Structure of feeding palps and feeding behavior of the spionid polychaete Polydora polybranchia

Bulletin of Marine Science

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 502-511

  Qian, Pei Yuan ^a   Chia, Fu Shiang ^b  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDING BEHAVIOUR; FEEDING PALP STRUCTURE; ORGANISM MORPHOLOGY; PALP STRUCTURE; PARTICLE SELECTION;

POLYCHAETA; POLYDORA POLYBRANCHIA;

EID: 0030821718     PISSN: 00074977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Banse, K. and K. D. Hobson. 1981. Sedentariate and archiannelid polychaetes of British Columbia and Washington. Bull. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 144 p.
2. Breese, W. P. and F. D. Phibbs. 1972. Ingestion of bivalve molluscan larvae by the polychaete annelid Polydora ligni. Veliger. 14: 274.
3. Cameron, J. Lane and P. V. Fankboner. 1984. Tentacle structure and feeding processes in life stages on the commercial sea cucumber Parastichopus californicus (Stimpson). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 81: 193-209.
4. Daro, M. H. and P. Polk. 1971. The autecology of Polydora ciliata along the Belgian coast. Neth. J. Sea Res. 6: 130-140.
5. Dauer, D. M. 1983. Functional morphology and feeding behavior of Scolelepis squamata (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Mar. Biol. 77: 279-285.
6. _. 1984. Functional morphology and feeding behavior of Streblospio benedicti (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Proc. 1st. Intl. Polychaete Conf., Published by the Linnean Society of New South Wales, p. 418-429.
7. _. 1985. Functional morphology and feeding behavior of Paraprionospio pinnata (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Mar. Biol., 85: 143-151.
8. _. 1987. Systematic significance of the morphology of spionid polychaete palps. Biol. Soc. Wash. Bull. 7: 41-45.
9. _. 1991. Functional morphology and feeding behavior of Polydora commensalis (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Ophelia suppl. 5: 607-614.
10. _. 1994. Functional ciliary groups of the feeding palps of spionid polychaetes. Pages 81-84 in: J. C. Dauvin, L. Laubier and D. J. Reish, eds. Actes de la 4éme Conférence internationale des Polychétes. Mém. Mus. Natn. Hist. Nat. 162.
11. _ and R. M. Ewing. 1991. Functional morphology and feeding behavior of Malacoceros indicus (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Bull. Mar. Sci. 48: 395-400.
12. _, C. A. Maybury, and R. M. Ewing. 1981. Feeding behavior and general ecology of several spionid polychaetes from the Chesapeake Bay. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 54: 21-38.
13. Frankboner, P. V. 1978. Suspension-feeding mechanisms of armored sea cucumber Psolus chitionoides Clark. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 31: 11-25.
14. Hartman, O. 1969. Atlas of the sedentariate polychaetous annelids from California. Allan Hancock Fdn., Los Angeles, Calif. 812 p.
15. Hempel, C. 1957. Über den rohrenbau und die Nahrungsaufnahme einiger Spioniden (Polychaeta sedentaria) der deutschen Küsten. Helgolån-der Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchunger. 6 10: 100-135.
16. Jumars, P. A., R. F. L. Seft, and A. R. M. Nowell. 1982. Mechanics of particle selection by tentaculate deposit-feeders. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 64: 47-70.
17. Levin, L. A. 1981. Dispersion, feeding behavior and competition in two spionid polychaetes. J. Mar. Res. 39: 99-117.
18. Miller, D. C. 1986. Mechanical post-capture particle selection by suspension-and deposit-feeding Corophium. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 82: 59-76.
19. Self, R. F. L. & P. A. Jumars. 1978. New resource axes for deposit feeders? J. Mar. Res. 36: 627-641.
20. Taghon, G. L. 1982. Optimal foraging by deposit-feeding invertebrates: role of particle size and organic coating. Oecologia 52: 295-304.
21. _, A. R. M. Nowell and P. A. Jumars. 1980. Induction of suspension feeding in spionid polychaetes by high particle fluxes. Science, 210: 562-564.
22. Whitlatch, L. B. and J. R. Weinberg. 1982. Factors influencing particle selection and feeding rate in the polychaete Cistenides (Pectinaria) gouldii. Mar. Biol. 71: 33-40.
23. Wilson, H. H., Jr. 1983. The role of density dependence in a marine infaunal community. Ecol. 63: 295-306.