Rethinking the use of auditory brainstem response in acoustic neuroma screening

Laryngoscope

Volumn 107, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 1388-1392

  Zappia, John J ^a,b   O'Connor, Cathleen A ^a   Wiet, Richard J ^a,b   Dinces, Elizabeth A ^b  

^a Chicago Otology Group   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NEURINOMA; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; TUMOR VOLUME;

AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROMA, ACOUSTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0030819977     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199710000-00018     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Gordon ML, Cohen NL. Efficacy of auditory brainstem response as a screening test for small acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 1995;16:136-9.
2. Chandrasekhar SS, Brackmann DE, Devgan KKZ. Utility of auditory brainstem response audiometry in diagnosis of acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 1995;16:63-7.
3. Bauch CD, Olsen WO, Pool AF. ABR Indices: sensitivity and specificity and tumor size. Am Speech Language Hear Assoc 1996;5:97-104.
4. Welling DB, Glasscock ME, Woods CI, et al. Acoustic neuroma: a cost-effective approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;103:364-70.
5. Jewett D, Romano M, Williston J. Human auditory evoked potentials: possible brain stem components detected on the scalp. Science 1970;167:1517-8.
6. Selters WA, Brackmann DE. Acoustic tumor detection with brainstem electric response audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1977;103:181-7.
7. Barrs DM, Brackmann DE, Olson JE, House WF. Changing concepts of acoustic neuroma diagnosis. Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:17-21.
8. Musiek FE, McCormick CA, Hurley RM. Hit and false alarm rates of selected ABR indices in differentiating cochlear disorders from acoustic tumors. Am Speech Language Hear Assoc 1996;5:90-6.
9. Josey AF. Audiologic manifestations of tumors of the VIIIth nerve. Ear Hear 1987;8(suppl 4):19s-21s.
10. Wilson DF, Hodgson RS, Gustafson MF, et al. The sensitivity of auditory brainstem response testing in small acoustic neuromas. Laryngoscope 1992;102:961-4.
11. Musiek FE, Gollegly KM. ABR in eight nerve and low brain-stem lesions. In: Jacobson JT, ed. The Auditory Brainstem Response. San Diego: College Hill; 1985:181-202.
12. Clemis J, McGee T. Brainstem electrical response audiometry and the differential diagnosis of acoustic tumors. Laryngoscope 1979;89:31-42.
13. Telian SA, Kileny PR, Niparko JK, et al. Normal auditory brainstem response in patients with acoustic neuroma. Laryngoscope 1989;99:10-4.
14. Burkey JM, Rizer FM, Schuring EG, et al. Acoustic reflexes, ABR and MRI in evaluation of acoustic neuromas. Laryngoscope 1996;106:839-41.
15. Robson AK, Leighton SEJ, Anslow P, et al. MRI as a single screening procedure for acoustic neuroma: a cost-effective protocol. J R Acad Med 1993;86:455-7.
16. Shelton C, Brackmann DE, House WF, et al. Acoustic tumor surgery: prognostic factors in hearing conservation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:1213-6.
17. Dornhoffer JL, Helms J, Hoehmann DH. Hearing preservation in acoustic tumor surgery: results and prognostic factors. Laryngoscope 1995;105:184-7.