Septic complications after biliary tract stone surgery: A review and report of the European prospective study

Hepato-Gastroenterology

Volumn 44, Issue 16, 1997, Pages 959-967

  Cainzos, M ^a   Sayek, I ^b   Wacha, H ^c   Pulay, I ^d   Dominion, L ^e   Aeberhard, P F ^f   Hau, T ^g   Aasen, A O ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c Hospital zum heiligen Geist   (Germany)

^d SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^f Kantonsspital Aarau ^*  (Switzerland)

^g Nordwest Krankenhaus Sanderbusch   (Germany)

^h OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Biliary gallstones; Biliary surgery; Postoperative infections; Septic complications

Indexed keywords

CEFAZOLIN;

ABDOMINAL INFECTION; ADULT; AGED; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; BILIARY TRACT SURGERY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; GALLSTONE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEPSIS; WOUND INFECTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; BACTERIA; BILIARY TRACT; BILIARY TRACT SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CHOLELITHIASIS; EUROPE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEPSIS;

EID: 0030834230     PISSN: 01726390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Cruse P. Infection surveillance: Identifying the problems and the high-risk patient. South. Med. J. 1977; 70: 4-8.
2. Stone HH, Tucci VJ, Isenberg HD, Wise L. Wound infection. Acute versus chronic cholecystitis. Am. J. Surg. 1977; 133:285-288.
3. Farber BF, Wenzel RP. Postoperative wound infection rates: Results of prospective stat wide surveillance. Am. J. Surg. 1980; 140:343-346.
4. Coles B, van Heerden JA, Keys TF, Haldorson A. Incidence of wound infection for common general surgical procedures. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1982; 154: 557-560.
5. Hollands MJ, May ARL, Edwards JM, Nash AG. Oral cholecystographic findings and the incidence of wound infection after cholecystectomy. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1983; 156: 161-162.
6. Sarr MG, Parikh KJ, Minken SL, Zuidema GD, Cameron JL. Closed-suction versus Penrose drainage after cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized evaluation. Am. J. Surg.1987; 153: 394-398.
7. Lewis RT, Goodall RG, Marien B, Park M, Lloyd-Smith W, Wiegand FM. Biliary bacteria antibiotic use and wound infection in surgery of the gallbladder and common bile duct. Arch. Surg. 1987;122: 44-47.
8. Olson MM, Lee JT. Continuous 10-year wound infection surveillance. Results advantages and unanswered questions. Arch. Surg. 1990; 125: 794-803.
9. Garibaldi RA, Skolnick D, Maglio S, Graham J, Lerer T, Lyons R, Becker D. Postcholecystectomy wound infection. The impact of prophylactic antibiotics on the epidemiology of infections. Ann. Surg. 1986; 204: 650-654.
10. Neoptolemos JP, Shaw DE, Carr-Locke DL. A multivariable analysis of preoperative risk factor in patients with common bile duct stones. Implications for treatment. Ann. Surg. 1089;209: 157-161.
11. Cainzos M, Potel J, Puente JL. Prospective randomized controlled study of prophylaxis with cefamandole in high-risk patients undergoing operations upon the biliary tract. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1985; 160: 27-32.
12. Lipsett PA, Pitt HA. Acute cholangitis. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 1990; 70: 1297-1312.
13. Cucchiaro G, Watters CR, Rossitch JC, Meyers WC. Deaths from gallstones. Incidence and associated clinical factors. Ann. Surg. 1989; 209: 149-151.
14. Csendes A, Díaz J.C, Burdiles P, Maluenda F, Morales E. Risk Factors and Classification of Acute Suppurative Cholangitis. Br. J. Surg. 1992 ; 79: 655-658.
15. Pitt HA, Postier RG, Cameron JL. Biliary bacteria. Significance and alterations after antibiotic therapy. Ach. Surg. 1982;117: 445-449.
