Neuromagnetic fields reveal cortical plasticity when learning an auditory discrimination task

Brain Research

Volumn 764, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 53-66

  Cansino, Selene ^a   Williamson, Samuel J ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Association auditory cortex; Auditory discrimination; Cortical plasticity; Learning; Magnetic source imaging (MSI); Magnetoencephalography (MEG); Primary auditory cortex

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION CORTEX; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CASE REPORT; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 0030820289     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(97)00321-1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. J.S. Bakin, B. Lepan, N.M. Weinberger, Sensitization induced receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex is independent of CS modality, Brain Res. 577 (1992) 226-235.
2. J.S. Bakin, M.N. Weinberger, Classical conditioning induces CS-specific receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig, Brain Res. 536 (1990) 271-286.
3. S. Cansino, S.J. Williamson, D. Karron, Tonotopic organization of human auditory association cortex, Brain Res. 663 (1994) 38-50.
4. K.T. Ciesielski, C.N. French, Event-related potentials before and after training: chronometry and lateralization of visual N1 and N2, Biol. Psychol. 28 (1989) 227-238.
5. M.G.H. Coles, G. Gratton, T.R. Bashore, C.W. Eriksen, E. Donchin, A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing, J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 11 (1985) 529-533.
6. E. Donchin, G. Gratton, D. Dupree, M. Coles, After a rash action: latency and amplitude of the P300 following fast guesses, in: G.C. Galbraith, M.L. Kietzman, E. Donchin (Eds.), Neurophysiology and Psychophysiology: Experimental and Clinical Applications, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988, pp. 173-188.
7. J.M. Edeline, Frequency-specific plasticity of single unit discharges in the rat medial geniculate body, Brain Res. 529 (1990) 109-119.
8. J.M. Edeline, N.M. Weinberger, Receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex during frequency discrimination training: selective retuning independent of task difficulty, Behav. Neurosci. 107 (1993) 82-103.
9. M. Falkenstein, J. Hohnsbein, J. Hoormann, L. Blanke, Effects of cross-modal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 78 (1991) 447-455.
10. D. Hugdahl, H. Nordby, Hemisphere differences in conditional learning: an ERP study, Cortex 27 (1991) 557-570.
11. W.M. Jenkins, M.M. Merzenich, G. Recanzone, Neocortical representational dynamics in adult primates: implications for neuropsychology, Neuropsychologia 28 (1990) 573-584.
12. J.H. Kaas, Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 14 (1991) 137-167.
13. A. Karni, G. Meyer, P. Jezzard, M.M. Adams, R. Turner, L.G. Ungerleider, Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning, Nature 377 (1995) 155-158.
14. H. Levitt, Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49 (1971) 467-477.
15. Z.-L. Lu, S.J. Williamson, L. Kaufman, Human auditory primary and association cortex have differing lifetimes for activation traces, Brain Res. 572 (1992) 236-241.
16. J. Moeller, The contrast measure, in: B.M. Luber, Neural Activity of the Cerebral Cortex Related to Visual Spatial Attention in Discrimination Tasks, Ph.D. Thesis, New York University, New York, 1992.
17. S.E. Molchan, T. Sunderland, A.R. McIntosh, P. Herscovitch, B.G. Schreurs, A functional anatomical study of associative learning in humans, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91 (1994) 8122-8126.
18. R. Parasuraman, D.R. Davies, Response and evoked potential latencies associated with commission errors in visual monitoring, Percept. Psychophysiol. 17 (1975) 465-468.
19. G.H. Recanzone, C.E. Schreiner, M.M. Merzenich, Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys, J. Neurosci. 13 (1993) 87-103.
20. B. Renault, R. Ragot, N. Lesèvre, Correct and incorrect responses in a choice reaction time task and the endogenous components of the evoked potential, in: H.H. Kornhuber, L. Deecke (Eds.), Motivation, Motor and Sensory Processes of the Brain: Electrical Potentials, Behaviour and Clinical Use, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1980, pp. 647-654.
21. Y. Sakurai, Cells in the rat auditory system have sensory-delay correlates during the performance of an auditory working memory task, Behav. Neurosci. 104 (1990) 856-868.
22. Y. Sakurai, Involvement of auditory cortical and hippocampal neurons in auditory working memory and reference memory in the rat, J. Neurosci. 14 (1994) 2606-2623.
23. R.M. Shiffrin, W. Schneider, Controlled and automatic human information processing. II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and general theory, Psychol. Rev. 84 (1977) 127-190.
24. R. Vogels, G.A. Orban, Does practice in orientation discrimination lead to changes in the response properties of macaque inferior temporal neurons?, Eur. J. Neurosci. 6 (1994) 1680-1690.
25. N.M. Weinberger, Dynamic regulation of receptive fields and maps in the adult sensory cortex, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18 (1995) 129-158.
26. S.J. Williamson, L. Kaufman, Advances in neuromagnetic instrumentation and studies of spontaneous brain activity, Brain Topogr. 2 (1989) 129-139.
27. E. Zohary, S. Celebrini, K.H. Britten, W.T. Newsome, Neuronal plasticity that underlies improvement in perceptual performance, Science 263 (1994) 1289-1292.