DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction by image and flow cytometry in breast cancer fine-needle cytopunctures

Modern Pathology

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 556-563

  Spyratos, Frédérique ^a   Briffod, Marianne ^a  

^a CENTRE RENÉ HUGUENIN   (France)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; DNA content; Flow cytometry; Heterogeneity; Image cytometry; Proliferation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL POPULATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; DECISION MAKING; DNA CONTENT; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHEMICAL FRACTIONATION; DNA, NEOPLASM; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMANS; IMAGE CYTOMETRY; PLOIDIES; S PHASE;

EID: 0030825378     PISSN: 08933952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Briffod M, Spyratos F, Hacène K, Tubiana-Hulin M, Pallud C, Gilles F, et al. Evaluation of breast carcinomas chemosensitivity by flow cytometric DNA analysis and computer-assisted image analysis. Cytometry 1992;13:250-8.
2. Remvikos Y, Magdelénat H, Zajdéla A. DNA flow cytometry applied to fine-needle sampling of human breast cancer. Cancer 1988;61:1629-34.
3. Spyratos F, Briffod M. Fine-needle cytopuncture and flow cytometry in the characterization of human tumors. Methods in Cell Biology 1994;42:177-92.
4. Baisch H, Gohde W, Linden WA. Analysis of PCP data to determine the fraction of cells in the various phases of cell cycle Radiat Environ Biophys 1975;12:31-9.
5. Bach BA, Knape WA, Edinger MG, Tubbs RR. Improved sensitivity and resolution in the flow cytometric DNA analysis of human solid tumor specimens. Use of in vitro fine-needle aspiration and uniform staining reagents. Am J Clin Pathol 1991;96:615-27.
6. Hedley DW, Clark GM, Cornelisse CJ, Killander D, Kute T, Merkel D. Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA cytometry in carcinoma of the breast. Cytometry 1993;14: 482-5.
7. Böking A, Giroud F, Reith A. Consensus report of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology Task Force on standardisation of diagnostic DNA image cytometry. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1995;17:1-7.
8. Uyterlinde AM, Baak JPA, Schipper NW, Peterse H, Matze E, Meijer CJL. Further evaluation of the prognostic value of morphometric and flow cytometric parameters in breast-cancer patients with long follow-up. Int J Cancer 1990;45: 1-7.
9. Verdoodt B, Castelain P, Bourgain C, Kirsch-Volders M. Improved detection of DNA aneuploidy in primary breast cancer using quantitative DNA image analysis in combination with fluorescent in situ hybridization technique. Histochemical J 1995;27:79-88.
10. Kiss R, Gasperin P, Verhest A, Pasteels JL. Modification of tumor ploidy level via the choice of tissue taken as diploid reference in the digital cell image analysis of Feulgen-stained nuclei. Mod Pathol 1992;5:655-60.
11. Dutrillaux B, Gerbault-Seureau M, Remvikos Y, Zafrani B, Prieur M. Breast cancer genetic evolution: I. Data from cytogenetics and DNA content. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1991; 19:245-55.
12. Shackney SE, Burholt DR, Pollice AA, Smith CA, Pugh RP, Hartsock RJ. Discrepancies between flow cytometric and cytogenetic studies in the detection of aneuploidy in human solid tumors. Cytometry 1990;11:94-104.
13. Elsheikh TM, Silverman JF, McCool JW, Riley RS. Comparative DNA analysis of solid tumors by flow cytometric and image analyses of touch imprints and flow cell suspensions. Am J Clin Pathol 1992;98:296-304.
14. Baldetorp B, Fernö M, Fallenius A, Fallenius-Vecchi G, Idvall I, Olsson H, et al. Image cytometric DNA analysis in human breast cancer analysis may add prognostic information in diploid cases with low S-phase fraction by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1992;13:577-85.
15. Bauer TW, Tubbs SRR, Edinger MG. A prospective comparison of DNA quantitation by image and flow cytometry. Am J Clin Pathol 1990;93:322-6.
16. Cornelisse CJ, De Koning HR, Moolenaar AJ, Van de Velde CJ, Ploem JS. Image and flow cytometric analysis of DNA content in breast cancer. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1984;6:9-18.
17. Dawson AE, Norton JA, Weinberg D. Comparative assessment of proliferation and DNA content in breast carcinoma by image analysis and flow cytometry. Am J Pathol 1990;136: 1115-24.
18. Falkmer UG, Hagmar T, Auer G. Efficacy of combined image and flow cytometric DNA assessments in human breast cancer: a methodological study based on a routine histopathological material of 2024 excised tumour specimens. Anal Cell Pathol 1990;2:297-312.
