How community pharmacists label medicines prescribed without appropriate dosage instructions

Journal of Social and Administrative Pharmacy

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 180-184

  Rogers, Philip J ^a   Rees, John E ^a,b  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Pharmacy Practice ^*

Author keywords

Great Britain; Labelling; Pharmacists community; Prescriptions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DRUG INFORMATION; DRUG LABELING; PATIENT INFORMATION; PHARMACIST; PRESCRIPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0030825107     PISSN: 02810662     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. British National Formulary, Number 31. London: British Medical Association / Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 1996.
2. General Medical Services Committee/ Royal College of General Practitioners Joint Computing Policy Group. Standards for computer issued prescriptions. Br Med J 1985; 290: 1252-1253.
3. Rogers PJ, Baxter K, Fletcher G. Computer generated prescriptions - An improvement on hand writing? Pharm J 1991; 247: R29.
4. Rogers PJ, Fletcher G, Rees JE. The labelling of prescriptions presented with incomplete dosage directions. Pharm J 1992; 249: R38.
5. Rogers PJ, Rees JE. Comparison of the use of PMRs in 1991 and 1995: (1) PMR use and recording of product details. Pharm J 1996; 256: 161-166.
6. Rogers PJ, Rees JE. Comparison of the use of PMRs in 1991 and 1995: (2) The recording of patients' details. Pharm J 1996; 256: 491-495.