Response of first generation tomato somaclone progeny to Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis

Plant Science

Volumn 126, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 69-77

  De Vries, Renee M ^a,b   Stephens, Christine T ^a,c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bacterial canker; Somaclonal variation; Tomato

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; INFECTION RESISTANCE; PLANT SEED; PROGENY; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; TOMATO;

CLAVIBACTER MICHIGANENSIS;

EID: 0030851560     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9452(97)00089-7     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. D.L. Strider, 1969. Bacterial canker of tomato caused by Corynebacterium michiganense: a literature review and bibliography. North Carolina Agricultural Experimental Statistical Technical Bulletin 3, North Carolina Agricultural Experimental Stn., Raleigh NC, pp. 1-110.
2. R.D. Gitaitis, R.W. Beaver, A.E. Voloudakis, Detection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis in symptomless tomato transplants, Plant Dis. 75 (1991) 834-838.
3. S.Z. Berry, G.G. Madumadu, M.R. Uddin, D.L. Coplin, Virulence studies and resistance to Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganen- sis in tomato germplasm, Hort. Science 24 (1989) 362-365.
4. V. Poysa, Evaluation of tomato breeding lines resistant to bacterial canker, Can. J. Plant Pathol. 15 (1993) 301-304.
5. J. de Jong, S. Honma, Evaluation of screening techniques and determination of criteria for assessing resistance to Corynebacterium michiganense in tomato, Euphytica 25 (1976) 405-414.
6. G.G. Madumadu, 1985. Inheritance of resistance to Corynebacterium michiganense (E. F. Sm.) H. L. Jens in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and effect of host nutrition (N and Ca) on resistance. PhD disseration, Ohio State University, Columbus, pp. 1-130.
7. B.D. Thyr, Inheritance of resistance to Corynebacterium michiganense in tomato, Phytopathology 66 (1976) 1116-1119.
8. P. Lindhout, C. Purimahau, A. Van der Giessen, New resistance to bacterial canker in the wild tomato species Lycopersicon peruvianum, Prophyta 41 (1987) 100-102.
9. B.D. Thyr, Resistance to Corynebacterium michiganense measured in six Lycopersicon accesions, Phytopathology 61 (1971) 972-974.
10. N.A.M. van Steekeleenburg, Resistance to Corynebacterium michiganense in tomato genotypes, Euphytica 34 (1985) 245-250.
11. S. Wakimoto, T. Uematsu, H. Mukoo, 1968. Bacterial canker disease of tomato in Japan. I. Isolation and identification of the causal organism bacterium and resistance of tomato varieties against the disease. Bulletin of the National Institute of Agricultural and Science Japan, Series C, No. 22, pp. 269-282.
12. B.R. Thomas, D. Prat, Isolation of paraquat tolerant mutants from tomato cell cultures, Theor. Appl. Genet. 63 (1982) 169-176.
13. C.Y. Yu, J.B. Masiunas, Somaclonal variation in Solanum and Lycopersicon genotypes, Hort. Science 25 (1990) 1082.
14. D.A. Evans, DNAP-9. Plant Variety Protection Certificate no. 8400146, 1987.
15. H. Toyoda, K. Shimizu, K. Chatani, N. Kita, Y. Matsuda, S. Ouchi, Selection of bacterial wilt-resistant tomato through tissue culture, Plant Cell Rep. 8 (1989) 317-320.
16. K.A. Barden, S.S. Smith, H.H. Murakishi, Regeneration and screening of tomato somaclones for resistance to tobacco mosaic virus, Plant Sci. 45 (1986) 209-213.
17. S.S. Smith, H.H. Murakishi, Restricted virus multiplication and movement of tomato mosaic virus in resistant tomato somaclones, Plant Sci. 89 (1993) 113-122.
18. D.A. Evans, Somaclonal variation- genetic basis and breeding applica- tions, Trends Genet. 5 (1989) 46-50.
19. S.A. Miller, G.R. Williams, H. Medina-Filho, D.A. Evans, A somaclonal variant of tomato resistant to race 2 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.lycopersici, Phytopathology 75 (1985) 1354.
20. E.A. Shahin, 1984. Isolation and culture of protoplasts: tomato. In: Vasil, I.K. (Ed.), Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, vol. 1, Academic Press, pp. 370-380.
21. R.M. De Vries-Paterson, C.T. Stephens. Evaluation of 'Bulgaria 12' tomato somaclone progeny for resistance to Clavibacter subsp. michiganensis, Phytopathology 79 (1989) 1167.
22. R.M. De Vries-Paterson, C.T. Stephens, Variation among first generation somaclones and irradiated tomato seedlings in response to Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Phytopathology 80 (1990) 999.
23. D.A. Evans, W.R. Sharp, Single gene mutants in tomato plants regenerated from tissue culture, Science 221 (1983) 949-951.
24. J. de Jong, S. Honma, Evaluation of screening techniques and determination of criteria for assessing resistance to Cornebacterium michiganense in tomato, Euphytica 25 (1976) 405-414.
25. M. Fatmi, N.W. Schaad, Semiselective agar medium for isolation of Clavibacter michiganense from tomato seed, Phytopathology 78 (1988) 121-126.
26. A.F. Olah, A.F. Schmitthenner, Phytophthora disease reactions in somatic embryo regenerant soybean lines, Phytopathology 78 (1988) 1543.
27. K.F. Toth, M.L. Lacy, Increasing resistance in celery to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii race 2 with somaclonal variation, Plant Dis. 75 (1991) 1034-1037.
28. K.A. Barden, 1985. Variation among tomato seedlings and somaclonal response to inoculation with tomato mosaic virus. MS thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, pp. 1-66
29. C. Brown, J.A. Lucas, I.R. Crute, D.G.A. Walkey, J.B. Power, An assessment of genetic variability in somacloned lettuce plants (Latuca sativa) and their offspring, Ann. Appl. Biol. 109 (1986) 391-407.
30. M. Buiatti, G. Marcheschi, F. Tognoni, M. Lippucci di Paola, F. Collina Grenci, G. Maritini, Genetic variation induced by tissue culture in the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), Z. Pflanzen zuchtg. 94 (1985) 162-165.
31. E.A. Shahin, R. Spivey, A single dominant gene for Fusarium wilt resistance in protoplast derived tomato plants, Theor. Appl. Genet. 73 (1986) 164-169.
32. M. Behnke, Genetic resistance to late blight of Solanum tuberosum plants regenerated from callus resistant to culture filtrates of Phytophthora infestans, Theor. Appl. Genet. 56 (1980) 151-152.
33. J.P. Helgeson, B.J. De Verall, 1983. Use of Tissue Culture and Protoplasts in Plant Pathology, Academic, New York, pp. 1-194.
34. N.P. Shoemaker, H.J. Swartz, G.J. Galletta, Cultivar-dependent variation in pathogen resistance due to tissue culture-propagation of strawberries, Hort. Science 20 (1985) 253-254.
35. A.O. Latunde-Dada, J.A. Lucas, Somaclonal variation and reaction to Verticillium wilt in Medicago sativa, Plant Sci. Lett. 32 (1983) 205-211.
36. R.W. van den Bulk, J. Jansen, W.H. Lindhout, H.J.M. Loffler, Screening of tomato somaclones for resistance to bacterial canker (Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis), Plant Breeding 107 (1991) 190-196.
37. H. Laterrot, F. Kaan, Resistance to Corynebacterium michiganense of lines bred for resistance to Pseudomonas solanacerarum., Tom. Genet. Coop. Rep. 28 (1978) 7-8.