Nicotine discrimination and self-administration in humans as a function of smoking status

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 131, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 361-370

  Perkins, Kenneth A ^a   Sanders, Mark ^a   D'Amico, Delia ^a   Wilson, Annette ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrilnination; Nicotine; Reinforcement; Self administration; Sex differences; Smoking status; Subjective effects; Tolerance

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE; PLACEBO;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG DISCRIMINATION; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; DRUG TOLERANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTRANASAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMOKING;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG TOLERANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NICOTINE; SELF ADMINISTRATION; SEX FACTORS; SMOKING;

EID: 0030852826     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002130050304     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barrett RJ, Caul WF, Huffman EM, Smith RL (1994) Drug discrimination is a continuous rather than a quantal process following training on a VI-TO schedule of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 113:289-296
2. Benowitz NL, Jacob P (1993) Nicotine and cotinine elimination kinetics in smokers and nonsmokers. Clin Pharmacol Ther 53:316-323
3. Bigelow GE, Preston KL (1989) Drug discrimination: methods for drug characterization and classification. In: Fischman MW, Mello NK (eds) Testing for abuse liability of drugs in humans. NIDA Research Monograph 92. US Govt Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pp 101-122
4. Chiamulera C, Borgo C, Falchetto S, Valerio E, Tessari M (1996) Nicotine reinstatement of nicotine self-administration after long-term extinction. Psychopharmacology 127:102-107
5. Collins AC, Burch JB, deFiebre CM, Marks MJ (1988) Tolerance to and cross-tolerance between ethanol and nicotine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 29:365 373
6. Corrigall WA, Coen KM (1994) Dopamine mechanisms play at best a small role in the nicotine discriminative stimulus. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48:817-820
7. Corrigall WA, Franklin KBJ, Coen KM, Clarke PBS (1992) The mesolimbic dopaminergic system is implicated in the reinforcing effects of nicotine. Psychopharmacology 107:285-289
8. deWit H, McCracken SG (1990) Ethanol self-administration in males with and without an alcoholic first-degree relative. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 14:63-70
9. deWit HJ, Pierri J, Johanson CE (1989) Reinforcing and subjective effects of diazepam in nondrug-abusing volunteers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 33:205 213
10. Epstein LH, Caggiula AR, Perkins KA, McKenzie SJ, Smith JA (1991) Conditioned tolerance to the heart rate effects of nicotine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 39:15-19
11. Fagerstrom K-O, Schneider NG (1989) Measuring nicotine dependence: a review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. J Behav Med 12:159-182
12. Fagerstrom K-O, Kunze M, Schoberberger R, Breslau N, Hughes JR, Hurt RD et al. (1996) Nicotine dependence versus smoking prevalence: comparisons among countries and categories of smokers. Tobacco Control 5:52-56
13. Henningfield JE, Goldberg SR (1983) Control of behavior by intravenous nicotine injections in human subjects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 19:1021-1026
14. Hughes JR, Strickler G, King D, Higgins ST, Fenwick JW, Gulliver SB, Mireault G (1989) Smoking history, instructions and the effects of nicotine: two pilot studies. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 34:149-155
15. Huitema BE (1980) Analysis of covariance and alternatives. Wiley, New York
16. Jacob P, Wilson M, Benowitz NL (1981) Improved gas chromatographic method for the determination of nicotine and cotinine in biologic fluids. J Chromatogr 222:61-70
17. Kalant H, Leblanc AE, Gibbins RJ (1971) Tolerance to, and dependence on, some non-opiate psychotropic drugs. Pharmacol Rev 23:135-191
18. Karim MR, Zeger SL (1988) GEE: a SAS Macro for longitudinal data analysis (version 1). Technical Report #674 from the Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University