19. Fossa SD, Thorud E, Vaage S, Shoaib MC. DNA cytometry of primary breast cancer comparison of microspectrophotometry and flow cytometry, and different preparation methods for flow cytometric measurements. Acta Path Microbiol Immunol Scand Sect A 1983;91:235-43.
20. Ghalil VS, Liau S, Teplitz C, Prudente R. A comparative study of DNA ploidy in 115 fresh-frozen breast carcinomas by image analysis versus flow cytometry. Cancer 1992;70:2668-72.
21. Lajoie G, Zbieranowski I, Demaniuk C, Knape WA, Edinger MG, Tubbs RR, et al. A comparative study of DNA quantitation in breast carcinoma with image cytometric analysis and in vitro fine-needle aspiration with flow cytometric analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 1993;100:456-62.
22. Wilbur DC, Zakowski MF, Kosciol CM, Sojda DF, Pastuszak WT. DNA ploidy in breast lesions. A comparative study using two commercial image analysis systems and flow cytometry. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1990;12:28-34.
23. Bertino B, Knape WA, Pylinska M, Strauss K, Hammou JC. A comparative study of DNA content as measured by flow cytometry and image analysis in 1864 specimens. Anal Cell Pathol 1994;6:377-94.
24. Ellison DA, Maygarden SJ, Novotny DB. Quantitative DNA analysis of fresh solid tumors by flow and image cytometric methods: a comparison using the Roche pathology workstation image analyser. Mod Pathol 1995;3:275-81.
25. Bonsing BA, Beerman H, Kuipers-Dijkshoorn N, Fleuren GJ, Comelisse CJ. High levels of DNA index heterogeneity in advanced breast carcinomas. Evidence for DNA ploidy differences between lymphatic and hematogenous metastases. Cancer 1993;71:382-92.
26. Lanigan D, McLean PA, Curran B, Leader M. Comparison of flow and static image cytometry in the determination of ploidy. J Clin Pathol 1993;46:135-9.
27. Aasmundstad TA, Haugen OA. DNA ploidy in intraductal breast carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1990;26:956-9.
28. Fisher ER, Siderits R. Value of cytometric analysis for distinction of intraductal carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1992;21:165-72.
29. Visscher DW, Shaheen C, Drozdowicz JD. Image cytomorphometric DNA histogram heterogeneity in adenocarcinoma of the breast. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1993;15:206-12.
30. Briffod M, Le Doussal V, Spyratos F. Cytologic nuclear grading of fine-needle cytopunctures of breast carcinomas. Comparison with histologic nuclear grading and image cytometric data. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1997;19:114-22.
31. Stäl O, Klintenberg C, Franzen G, Risberg B, Arvidsson S, Bjelkenkrantz K, et al. A comparison of static cytofluorometry for the estimation of ploidy and DNA replication in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1986;7:15-22.
32. Longin A, Fontanière B, Pinzani V, Catimel G, Souchier C, Clavel M, et al. An image cytometric DNA-analysis in breast neoplasms. Parameters of DNA aneuploidy and their relationship with conventional prognostic factors. Path Res Pract 1992;188:466-72.
33. Taylor SR, Zachariah S, Chakraborty S, Overstreet J, Ramzy I, Mody DR. Ploidy studies by image analysis on fine-needle aspirates of the breast. Acta Cytol 1993;37:923-8.
34. Luzi P, Bruni A, Mangiavacchi P, Cevenini G, Marini D, Tosi P. Ploidy pattern and cell cycle in breast cancer as detected by image analysis and flow cytometry. Cytometry 1994;18: 79-87.
35. Montironi R, Diamanti L, Santinelli A, Galluzzi M, Scarpelli M, Giannulis I, et al. Computed cell cycle and DNA histogram analyses in image cytometry in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 1993;46:795-800.
36. Montironi R, Diamanti L, Santinelli A, Scarpelli M. Computer-aided S-phase fraction determination in DNA static cytometry in breast cancer: a preliminary methodologic study on cytologic material. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1992;14:379-85.
37. Danque POV, Chen HB, Patil J, Jagirdar J, Orsatti G, Paronetto F. Image analysis versus flow cytometry for DNA ploidy quantitation of solid tumors: a comparison of six methods of sample preparation. Mod Pathol 1993;6:270-5.
38. Susnik B, Poulin N, Phillips D, LeRiche J, Palcic B. Comparison of DNA measurement performed by flow and image cytometry of embedded breast tissue sections. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1995;17:163-71.
39. Spyratos F, Briffod M, Gentile A, Brunet M, Brault C, Desplaces A. Flow cytometric study of DNA distribution in cytopunctures of benign and malignant breast lesions. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1987;9:485-94.
40. D'Hautcourt JL, Spyratos F, Chassevent A. Quality control study by the French Cytometry Association on flow cytometric DNA content and S-phase fraction. Cytom Comm Clin Cytom 1996;26:32-9.