.
9. Pryor DB, Harrell FE, Lee KL, et al. Prognostic indicators from radionuclide angiography in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:18-22.
10. Miller TD, Christian TF, Taliercio CP, Zinsmeister AR, Gibbons RJ. Severe exercise-induced ischemia does not identify high risk patients with normal left ventricular function and one- or two-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23: 219-224.
11. Hartnell GG. Developments in echocardiography. Rodiol Clin North Am 1994;32:461-475.
12. Thompson BH, Stanford W. Evaluation of cardiac function with ultrafast computed tomography. Radiol Clin North Am 1994;32:537-551.
13. Deutsch HJ, Smolorz J, Sechtem V, Hombach V, Schicha H, Hilger HH. Cardiac function by magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Card Imag 1988;3:3-11.
14. Schnittger I, Fitzgerald PJ, Daughters GT, et al. Limitations of comparing left ventricular volumes by two dimensional echocardiography, myocardial markers and cineangiography. Am J Cardiol 1982;50:512-519.
15. Starling MR, Crawford MH, Sorenson SG, Levi B, Richards KL, O'Rourke RA. Comparative accuracy of apical bi-plane cross-sectional echocardiography and gated equilibrium radionuclide angiography for estimating left ventricular size and performance. Circulation 1981;63:1075-1084.
16. Thrall JH, Freitas JE, Swanson D, et al. Clinical comparison of cardiac blood pool visualization with technetium-99m red blood cells labeled in vivo and with technetium-99m human serum albumin. J Nucl Med 1978;19:796-803.
17. 99mTc-labeled human serum albumin and in vitro labeled red blood cells for blood pool studies. Clin Nucl Med 1980;5:166-169.
18. 99mTc: progress and perspectives. Semin Nucl Med 1990;20:41-51.
19. Rojas-Burke J. Health officials reacting to infection mishaps. J Nucl Med 1992;33: 13N-14N.
20. Silverman L. Misadministration spurs statewide inspection of California nuclear medicine departments. J Nucl Med 1992;33:32N-33N.
21. Lange JMA, Boucher CAB, Hollak CEM, et al. Failure of zidovudine prophylaxis in accidental exposure to HIV-1. N Engl J Med 1990;19:1375-1377.
22. Verbeke K, Vanbilloen HP, De Roo MJ, Verbruggen AM. Technetium-99m mercaptoalbumin as a potential substitute for technetium-99m-labeled red blood cells. Eur J Nucl Med 1993;20:473-482.
23. Verbeke KA, Vanhecke WB, Mortelmans LA, Verbruggen AM. First evaluation of technetium-99m dimercaptopropionyl albumin as a possible agent for ventriculography in a volunteer. Eur J Nucl Med 1994;21:906-912.
24. Hambÿe AS, Vandermeiren R, Vervaet A, Vandevivere J. Failure to label red blood cells adequately in daily practice using an in vivo method: methodological and clinical considerations. Eur J Nucl Med 1995;22:61-67.
25. Altman DG. Some common problems in medical research, method comparison studies. In: Altman DG, ed. Practical statistics for medical research, 1st ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991:396-403.
26. Strauss HW, Griffeth LK, Shahrokh FD, et al. Cardiovascular system. In; Bernier DR, Christian PE, Laugan JK, eds. Nuclear medicine technology and technics, 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1994:241-245.
27. Seawright SJ, Maton PJ, Greenall J. Factors affecting in vivo labeling of red blood cells. J Nucl Med Technol 1983;11:95.
28. Adalet I, Gantez S. Poor quality red blood cell labeling with technetium-99m: case report and review of the literature. Eur J Nucl Med 1994;21:173-175.
29. Rao SA, Knobel J, Collier BD, et al. Effect of Sn(II) ion concentration and heparin on technetium-99m red blood cell labeling. J Nucl Med 1986;27:1202-1206.
30. Sampson CB. Interference of patient medications in the radiolabelling of blood cells: in vivo and in vitro effects [Abstract]. Eur J Nucl Med 1994;21:S17.
31. Tatum JL, Burke TS, Hirsch JL, et al. Pitfall to modified in vivo method of technetium-99m red blood cell labeling: iodinated contrast media. Clin Nucl Med 1983;8:585-587.