Speechreading in the akinetopsic patient, L.M.

Brain

Volumn 120, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 1793-1803

  Campbell, R ^a   Zihl, J ^b   Massaro, D ^c   Munhall, K ^d   Cohen, M M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF PSYCHIATRY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Audiovisual fusion; Biological motion; Speechreading (lipreading); V5 lesions

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIP READING; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

AGED; BRAIN; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIPREADING; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PHOTOGRAPHY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030858595     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/120.10.1793     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Baker CL Jr, Hess RF, Zihl J. Residual motion perception in a 'motion-blind' patient assessed with limited-lifetime random dot stimuli. J. Neurosci 1991; 11: 454-61.
2. Bassili J. Facial motion in the perception of facesand of emotional expression. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1978; 4: 373-9.
3. Beckers G, Zeki S. The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception. Brain 1995; 118: 49-60.
4. Bernstein,LE, Eberhardt,SP. Johns Hopkins lipreading corpus [videodisk]. 1986.
5. Black MJ, Yacoob Y. Recognising facial expressions under rigid and nonrigid facial motions. In Proc Int Workshop Automat Face Gest Recn; 1995: 12-22.
6. Calvert GA, Bullmore ET, Brammer MJ, Campbell R, Williams SCR, McGuire PK. et al. Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science 1997; 276: 593-6.
7. Campbell R. The neuropsychology of lipreading. [Review]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1992; 335: 39-45.
8. Campbell R. Seeing speech in space and time: neurological and psychological findings. In: Proc 4th Int Congress Speech Lang Process 1996: 1493-7.
9. Campbell R, Dodd B. Hearing by eye. Q J Exp Psychol 1980; 32: 85-99.
10. Campbell R, Landis T, Regard M. Face recognition and lipreading: a neurological dissociation. Brain 1986; 109: 509-21.
11. Campbell R, Garwood J, Franklin S, Howard D, Landis T, Regard M. Neuropsychological studies of auditory-visual fusion illusions. Neuropsychologia 1990; 28: 787-802.
12. Cohen MM, Massaro DW. Synthesis of visible speech. Behav Res Meth Instrum 1990; 22: 260-3.
13. Cohen MM, Massaro DW. Modelling coarticulation in synthetic visual speech. In: Thalmann NM, Thalmann D, editors. Models and techniques in computer animation. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, 1993: 139-56.
14. Cohen MM, Massaro DW. Development and experimentation with synthetic visible speech. Behav Res Meth Instrum 1994; 26: 260-5.
15. Cutting JE.Generation of synthetic male and female walkers through manipulation of a biomechanical invariant. Perception 1978; 7: 393-405.
16. Cutting JE, Kozlowski LT. Recognizing friends by their walk: gait perception without familiarity cues. Bull Psychon Soc 1977; 9: 353-6.
17. Davis H, Silverman SR. Hearing and deafness. 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.
18. ffytche DH, Guy CN, Zeki S. The parallel visual motion inputs into areas V1 and V5 of human cerebral cortex. Brain 1995; 118: 1375-94.
19. Gouraud H. Continuous shading of curved surfaces. IEEE Trans Comput 1971; C-20: 623-8.
20. Green KP.The perception of speaking rate using visual information from a talker's face. Percept Psychophys 1987 587-93.
21. Green KP, Miller JL. On the role of visual rate information in phonetic perception. Percept Psychophys 1985; 38: 269-76.
22. Grüsser O-J, LandisT. Visual Agnosias and other disturbances of visual perception and cognition. In: Cronly-Dillon J, editor. Vision and visual dysfunction, Vol. 12. Basingstoke (UK): Macmillan, 1991: 394-5.
23. Hess RF, Baker CL Jr, Zihl J. The 'motion-blind' patient: low-level spatial and temporal filters. J Neurosci 1989; 9: 1628-40.
24. Howard RJ, Brammer M, Wright I, Woodruff PW, Bullmore ET, Zeki S. A direct demonstration of functional specialization within motion-related visual and auditory cortex of the human brain. Curr Biol 1996; 6: 1015-9.
25. Humphrey GK, Goodale MA, Jakobson LS, Servos P. The role of surface information in object recognition: studies of a visual form agnosic and normal subjects. Perception 1994; 23: 1457-81.
26. Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ. To see but not to see: a case study of visual agnosia. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987.
27. Humphreys GW, Donnelly N, Riddoch J. Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces. Neuropsychologia 1993; 31: 173-81.
28. Jansson G, Johansson G. Visual perception of bending motion. Perception 1973; 2: 321-6.
29. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys 1973; 14: 201-11.
30. Kozlowski LT, Cutting JE. Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Percept Pychophys 1977; 21: 575-80.
31. McGurk H, MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976; 264: 746-8.