16. Willis RG, Lawson WC, Hoare EM, Kinston RD, Sykes PA. Are bile bacteria relevant to septic complications following biliary surgery? Br. J. Surg. 1984; 71: 845-849.
17. Kasholm-Tengve B. Selective antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract operations. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1991; 173: 25-28.
18. Landau O, Kott I, Deutsch A.A, Stelman E, Reiss R. Multifactorial analysis of septic bile and septic complications in biliary surgery. World J. Surg. 1992; 16: 962-965.
19. Targarona EM, Garau J, Muñoz-Ramos C, Roset F, Lite J, Matas E, Marco C. Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in patients at high risk for infection in biliary surgery: A prospective and randomized study comparing cefonicid with mezlocillin. Surgery 1990; 107: 327-332.
20. Cainzos M, Potel J, Puente JL. Anergy in jaundiced patients. Br. J. Surg. 1988; 75: 147-149.
21. Cainzos M, Potel J, Puente JL. Anergy in patients with biliary lithiasis. Br. J. Surg.1989; 76: 169-172.
22. Cainzos M, Alcalde J.A, Potel J, Puente JL. Hyperbilirubinemia jaundice and anergy. Hepato-Gastroenterol. 1992; 39: 330-332.
23. Meijer WS, Schmitz PIM, Jeekel J. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery. Br. J. Surg. 77 (1990): 283-289.
24. Cainzos M, Garcia Zabarte A, Potel J, Puente JL. Detección de factores de riesgo de aparición de infección postoperatoria. Cir. Esp. 42 (1987): 253-259.
25. Reiss R, Eliashiv A, Deutsch AA. Septic complications and bile cultures in 800 consecutive cholecystectomies. World. J. Surg. 6 (1982): 195-199.
26. Brismar B, Jalakas K, Malmborg AS, Strandberg A. The significance of bacteriological findings at cholecystectomy. Acta Chir. scand. Suppl. 530 (1986): 35-38.
27. Stahlberg M, Laitinen S, Hentilä R, Kiviniemi H, Kairaluoma MI. Prophylactic cefamandole in low risk elective cholecystectomy. A short report. Surg. Res. Comm. 6 (1989): 177-180.
28. Wells GR, Taylos EW, Lindsay G, Morton L, and the West of Scotland Surgical Infection Study Group. Relationship between bile colonization high-risk factor and postoperative sepsis in patients undergoing biliary tract operations while receiving a prophylactic antibiotic. Br. J. Surg. 76 (1989): 374-377.
29. Burke JF. The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lessions. Surgery 50 (1961): 161-168.
30. Keighley MRB, Drysdale RB, Quoraishi AH, Burdon DW, Alexander-Williams J. Antibiotics in biliary disease: The relative importance of antibiotic concentrations in the bile and serum. Gut 17 (1976): 495-500.
31. Kellum JM, Gargano JS, Gorbach SL. Antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk biliary operations. Multicenter trial of single preoperative ceftriaxone versus multidose cefazolin. Am. J. Surg. 48 (1984): 15-18.
32. Drumm J, Donovan IA, Wise R. A comparison of cefotetan and cephazolin for prophylaxis against wound infection after elective cholecystectomy. J. Hosp. Infect. 6 (1985): 277-280.
33. Creenshaw ChA, Glanges E, Weber C, McReynolds DB. A prospective randomized double blind study of preventive cefamandole therapy in patients at high risk for undergoing cholecystectomy. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 153 (1981): 546-552.
34. Laguens G, Queralt CB, Miguelena JM, Celaya S, Lozano R. Profilaxis antibiotica de corta duracion en cirugia biliar. Estudio randomizado con cefamandol. Cir. Esp. 41 (1987): 102-106.
35. Wilson SE, Hopkins JA, Williams RA. A comparison of cefotaxime versus cefamandole in prophylaxis for surgical treatment of the biliary tract. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 164 (1987): 207-212.
36. Bolufer JM, Armañanzas E, Puchades F, Cervero P, Trullenque R, Cano J. Profilaxis antibiótica en cirugía biliar electiva? Indicación sistemática o electiva?. Rev. Quir. Esp. 14 (1987): 323-327.
37. Jensen LS, Andersen F, Gjode P, Kiil J, Klove-Mogensen M, Lauritzen NP, et al. Perioperative cefuroxime v. long-term ampicillin and metronidazole in high-risk biliary and gastric surgery. Acta Chir. Scand. 153 (1987): 193-197.
