The comparative solvatochromism of arylazo and heteroarylazo compounds based on N,N-diethyl-m-acetylaminoaniline and N,N-diethyl-m-toluidine

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 3, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 1719-1727

  Hutchings, Michael G ^a   Gregory, Peter ^b   Campbell, James S ^b   Strong, Andrew ^b   Zamy, Jean Paul ^c   Lepre, Anne ^c   Mills, Andrew ^c  

^a BASF SE   (Germany)

^b ASTRAZENECA   (United Kingdom)

^c SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Azo compounds; Correlation analysis; Dyes; Heterocycles; Solvato chromism

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030822080     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.19970031021     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. P. Gregory, D. Thorp, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1979, 1990.
2. a) B. Marcandalli, I. R. Bellobono, E. Selli, A. Polissi, Dyes and Pigments 1987, 19, 239;
3. b) D.-M. Shin, D. G. Whitten, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5206;
4. c) D.-M. Shin, K. S. Schanze, D. G. Whitten, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8494;
5. d) N. Nishimura, T. Tanaka, M. Asano, Y. Sueishi, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1986, 1839;
6. e) S. Kobayashi, H. Yokoyama, H. Kamei, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1987, 138, 333;
7. f) H. Mustroph, J. Epperlein, J. Prakt. Chem. 1980, 322, 305;
8. g) B. Marcandalli, E. Dubina-Paglia, L. Pelliciari-Di Liddo, Gazz, Chim. Ital. 1981, 111, 187;
9. h) A. T. Peters, A. Gbadamosi, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1992, 53, 301-308.
10. C. Laurence, P. Nicolet, M. T. Dalati, J.-L. M. Abboud, R. Notario, J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 5807.
11. G. McGeorge, R. K. Harris, A. M. Chippendale, J. F. Bullock, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1996, 1733.
12. C. Reichardt, Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry, VCH, Weinheim, 1988.
13. M. J. Kamlet, J.-L. M. Abboud, R. W. Taft, Prog. Phys. Org. Chem. 1981, 13, 485.
14. R. W. Taft, J.-L. M. Abboud, M. J. Kamlet, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 1080; R. W. Taft, M. J. Kamlet, Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 250.
15. R. W. Taft, J.-L. M. Abboud, M. J. Kamlet, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 1080; R. W. Taft, M. J. Kamlet, Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 250.
16. Y. Marcus, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 22, 409.
17. We are aware of a more recent compilation of π* values (ref. [3]). However, we have chosen not to rely on these since no comparable values are given for hydroxylic solvents, and nor is it clear that older α and β values are consistent with these newer π* values. See, however, ref. [11].
18. J. Griffiths, Colour and Constitution of Organic Molecules, Academic Press, London, 1976, p. 76.
19. A=T values.
20. PISYSTEM for Windows, v 3.1 (1994), R. Naef, Im Budler 6, CH-4419 Lupsingen, Switzerland . This program has been reviewed in: M. G. Hutchings, Dyes & Pigments 1995, 29, 95.
21. PISYSTEM for Windows, v 3.1 (1994), R. Naef, Im Budler 6, CH-4419 Lupsingen, Switzerland . This program has been reviewed in: M. G. Hutchings, Dyes & Pigments 1995, 29, 95.
22. E. G. McRae, J. Phys. Chem. 1957, 61, 562; W. Liptay, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 177; W. Liptay in Modern Quantum Chemistry, Part 2 (Ed.: O. Sinanoglu), Academic Press, New York, 1965, p. 173.
23. E. G. McRae, J. Phys. Chem. 1957, 61, 562; W. Liptay, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 177; W. Liptay in Modern Quantum Chemistry, Part 2 (Ed.: O. Sinanoglu), Academic Press, New York, 1965, p. 173.
24. E. G. McRae, J. Phys. Chem. 1957, 61, 562; W. Liptay, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 177; W. Liptay in Modern Quantum Chemistry, Part 2 (Ed.: O. Sinanoglu), Academic Press, New York, 1965, p. 173.
25. F. Effenberger, F. Würthner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 719; F. Effenberger, F. Würthner, F. Steybe, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2082.
26. F. Effenberger, F. Würthner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 719; F. Effenberger, F. Würthner, F. Steybe, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2082.
27. 01 term is a vector dot product and therefore dependent on the angle between the dipole vectors. In fact, the PPP-calculated ground-state and first excited-state dipole vectors are essentially in the same direction, so the scalar assumption is valid, at least to the same extent as the other approximations which have been made.
28. W. E. Stewart, T. H. Siddall III, Chem. Rev. 1970, 70, 517; V. P. Manea, K. J. Wilson, J. R. Cable, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2033.
29. W. E. Stewart, T. H. Siddall III, Chem. Rev. 1970, 70, 517; V. P. Manea, K. J. Wilson, J. R. Cable, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2033.
30. R. W. Taft, M. J. Kamlet, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1979, 1723.
31. F. H. Allen, J. E. Davies, O. J. Johnson, O. Kennard, C. F. Macrae, E. M. Mitchell, G. F. Mitchell, J. M. Smith, D. Watson, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1991, 31, 187.
32. 2) = 0.21±0.14; cf. literature values 0.44, 0.30, respectively (ref. [8]). Thus these new α values are not recommended.
33. E. Buncel, S. Rajagopal, J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 798; E. Buncel, S. Rajagopal, Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23, 226.
34. E. Buncel, S. Rajagopal, J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 798; E. Buncel, S. Rajagopal, Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23, 226.
35. a) R. S. Drago, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1992, 1827;
36. b) R. S. Drago, J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 6547;
37. c) R. S. Drago, M. S. Hirsch, D. C. Ferris, C. W. Chronister, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 219;
38. d) R. S. Drago, Applications of Electrosiatic-Covalent Models in Chemistry, Surfside Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, 1994.
39. M. G. Hutchings, unpublished results.
40. Statistica/w, from StatSoft, Inc., 2325 East 13th Street, Tulsa, OK 74104 (USA).
41. J. Pancir, I. Matoušek, R. Zahradnik, Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1973, 38, 3039.