Analysis of anomaly correlations

Geophysics

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 342-351

  Von Frese, Ralph R B ^a   Jones, Michael B ^a,b   Kim, Jeong Woo ^a   Kim, Jeong Hee ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EXXONMOBIL UPSTREAM RESEARCH COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DATA REDUCTION; GRAPHIC METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CORRELATION FILTERS; FEATURE CORRELATIONS; NORMALIZATION FACTORS; WAVENUMBERS;

GEOPHYSICS;

ANOMALY CORRECTION; DATA PROCESSING; GEOPHYSICAL INTERPRETATION; GRAVITY ANOMALY; MAGNETIC ANOMALY;

EID: 0030845506     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1444136     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alsdorf, D. E., 1991, Statistical processing of Magsat data for magnetic anomalies of the lithosphere: M.Sc. thesis, The Ohio State Univ.
2. Alsdorf, D. E., von Frese, R. R. B., Arkani-Hamed, J., and Noltimier, H. C., 1994, Separation of lithospheric, external, and core components of the south polar geomagnetic field at satellite altitudes: J. Geophys. Res., 99, 4655-4667.
3. Arkani-Hamed, J., Langel, R. A., and Purucker, M., 1994, Magnetic anomaly maps of Earth derived from POGO and Magsat data: J. Geophys. Res., 99, 24 075-24 090.
4. Arkani-Hamed, J., and Strangway, D. W., 1985, Intermediate-scale magnetic anomalies of the Earth: Geophysics, 50, 2817-2830.
5. _ 1986, Magnetic susceptibility anomalies of the lithosphere beneath Europe and the Middle East: Geophysics, 51, 1711-1724.
6. Bevington, P. R., 1969, Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
7. Chandler, V. W., Koski, J. S., Hinze, W. J., and Braile, L. W., 1981, Analysis of multisource gravity and magnetic anomaly data sets by moving-window application of Poisson's theorem: Geophysics, 46, 30-39.
8. Davis, J. C., 1986, Statistics and data analysis in geology: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
9. Dorman, L. M., and Lewis, B. T. R., 1970, Experimental isostacy 1. Theory of the determination of the earth's isostatic response to a concentrated load: J. Geophys. Res., 75, 3357-3365.
10. Forsyth, D. W., 1985, Subsurface loading and estimates of the flexural rigidity of the continental lithosphere: J. Geophys. Res., 90, 12 623-12 632.
11. Jones, M. B., 1988, Correlative analysis of the gravity and magnetic anomalies of Ohio and their geological significance: M.Sc. thesis, The Ohio State Univ.
12. Kaula, W. M., 1967, Geophysical implications of satellite determinations of the earth's gravitational field: Space Sci. Rev., 7, 769-794.
13. Kim, J. H., and von Frese, R. R. B., 1993, Enhanced recovery of gravity field from satellite altimetry using geological constraints: EOS, Am. Geophys. Union Trans., 74, 99.
14. Kovatch, G. T., 1990, Geological analysis of Magsat observations over Antarctica and surrounding marine areas: M.Sc. thesis (unpubl.), The Ohio State Univ.
15. Lucius, J. E., 1985, Crustal geology of Ohio inferred from aeromagnetic and gravity anomaly analysis: M.Sc. thesis (unpubl.), The Ohio State Univ.
16. Merriam, D. E. and Sneath, P. H. A., 1966, Quantitative comparison of contour maps: J. Geophys. Res., 7, 1105-1115.
17. Rapp, R. H., Wang, Y. M., and Pavlis, N. K., 1991, The Ohio State 1991 geopotential and sea surface topography harmonic coefficient models: Report 410, Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State Univ.
18. Ridgway, J. R., 1984, Preparation and interpretation of a revised Magsat satellite magnetic anomaly map over South America: M.Sc. thesis, Purdue Univ.
19. Ridgway, J. R., and Hinze, W. J., 1986, Magsat scalar anomaly map of South America: Geophysics, 51, 1472-1479.
20. Sailor, R. V., and Discoll, M. L., 1993, Noise models for satellite altimeter data: EOS, Am. Geophys. Union Trans., 74, 99.
21. Toksöz, M. R, Arkani-Hamed, J., and Knight, C. A., 1969, Geophysical data and long-wavelength heterogeneities of the earth's mantle: J. Geophys. Res., 74, 3751-3770.
22. von Frese, R. R. B., Hinze, W. J., and Braile, L. W., 1981, Spherical earth gravity and magnetic anomaly analysis by equivalent point source inversion: Earth Planet. Sci. Lett, 53, 69-83.
23. _ 1982, Regional North American gravity and magnetic anomaly correlations: Geophys. J. Roy., Astr. Soc., 69, 745-761.
24. von Frese, R. R. B., Jones, M. B., Kim, J. W., and Li, W. S., 1997, Spectral correlation of magnetic and gravity anomalies of Ohio: Geophysics, 62, 365-380.