Successful treatment of severe oligozoospermia with sperm washing and intrauterine insemination

Journal of Andrology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 448-453

  Centola, Grace M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial insemination; Male infertility; Pregnancy rates; Sperm processing

Indexed keywords

CLOMIFENE CITRATE; FOLLITROPIN; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALE INFERTILITY; OLIGOSPERMIA; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; UTERINE TUBE;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; MALE; OLIGOSPERMIA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 0030830679     PISSN: 01963635     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allen NC, Herbert CM III, Maxson WS, Rogers BJ, Diamond MP, Wentz AC. Intrauterine insemination: a critical review. Fertil Steril 1985;44: 569-580.
2. Byrd W. Processing human semen for insemination: comparison of methods. In: Centola GM, Ginsburg KA, eds. Evaluation and Treatment of the Infertile Male. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1996: 39-107.
3. Byrd W, Ackerman GE, Carr BR, Edman CD, Guzick DS, McConnell JD. Treatment of refractory infertility by transcervical intrauterine insemination of washed spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1987;48:921-927.
4. Centola GM. Comparison of manual microscopic and computer-assisted methods for the analysis of sperm count and motility. Arch Androl 1996;36:1-7.
5. Centola GM, Frantz LF, Zavos PM. Comparison of pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination of sperm processed in Ham's F-10 medium versus synthetic human tubal fluid. Infertility 1992;15:84-96.
6. Chaffkin LM, Nulsen JC, Luciano AA, Metzger DA. A comparative analysis of the cycle fecundity rates associated with combined human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus either hMG or IUI alone. Fertil Steril 1991;55:252-257.
7. Comhaire F, Milingos S, Liapi A, Gordts S, Campo R, Depypere H, Dhont M, Schoonjans F. The effective cumulative pregnancy rate of different modes of treatment of male infertility. Andrologia 1995;27:217-221.
8. Cramer DW, Walker AM, Schiff I. Statistical methods in evaluating the outcome of infertility therapy. Fertil Steril 1979;32:80-87.
9. Crosignani PG, Walters DE. Clinical pregnancy and male subfertility; the ESHRE multicentre trial on the treatment of male subfertility. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1112-1118.
10. DeCherney AH. Infertility: we're not taking new patients! Fertil Steril 1995;64:470-473.
11. Dodson WC, Whitesides DB, Hughes CL, Easley HA, Haney AF. Superovulation with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility: a possible alternative to gamete intrafallopian transfer and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1987;48:441-445.
12. Farris EJ, Murphy DP. The characteristics of the two parts of the partitioned ejaculation and its use for intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1960;56:1183-1187.
13. Hammond MG. Artificial insemination: husband. In: Schlaff WD, Rock JA, eds. Decision Making in Reproductive Endocrinology. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1993:581-585.
14. Horvath PM, Bohrer M, Shelden RM, Kemmann E. The relationship of sperm parameters to cycle fecundity in superovulated women undergoing intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1989;52:288-294.
15. Hughes EG, Collins JP, Garner PR. Homologous artificial insemination for oligoasthenospermia: a randomized controlled study comparing intracervical and intrauterine techniques. Fertil Steril 1987;48:278-281.
16. Kerin J, Byrd W. Supracervical placement of spermatozoa: utility of intrauterine and tubal insemination. In: Soules MR, ed. Controversies in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. New York: Elsevier; 1989:183-204.
17. Kerin JFP, Peek J, Warnes GM, Kirby C, Jeffrey R, Matthews CD, Cox LW. Improved conception rate after intrauterine insemination of washed spermatozoa from men with poor quality semen. Lancet 1984;1:533-535.
18. Kerin J, Quinn P. Washed intrauterine insemination in the treatment of oligospermic infertility. Semin Reprod Endocrinol 1987;5:23-33.
19. Lalich RA, Marut EL, Prins GS, Scommegna A. Life table analysis of intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:980-984.
20. Mastroianni L Jr, Laberge JL, Rock L. Appraisal of the efficacy of artificial insemination with husband's sperm and evaluation of insemination technique. Fertil Steril 1957;8:260-266.
21. McClure RD, Nunes L, Tom R. Semen manipulation: improved sperm recovery and function with a two-layer percoll gradient. Fertil Steril 1989;51:874-877.
22. Mortimer D. Practical Laboratory Andrology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994:267-286.
23. Neumann PJ, Gharib SD, Weinstein MC. The cost of a successful delivery with in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 1994;331:239-243.
24. Quinn PJ, Kerin JF, Warnes GM. Improved pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization with the use of a medium based on the composition of human tubal fluid. Fertil Steril 1985;44:493.
25. Schlaff WD, Awoniyi CA. Intrauterine insemination for male factor. In: Centola GM, Ginsburg KA, eds. Evaluation and Treatment of the Infertile Male. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1996:72-88.
26. Sunde A, Kahn JA, Holne K. Intrauterine insemination: a European collaborative report. Hum Reprod 1988;3:69-73.
27. teVelde ER, vanKooy RJ, Waterreus JJH. Intrauterine insemination of washed husband's spermatozoa: a controlled study. Fertil Steril 1989;51:182-185.
28. Tucker MJ, Wong CJY, Chang YM, Leong KH, Leung CKM. Intrauterine insemination as frontline treatment for non-tubal infertility. Asia Oceania J Obst Gynecol 1990;16:137-143.