Defining dysfunction: Group means versus incidence analysis - A statement of consensus

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 904-905

  Murkin, John M ^a,e   Stump, David A ^b   Blumenthal, James A ^c   McKhann, Guy ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN DYSFUNCTION; COGNITION; HEART SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT SURVEY; SURGICAL PATIENT;

EID: 0030848559     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00743-1     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Murkin JM, Newman SP, Stump DA, Blumenthal JA. Statement of consensus on assessment of neurobehavioral outcomes after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59: 1289-95.
2. Mahanna EP, Blumenthal JA, White WD, et al. Cognitive decline following cardiac surgery: a comparison of criteria for defining neuropsychological dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1342-7.
3. Stump DA. Selection and clinical significance of neuropsychological tests. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1340-4.
4. Newman SP. Analysis and interpretation of neuropsychologic tests in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1351-5.