38. Maki DG, Lammers JL, Aughey DR. Comparative studies of multiple dose cefoxitin vs. single dose cefonicid for surgical prophylaxis in patients undergoing biliary tract operations and hysterectomy. Rev. Infect. Dis. 6 (1984): S887-895.
39. Kellum JM, Duma RJ, Gorbach SL, Sugerman HJ, Haynes BW, Gervin A, Newsome HH. Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for biliary surgery. Cefazolin vs moxalactam. Arch. Surg. 122 (1987): 918-922.
40. Roufail WM. Comparison of cefonicid and cefoxitin for prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery. Advances in Therapy 1985; 2: 225-232.
41. Berne TV, Yellin AE, Appleman MD, Gill MA, Chenella FC, Heseltine NR. Controlled comparison of cefmetazole with cefoxitin for prophylaxis in elective cholecystectomy. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet, 1990; 170: 137-140.
42. Hjortrup A, Moesgaard F, Johansen C, Nielsen R. Antibiotic prophylaxis in high risk biliary surgery: One dose of cetriaxone compared with two doses of cefuroxime. Eur. J. Surg. 1991; 157: 403-405.
43. Ambrose NS, Morris DL, Burdon MB, et al. Comparison of selective and non-selective antibiotic cover in biliary surgery. World J. Surg. 1986; 11: 101-104.
44. Krajden S, Yaman M, Fuksa M, Larger JC, Rowan J, Burul CJ, et al. Piperacillin versus cefazolin given periperatively to high-risk patients who undergo open cholecystectomy: A double-blind randomized trial. Canp. J. Surg. 1993; 36: 245-250.
45. Keighley MRB, Baddaley RM, Burdon DW, Edwards JAC, Quoraishi AH, Oates GD, et al. A controlled trial of parenteral prophylactic gentamicin therapy in biliary surgery. Br. J. Surg. 1975; 62: 275-279.
46. Cainzos M, Alcaraz P, Apecechea A, Balibrea JL, Bouzas E, Culebras J, y cols. Profilaxis antibiotica en la cirugia biliar. Encuesta nacional. Cir. Esp. 1992; 52: 86-91.
47. Cahill CJ and Pain JA. Current Practice in Biliary Surgery. Br. J.Surg. 1988; 75: 1169-1172.
48. Nichols RL. Antibiotic prophylaxis in biliary tract surgery. In Decision Making in Surgical Sepsis. Nichols RL, Hyslop NE, Bartlett JG. (eds). B.C. Decker Inc. Philadelphia (1991): 28-29.
49. Lewis RT, Barkun J. Infection in the upper abdomen: Biliary tract pancreas liver and spleen. In Surgical Infections. Diagnosis and Treatment. Meakins J.L. (ed). Scientific American Inc, New York (1994): 311-328.
50. Perissat J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: The European experience. Am. J. Surg. 1993; 165: 444-449.
51. Gadacz TR. U.S. experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg. 1993; 165: 450-545.
52. McMahon AJ, Ramsay G, Baxter JN, Galloway D. Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: A randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and pulmonary function. Surgery 1994; 115: 533-539.
53. Soper NJ, Barteau JA, Clayman RV, Ashley SW, Dunnegan DL. Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic versus standard open cholecystectomy. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1992; 174: 114-118.
54. Dubois F, Berthelot G, Levard H. Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: Experience with 2006 cases. World J. Surg. 1995; 19: 748-752.
55. Kum CK, Eypasch E, Lefering R, Paul A, Neugebauer E, Troidl H. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Is it really safe?. World J. Surg. 1996; 20: 43-49.
56. Computer program for audit for surgical infections. Medical Audit News 3 (1993): 104.
57. Computer program for the collection of information on surgical infections. Curr. Opin. Surg. Infect. 3 Suppl. 1 (1995) S54.
58. Geroulanos S. Infectious complications and risks in abdominal surgery: Early recognition and prevention. Hepato-Gastroenterol 1991; 38: 261-271.
59. Csendes A, Diaz JC, Burdiles P, Maluenda F, Morales E. Risk factors and classification of acute suppurative cholangitis. Br. J. Surg. 1992; 79: 655-658.