32. McLeod P, Heywood C, Driver J, Zihl J. Selective deficit of visual search in moving displays after extrastriate damage. Nature 1989; 339: 466-7.
33. McLeod P, Dittrich W, Driver J, Perrett D, Zihl J. Preserved and impaired detection of structure from motion by a 'motion-blind' patient. Visual Cognit 1996; 3: 363-91.
34. Mase K, Pentland A. Lipreading by optical flow. IEICE Transactions J73-D-II 1990; 6: 796-803.
35. Massaro DW. Speech perception by ear and eye: a paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987.
36. Massaro DW, Cohen MM. Evaluation and integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1983; 9: 753-71.
37. Milner AD, Perrett DI, Johnston RS, Benson PJ, Jordan TR, Heeley DW, et al. Perception and action in 'visual form agnosia'. Brain 1991; 114: 405-28.
38. Munhall K, Vatikiotis-Bateson E. The moving face in speech communication. In: Campbell R, Dodd B, Burnham D, editors. Hearing by eye II: the psychology of speechreading and audiovisual speech. Hove (UK): Psychology Press, 1997. In press.
39. Newsome WT, Paré EB. A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). J Neurosci 1988; 8: 2201-11.
40. Ohala JJ. The temporal regulation of speech. In: Fant G, Tatham MA, editors. Auditory analysis and perception of speech. London: Academic Press, 1975: 431-53.
41. Oram MW, Perrett DI. Responses of anterior superior temporal polysensory (STPa) neurons to 'biological motion' stimuli. J Cog Neurosci 1994; 6: 99-116.
42. Parke FI. A model for human faces that allows speech synchronized animation. Comput Graphics J 1975; 1: 1-14.
43. Parke FI. Parameterized models for facial animation. IEEE Comput Graphics 1982; 2: 61-8.
44. Paulus W, Zihl J.Visual stabilization of posture in a case with selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage: real and apparent motion cues. Clin Vision Sci 1989; 4: 367-71.
45. Perrett DI, Harries MH, Benson PJ, Chitty AJ, Mistlin AJ. Retrieval of structure from rigid and biological motion: an analysis of the visual responses of neurones in the macaque temporal cortex. In: Blake A, Troscianko T, editors. AI and the eye. Chichester: John Wiley, 1990: 181-99.
46. Poizner H, Bellugi U, Lutes-Driscoll V. Perception of American Sign language in dynamic point-light displays. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1981; 7: 430-40.
47. Reisberg D, McLean J, Goldfield A. Easy to hear but hard to understand: a lip-reading advantage with intact auditory stimuli. In Dodd B, Campbell R, editors. Hearing by eye: the psychology of lip-reading. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987: 97-113.
48. Rizzo M, Nawrot M, Zihl J. Motion and shape perception in cerebral akinetopsia. Brain 1995; 118: 1105-27.
49. Rosenblum LD, Saldaña HM. An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1996; 22: 318-31.
50. Rosenblum LD, Johnson JA, Saldaña HM. Point-light facial displays enhance comprehension of speech in noise. J Speech Hear Res 1997. 1996; 39: 1159-70.
51. Sawatari A, Callaway EM. Convergence of magno-and parvocellular pathways in layer 4B of macaque primary visual cortex. Nature 1996; 380: 442-6.
52. Scheidler W, Landis T, Rentschler I, Regard M, Baumgartner G. A pattern recognition approach to visual agnosia. Clin Vision Sci 1992; 7: 175-93.
53. Shipp S, de Jong BM, Zihl J, Frackowiak RSJ, Zeki S. The brain activity related to residual motion vision in a patient with bilateral lesions of V5. Brain 1994; 117: 1023-38.
54. Sumby WH, Pollack I. Visual Contributions to speech intelligibility in noise. JASA 1954; 26: 212-5.
55. Tartter VC, Knowlton KC. Perception of sign language from an array of 27 moving spots. Nature 1981; 289: 676-8.
56. Troscianko T, Davidoff J, Humphreys G, Landis T, Fahle M, Greenlee M, et al. Human colour discrimination based on a non-parvocellular pathway. Curr Biol 1996; 6: 200-10.
57. Vaina L.M., LeMay M, Bienfang DC, Choi AY, Nakayama K. Intact 'biological motion' and 'structure from motion' perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: a case study. Vis Neurosci 1990; 5: 353-69.
58. Vatikiotis-Bateson E, Munhall KG, Hirayama M, Lee Y, Terzopoulos D. Dynamics of facial motion in speech: kinematic and electromyographic studies of orofacial structures. In: Stork DG, Hennecke ME, editors. Speechreading by humans and machines: models, systems, and applications. NATO-ASI Series F, Vol. 150. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1996: 221-32.
59. Vitkovitch M, Barber P. Visible speech as function of image quality. Appl Cogn Psychol 1996; 10: 121-40.
60. Zeki S. Cerebral Akinetopsia (visual motion blindness). A review. [Review]. Brain 1991; 114: 811-24.
61. Zeki S. A vision of the brain. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.
62. Zihl J, von Cramon D, Mai N. Selective disturbances of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. Brain 1983; 106: 313-40.
63. Zihl J, von Cramon D, Mai N, Schmid C. Disturbance of movement vision after bilateral posterior brain damage. Further evidence and follow up observations. Brain 1991; 114: 2235-52.