Prognostic value of objective semen parameters in an in vitro fertilization program

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 321-327

  Wittemer, Christiane ^a   Warter, Stéphanie ^b   Ohl, Jeanine ^a   Sudan, Bruno ^b   Mache, Abdel ^b   Dellenbach, Pierre ^a  

^a SIHCUS CMCO Centre Medico Chirurgical et Obstetrical   (France)

^b HÔPITAL CIVIL   (France)

Author keywords

Acrosome reaction; Hyperactivated motility; In vitro fertilization; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; Sperm kinetics

Indexed keywords

ACROSOME; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO SEGMENTATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY;

EID: 0030855165     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02765835     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Irvine DS, Mac Leod IC, Templeton AA, Masterton A, Taylor A: A prospective clinical study of the relationship between the computer assisted assessment of human semen quality and the achievement of pregnancy in vivo. Hum Reprod 1994;9:2324-2334
2. Mac Leod IC, Irvine DS, Masterton A, Taylor A, Templeton AA: Assessment of the conventional criteria of semen quality by computer-assisted image analysis: Evaluation of the Hamilton-Thorn motility analyser in the context of a service andrology laboratory. Hum Reprod 1994;9:310-319
3. Liu DY, Baker HWG: Tests of human sperm function and fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 1992;58:465-182
4. Aitken RJ: Assessment of sperm function for IVF. Hum Reprod 1988;3:89-95
5. Davis RO, Katz DF: Operational standards for CASA instruments. J Androl 1993;14:385-394
6. Calvo L, Dennison-Lagos L, Banks S, Dorfmann A, Thorsell L, Bustillo M, Schulmann J, Sherins RJ: Acrosome reaction inducibility predicts fertilization success at in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1880-1886
7. Calvo L, Dennison-Lagos L, Banks S, Sherins RJ: Characterization and frequency distribution of sperm acrosome reaction among normal and infertile men. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1875-1879
8. WHO (World Health Organisation): Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm Cervical Mucus Interaction, 3rd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992
9. Pilikian S, Czyba JC, Guerin JF, Pinatel MC, Adeleine P, Ecochard R: Analyse fonctionnelle des spermes inféconds présentant une 0sthénozoospermie isolée. 10th Congress of Société d'Andrologie de Langue Française, Oct. 29-31, 1992
10. Mendoza C, Carreras A, Moos J, Tesarik J: Distinction between true acrosome reaction and degenerative acrosome loss by a one step staining method using Pisum sativum agglutinin. J Reprod Fertil 1989;95:755-763
11. Veeck L: Typical morphology of the human oocyte and conceptus. In Atlas of the Human Oocyte and Early Conceptus, Vol 2. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1991, pp 1-99
12. Aitken RJ, Baker HWG, Irvine DS: On the nature of semen quality and infertility. Hum Reprod 1995;10:248-249
13. Krause W: Computer assisted semen analysis systems: Comparison with routine evaluation and prognostic value in male fertility and assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 1995;10(Suppl 1):60-66
14. Paston MJ, Sarkar S, Gates RP, Badawy SZA: Computer aided semen analysis variables as predictors of male fertility potential. Arch Androl 1994;33:93-99
15. Fillion C, Kraemer M, Martin-Pont B, Gonzales J: Analyse automatisée du mouvement des spermatozoïdes: Reproductibilité et intérêt pour le choix d'une technique d'AMP. 10th Congress of Société d'Andrologie de Langue Française, Oct. 29-31, 1992
16. Sukcharoen N, Keith J, Irvine S, Aitken RJ: Prediction of the in vitro fertilization potential of human spermatozoa using sperm function test: The effect of delay between testing and IVF. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1030-1034
17. Aitken RJ, Baker HWG: Seminal leucocytes: Passengers, terrorists or good Samaritans? Hum Reprod 1995;10:1736-1739
18. Aitken RJ, Buckingham D, Harkiss D: Analysis of the extent to which sperm movement can predict the results of ionophoreenhanced functional assays of the acrosome reaction and spermoocyte fusion. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1867-1874
19. Barratt CLR, Tomlinson MJ, Cooke ID: Prognostic significants of computerized motility analysis for in vivo fertility. Fertil Steril 1993;60:520-525
20. Montagut J, Regnier-Vigouroux G, Leprêtre S, Artigues MJ, Manzano M, Degoy J: Analyse cinétique des spermatozoïdes: Effets des conditions expérimentales sur la fonction flagellaire et détermination de seuils prédictifs de non-fécondation en fécondation in vitro. Réf Gyn Obs 1995;3:275-284
21. Mortimer D: The essential partnership between diagnostic andrology and modern assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1209-1213
22. Wang C, Leung A, Tsoi WL, Leung J, Ng V, Lee KF, Chang SYW: Evaluation of human sperm hyperactivated motility and its relationship with the zona-free hamster oocyte sperm penetration assay. J Androl 1991;12:253-257
23. Sukcharoen N, Keith J, Irvine DS. Aitken RJ: Definition of the optimal criteria for identifying hyperactivated human spermatozoa at 25Hz using in vitro fertilization as a functional end point. Hum Reprod 1995;10:2928-2937
24. Wang C, Lee GS, Leung A, Surrey ES, Chang SYW: Human sperm hyperactivation and acrosome reaction and their relationships to human in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1993;59:1221-1227
25. Ginburgh KA, Sacco AG, Ager JW, Moghissi KS: Variation of movement characteristics with washing and capacitation of spermatozoa. II. Multivariate statistical analysis and prediction of sperm penetration ability. Fertil Steril 1990;53:704-708
26. Hinney B, Wilke G, Michelmann HW: Prognostic value of an automated sperm analysis in IVF or insemination therapy. Andrology 1993;25:195-202
27. Mak C, Van Kooij RJ, Eimers JM, Te Velde ER: Human sperm movement assessed with the Hamilton-Thorn motility analyser and in vitro fertilization. Andrology 1994;26:323-329
28. Henkel ER, Müller C, Miska W, Gips H, Schill WB: Determination of the acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa is predictive of fertilization in vitro. Hum Reprod 1993;8:2128-2132
29. Bielsa MA, Andolz P, Gris JM, Martinez P, Egozcue J: Which semen parameters have a predictive value for pregnancy in infertile couples? Hum Reprod 1994;9:1887-1890
30. Parinaud J, Vieitez G, Moutaffian H, Richoilley G, Labal B: Variations in spontaneous and induced acrosome reaction: Correlations with semen parameters and in vitro fertilization results. Hum Reprod 1995;10:2085-2089
31. MacLeod IC, Irvine DS: The predictive value of computer assisted semen analysis in the context of a donor insemination program. Hum Reprod 1995;10:580-586
32. Parinaud J, Richoilley G, Milhet P, Moutaffian H, Vieitez G: Validation of a scoring method predicting the in-vitro fertilizing ability of human spermatozoa. Int J Androl 1996;19:18-22