Comparison of survey and physician claims data for detecting hypertension

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 711-718

  Muhajarine, Nazeem ^a,b   Mustard, Cameron ^b,c   Roos, Leslie L ^b,c   Young, T Kue ^b,c   Gelskey, Dale E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b ST BONIFACE GENERAL HOSPITAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Administrative data; Clinical data; Data linkage; Health surveys; Hypertension; Validity

Indexed keywords

CHOLESTEROL;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA BASE; DEMOGRAPHY; DIABETES MELLITUS; EDUCATION; EMPLOYMENT; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; FEMALE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPERTENSION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OBESITY; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SELF REPORT;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; INSURANCE, HEALTH; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PHYSICIANS; PREVALENCE;

EID: 0030811936     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00019-X     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. 1. Anderson GM, Grumbach K, Luft HS, Roos LL, Mustard C, Brook R. Use of coronary artery bypass surgery in the United States and Canada: Influence of age and income. JAMA 1993; 269: 1661-1666.
2. 2. Mustard CA, Roos NP. The relationship of prenatal care and pregnancy complications to birthweight in Winnipeg, Canada. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 1450-1457.
3. 3. Roos LL, Fisher ES, Sharp SM, Newhouse JP, Anderson G, Bubolz TA. Postsurgical mortality in Manitoba and New England. JAMA 1990; 263: 2453-2458.
4. 4. Roos NP, Roos LL. Small area variations, practice style, and quality of care. In: Wenzel RP, Ed. Assessing Quality Health Care: Perspective for Clinicians. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1992: 223-238.
5. 5. Wennberg JE, Roos NP, Sola L, Schori A, Jaffe R. Use of claims data systems to evaluate health care outcomes: Mortality and reoperation following prostatectomy. JAMA 1987; 257: 933-936.
6. 6. Roos LL, Mustard CA, Nicol JP, McLerran DF, Malenka DJ, Young TK, Cohen MM. Registries and administrative data: Organization and accuracy. Med Care 1993; 31: 201-212.
7. 7. Young TK, Roos NP, Hammarstrand KM. Estimated burden of diabetes mellitus in Manitoba according to health insurance claims: A pilot study. Can Med Assoc J 1991; 144: 318-324.
8. 8. Quam L, Ellis LBM, Venus P, Clouse J, Taylor CG, Leatherman S. Using claims data for epidemiologic research. The concordance of claims-based criteria with the medical record and patient survey for identifying a hypertensive population. Med Care 1993; 31: 498-507.
9. 9. Colditz GA, Martin P, Stampfer MJ, Willett EC, Sampson L, Rosner B, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE. Validation of questionnaire information in risk factors and disease outcomes in a prospective cohort study of women. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 123: 894-900.
10. 10. Coulter A, McPherson K, Elliott S, Whiting B. Accuracy of recall of surgical histories: A comparison of postal survey data and general practice records. Commun Medicine 1985; 7: 186-189.
11. 11. Paganini-Hill A, Ross RK. Reliability of recall of drug usage and other health-related information. Am J Epimediol 1982; 116: 114-122.
12. 12. Harlow SD, Linet MS. Agreement between questionnaire data and medical records. The evidence for accuracy of recall. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129: 233-248.
13. 13. Health and Welfare Canada. The Canadian Heart Health Initiative: A policy in action. Health Promotion 1992; 30: 1-19.
14. 14. Young TK, Gelskey DE, Macdonald SM, Hook E, Hamilton S. The Manitoba Heart Health Survey: Technical Report. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Department of Community Health Sciences, 1991.
15. 15. Roos NP. Impact of the organization of practice on quality of care and physician productivity. Med Care 1980; 18: 347-359.
16. 16. Joffres MR, Hamet P, Rabkin SW, Gelskey D, Hogan K, Fodor G. Canadian Heart Health Surveys Research Group. Prevalence, control and awareness of high blood pressure among Canadian adults. Can Med Assoc J 1992; 146: 1997-2009.
17. 17. Health and Welfare Canada. Main Findings Report of the Canadian Blood Pressure Survey. Ottawa, Ontario: 1989.
18. 18. Canadian Consensus Conference on Cholesterol. Final report. Can Med Assoc J 1988; 139(Suppl.): 1-8.
19. 19. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley; 1981.
20. 20. Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 543-549.
21. 21. Cicchetti DV, Feinstein AR. High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 551-558.
22. 22. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
23. 23. SAS Institute, Inc. Statistical Analysis System: User's Guide. 6th ed., version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 1989.
24. 24. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174.
25. 25. Jollis JG, Ancukiewicz M, DeLong ER, Pryor DB, Muhlbaier LH, Mark DB. Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems: Implications for outcomes research. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 844-850.
26. 26. Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB, Eds. Handbook of Survey Research. New York: Academic Press; 1983.
27. 27. Sudman S, Bradburn N. Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Synthesis. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1974.
28. 28. Corwin RG, Krober M, Roth HP. Patients' accuracy in reporting their past medical history. A study of 90 patients with peptic ulcer. J Chron Dis 1971; 23: 874-879.
29. 29. Rosner B, Pol BF. Predictive values of routine blood pressure measurements in screening for hypertension. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 117: 429-442.
30. 30. Studney DR, Hakstian AR. A comparison of medical record with billing diagnostic information associated with ambulatory medical care. Am J Public Health 1981; 71: 145-149.
31. 31. Shapiro E, Tate RB. Is health care use changing? A comparison between physician, hospital, nursing-home, and homecare use of two elderly cohorts. Med Care 1989; 27: 1002-1014.
32. 32. Linet MS, Harlow SD, McLaughlin JK, McCaffrey LD. A comparison of interview data and medical records for previous medical conditions and surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 1207-1213.
33. 33. Bush TL, Miller SR, Golden AL, Hale WE. Self-report and medical record report agreement of selected medical conditions in the elderly. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 1554-1556.
34. 34. Romano PS, Roos LL, Luft HS, Jollis JG, Doliszny K. A comparison of administrative versus clinical data: Coronary artery bypass surgery as an example. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 249-260.