Neighborhood graphs and image processing. Application to images of immunohistochemical staining;Graphes de voisinage et traitement d'images. Application a des images de marquage immunohistochimique

Bulletin du Cancer

Volumn 84, Issue 9, 1997, Pages 849-854

  Angot, François ^a   Herlin, Paulette ^b   Elmoataz, Abderrahim ^a   Revenu, Marinette ^a   Mandard, Anne Marie ^b   Bloyet, Daniel ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b CENTRE FRANÇOIS BACLESSE   (France)

Author keywords

image analysis; neighborhood graphs; quantitative immunohistochemistry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE HISTOCHEMISTRY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CELL NUCLEUS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; EPITHELIUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; STAINING AND LABELING; STROMAL CELLS;

EID: 0030841504     PISSN: 00074551     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Weinber DS. Quantitative immunocytochemistry in pathology. In : AM Marchevsky and PH Bartels, eds., Image analysis : a primer for pathologists, Raven Press, New York, 1994 : 57-77.
2. Belhomme P. Stratégie d'analyse automatisée d'images couleur adaptée à la quantification des immunomarquages : une approche par la morphologie mathématique. Thèse de doctorat de l'université de Caen, juin 1996.
3. Haroske G, Dimmer V, Steindorf D, Schilling U, Theissig F, Kunze KD. Cellular sociology of proliferating tumor cells in invasive ductal breast cancer. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology 1996 ; 18 :191-8.
4. Palmari J, Dussert C, Berthois Y, Penel C, Martin PM. Distribution of estrogen receptor heterogeneity in growing MCF-7 cells measured by quantitative microscopy. Cytometry 1997 ; 27 : 26-35.
5. Souchier C, Guigard MP, Fonlupt P, Trouillas J. Quantitative evaluation of the distribution of cell density ; application to human pituitary corticotroph cells. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology 1996 ; 18 : 251-60.
6. Darro F, Kruczynski A, Etievant C, Martinez J, Pasteels JL, Kiss R. Characterization of the differentiation of human colorectal cancer cell lines by means of Voronoï diagrams. Cytometry 1993 ; 14 : 783-92.
7. Beltrami CA, Della Mea V, Finato N. Structure analysis of breast cancer lesions using neighborhood graphs. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology 1995 ; 17 : 143-50.
8. Bibbo M, Kim DH, Di Loreto C, et al. Tissue architectural features for the grading of prostatic carcinoma. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology 1990 ; 12 : 229-36.
9. Rodenacker K, Aubele M, Jütting U, et al. Image cytometry in histological sections. Acta Stereol 1992 ; 11 (suppl. 1) : 249-54.
10. Kayser K, Berthold S, Eichhorn S, Kayser C, Ziehms S, Gabius HJ. Application of attributed graphs in diagnostic pathology. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology 1996 ; 18 : 286-92.
11. Kayser K, Sandau K, Böhm G, Kunze KD, Paul J. Analysis of soft tissue tumors by an attributed minimum spanning tree. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology 1991 ; 13 : 329-34.
12. Palmari J, Teysseire N, Dussert C, Raoult D. Image cytology and topographical analysis of proliferation of endothelial cells in vitro during Bartonella (Rochalimaea) infection. Analytical Cellular Pathology 1996 ; 11 :13-30.
13. Van Diest PJ, Fleege JC, Baak JPA. Syntactic structure analysis in invasive breast cancer. Human Pathology 1992 ; 23 : 876-83.
14. Smadja M, Philipp S. Segmentation of uterus sections using an extraction of the nuclei. Acta Stereol 1992 ; 11 (suppl. 1) : 625-30.
15. Mazille JE. Analyse de structures complexes par la théorie des graphes. La Revue de Métallurgie - CIT/Science et Génie des Matériaux 1994 ; 2 : 223-32.
16. Raymond E, Raphael M, Grimaud M, Vincent L, Binet JL, Meyer M. Germinal center analysis with the tools of mathematical morphology on graphs. Cytometry 1993 ; 14 : 848-61.
17. Vincent L. Graphes et morphologie mathématique. In: Algorithmes morphologiques à base de files d'attente et de lacets. Extension aux graphes. Thèse de l'École des mines de Paris, mai 1990.
18. Marcelpoil R. Normalization of the minimum spanning tree. Analytical Cellular Pathology 1993 ; 5 :177-86.
19. Meijer GA, Van Diest PJ, Baak JPA, Brinkhuis M, Beentjes M. Influence of boundary effect on minimum spanning tree features. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology 1996 ; 18 : 225-32.
20. Angot F, Clouard R, Elmoataz A, Revenu R. Neighborhood graphs and image processing. European Symposium on Lasers, Optics, and Vision for Productivity in Manufacturing. Besançon, France, June 1996; SPIE vol. 2785 : 12-23.
21. Chassery JM, Montanvert A. Géométrie discrète en analyse d'images. Traité des Nouvelles Technologies, Séries Images Hermes, 1991.
22. Bartels PH, Thompson D. Scene segmentation. In AM Marchevsky and PH Bartels, eds., Image analysis : a primer for pothologists. Raven Press, New York, 1994 : 57-77.
23. Serra J. Image analysis and mathematical morphology. Academic Press, London, 1982.
24. Elmoataz A, Belhomme P, Herlin P, Schupp S, Revenu M, Bloyet D. Automated segmentation of cytological and histological images for the nuclear quantification : an approach based on mathematical morphology. Microscopy, Microanalysis, Microstructure (in press).
25. Zahn CT. Graph-theoretical methods for detecting and describing gestalt clusters. IEEE Transactions on Computers. 1971 ; C-20 : 68-86.