19. Kenford SL, Fiore MC, Jorenby DE, Smith SS, Wetter D, Baker TB (1994) Predicting smoking cessation: who will quit with and without the nicotine patch. JAMA 271:589-594
20. Kim DJB, Brioni JD (1995) Modulation of the discriminative stimulus properties of (-)nicotine by diazepam and ethanol. Drug Dev Res 34:47-54
21. Lansky D, Nathan PE, Lawson DM (1978) Blood alcohol level discrimination by alcoholics: the role of internal and external cues. J Consult Clin Psychol 46:953 960
22. Lee BL, Benowitz NL, Jacob P (1987) Influence of tobacco abstinence on the disposition kinetics and effects of nicotine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 41:474-479
23. Lipscomb TR, Nathan PE (1980) Blood alcohol level discrimination: the effects of family history of alcoholism, drinking pattern, and tolerance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37:571-576
24. McNair DM, Loor M, Droppelman LF (1971) Profile of Mood States. Educational and Testing Service, San Diego, Calif.
25. McNeill AD (1991) The development of dependence on smoking in children. Br J Addict 86:589 592
26. Oliveto AH, Hughes JR, Higgins ST, Bickel WK, Pepper SL, Shea PJ, Fenwick JW (1992) Forced-choice versus free-choice procedures: caffeine self-administration in humans. Psychopharmacology 109:85-91
27. Perkins KA (1996) Sex differences in nicotine versus non-nicotine reinforcement of tobacco smoking. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 4:166-177
28. Perkins KA, Stitzer M (in press) Behavioral pharmacology of nicotine. In: Tarter RL, Ammerman RT, Ott P (eds) Sourcebook on substance abuse: etiology, methodology, and intervention. Ayllon & Bacon, New York
29. Perkins KA, Epstein LH, Stiller R, Jennings JR, Christiansen C, McCarthy T (1986) An aerosol spray alternative to cigarette smoking in the study of the behavioral and physiological effects of nicotine. Behav Res Meth Instr Comput 18:420 426
30. Perkins KA, DiMarco A, Grobe JE, Scierka A, Stiller RL (1994a) Nicotine discrimination in male and female smokers. Psychopharmacology 116:407 413
31. Perkins KA, Grobe JE, Fonte C, Goettler J, Caggiula AR, Reynolds WA, Stiller RL, Scierka A, Jacob R (1994b) Chronic and acute tolerance to subjective, behavioral, and cardiovascular effects of nicotine in humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 270: 628 638
32. Perkins KA, Sexton JE, Reynolds WA, Grobe JE, Fonte C, Stiller RL (1994c) Comparison of acute subjective and heart rate effects of nicotine intake via tobacco smoking vs. nasal spray. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 47:295-299
33. Perkins KA, D'Amico D, Sanders M, Grobe JE, Wilson A, Stiller RL (1996a) Influence of training dose on nicotine discrimination in humans. Psychopharmacology 126:132-139
34. Perkins KA, Grobe JE, Weiss D, Fonte C, Caggiula A (1996b) Nicotine preference in smokers as a function of smoking abstinence. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 55:257-263
35. Perkins KA, Grobe JE, D'Amico D, Fonte C, Wilson AS, Stiller RL (1996c) Low-dose nicotine nasal spray use and effects during initial smoking cessation. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 4:157 165
36. Perkins KA, Grobe JE, Caggiula A (1997) Acute reinforcing effects of low-dose nicotine nasal spray in humans. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 56:235-241
37. Pomerleau OF, Pomerleau CS, Rose JE (1989) Controlled dosing of nicotine: a review of problems and progress. Ann Behav Med 11:158-163
38. Preston KL (1991) Drug discrimination methods in human drug abuse liability evaluation. Br J Addict 86:1587 1594
39. Robinson SF, Marks MJ, Collins AC (1996) Inbred mouse strains vary in oral self-selection of nicotine. Psychopharmacology 124: 332-339
40. Schechter MD, Meehan SM, Schechter JB (1995) Genetic selection for nicotine activity in mice correlates with conditioned place preference. Eur J Pharmacol 279:59-64
41. Shiffman S (1989) Tobacco 'chippers' individual differences in tobacco dependence. Psychopharmacology 97:539-547
42. Stolerman IP, Jarvis MJ (1995) The scientific case that nicotine is addictive. Psychopharmacology 117:2 10
43. Young AM (1991) Tolerance to drugs acting as discriminative stimuli. In: Glennon RA, Jarbe TUC, Frankenheim J (eds) Drug discrimination: applications to drug abuse research. NIDA Research Monograph 116, US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., pp 197 212