Suprapubic Percutaneous Cystostomy versus Urethral Catheterisation in Abdominal Surgery

Digestive Surgery

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 404-408

  Botsios, D ^a   Demetriades, Ch ^a   Goulimaris, I ^a   Kanellos, I ^a   Dadoukis, I ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Suprapubic catheterisation; Urethral catheterisation

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BALLOON CATHETER; BLADDER ASPIRATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOSTOMY; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS; FEMALE; HEMATURIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE TREATMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETHRA; URINE CATHETER; URINE CULTURE; URINE RETENTION;

EID: 0030828280     PISSN: 02534886     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000172583     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Peloso OA, Wilkinson LH, Floyd VT: Suprapubic bladder drainage in general surgery, Arch Surg 1973;106:568-571.
2. Sigel A, Schrott KM: Störung der Miktion nach allgemeinchirurgischcn Operationen, Langcn-becks Arch Chir 1977;345:563-568.
3. Shapiro J, Hoffmann J, Fersky J: A comparison of suprapubic and transurethral drainage for postoperative urinary retention in general surgical patients, Acta Chir Scand 1982:148:323-327.
4. Sethia KK, Selkon JB, Berry AT, et al: Prospective randomized controlled trial of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization, Br J Surg 1987;74:624-625.
5. Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Britt MR, et al: Mea-tal colonisation and catheter-associated bacte-riuria, N Engl J Med 1980:303:316-318.
6. Huskisson EC: Measurement of pain, Lancet 1974;ii:1127-1131.
7. Carson CC: Nosocomial urinary tract infections, Surg Clin North Am 1988:68:1147-1155.
8. Bryan CS, Reynolds KI,: Hospital aquircd bac-terentic urinary tract infection: epidemiology and outcome, J Urol 1984:132:494-498.
9. O'Kelly TJ, Ross MS, Munro A: Optimum method of urinary drainage in major abdominal surgery: A prospective randomized trial of suprapubic versus urethral catheterization, Br J Surg 1995:82:1367-1368.
10. Hodgkinson CP, Hodari AA: Trocar suprapubic cystostomy for postoperative bladder drainage in the female, Am J Obstct Gynecol 1966;9: 773-777.
11. Barham KA: Suprapubic bladder drainage in gynaecological surgery, Ausl NZ J Surg 1973; 43:32-36.
12. Morgan FA, Prasad B, Waldron JD, O’Sulivan CD: Acute urinary retention, Comparison of suprapubic and urethral catheterization, Br J Urol 1992;70:149-151.
13. Hilton P, Stanton SL: Suprapubic catheterization, Br Med J 1980:281:1261-1264.
14. Schbring C, Werner E: Hamableitung nach vaginalen gynäkologischen Operationen, Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1986:46:459-461.
15. Fciks A, Kosain K, Gruber W: Suprapuhische Blasendrainagc versus transurethralen Katheter bei Patientinnen nach vorderer Kolporrha-phie, Wien Klin Wochensehr 1987:99:268-272.
16. Ichran J, Hunt D: Suprapubic catheters: A comparison of suprapubic versus urethral catheters in the treatment of acute urinary retention, Aust NZJ Surg 1987:57:33-36.
17. Bonano PJ, Landers DE, Rock DE: Bladder drainage with the suprapubic needle, Obstet Gynecol 1970:35:807-813.
18. Browning DJ: Potential hazard of suprapubic catheterization, Med J Aust 1977:48:580-585.
19. Noller KL, Pratt JH, Symmonds RE: Bowel perforation with suprapubic cystostomy, Obstet Gynecol 1976:48:67-69.
20. Kanellos I, Agelopoulos S, Tsalis K, Botsios D, Dadoukis I: The suprapubic stab cathctcrisa-tion in surgical patients (prospective study), Acta Chir Hellen 1993;65:421-424.