Activation of the G protein Gq/11 through tyrosine phosphorylation of the α subunit

Science

Volumn 276, Issue 5320, 1997, Pages 1878-1881

  Umemori, Hisashi ^a   Inoue, Takafumi ^a   Kume, Shoen ^a   Sekiyama, Naohiro ^b   Nagao, Motoshi ^c   Itoh, Hiroshi ^c   Nakanishi, Shigetada ^b   Mikoshiba, Katsuhiko ^a   Yamamoto, Tadashi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM ION; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE;

ALPHA CHAIN; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CALCIUM CELL LEVEL; CALCIUM MOBILIZATION; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CHO CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME INHIBITION; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; RECEPTOR BINDING; XENOPUS;

ANIMALS; CALCIUM; CARBACHOL; CELL LINE; CHO CELLS; CRICETINAE; ENZYME INHIBITORS; GENISTEIN; GTP-BINDING PROTEINS; INOSITOL 1,4,5-TRISPHOSPHATE; ISOFLAVONES; PHOSPHORYLATION; PHOSPHOTYROSINE; PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASES; RECEPTORS, CHOLINERGIC; RECEPTORS, METABOTROPIC GLUTAMATE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 0030810745     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.276.5320.1878     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. M. J. Berridge, Nature 361, 315 (1993); D. E. Clapham, Cell 80, 259 (1995).
2. M. J. Berridge, Nature 361, 315 (1993); D. E. Clapham, Cell 80, 259 (1995).
3. E. J. Neer, Cell 80, 249 (1995).
4. H. E. Hamm and A. Gilchrist, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 189 (1996).
5. M. I. Simon, M. P. Strathmann, N. Gautam, Science 252, 802 (1991); Y. Kaziro, H. Itoh, T. Kozasa, M. Nakafuku, T. Satoh, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60, 349 (1991).
6. M. I. Simon, M. P. Strathmann, N. Gautam, Science 252, 802 (1991); Y. Kaziro, H. Itoh, T. Kozasa, M. Nakafuku, T. Satoh, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60, 349 (1991).
7. I. Zachary and E. Rozengurt, Cell 71, 891 (1992); T. Erpel and S. A. Courtneidge, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 176 (1995).
8. I. Zachary and E. Rozengurt, Cell 71, 891 (1992); T. Erpel and S. A. Courtneidge, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 176 (1995).
9. S. Nakanishi, Neuron 13, 1031 (1994).
10. I. Aramori and S. Nakanishi, ibid. 8, 757 (1992).
11. q/11.
12. q/11.
13. q/11.
14. T. J. O'Dell, E. R. Kandel, S. G. N. Grant, Nature 353, 558 (1991).
15. Y. T. Wang and M. W. Salter, ibid. 369, 233 (1994).
16. 2+-sensitive fluorescent dye fura 2-AM, as described (7). Inhibitors were applied 10 min before stimulation with glutamate. Ratio values varied among sets of experiments mainly because different objective lenses were used.
17. M. Masu, Y. Tanabe, K. Tsuchida, R. Shigemoto, S. Nakanishi, Nature 349, 760 (1991).
18. A. Gazit et al., J. Med. Chem. 34, 1896 (1991).
19. 3 was separated by Bio-Rad AG1X8 chromatography.
20. H. Umemori, unpublished data.
21. E. Meldrum, P. J. Parker, A. Carozzi, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1092, 49 (1991).
22. 3H]inositol 24 hours after transfection.
23. K. Fukuda et al., Nature 355, 355 (1988); L. M. F. Leeb-Lundberg and X.-H. Song, J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7746 (1991).
24. K. Fukuda et al., Nature 355, 355 (1988); L. M. F. Leeb-Lundberg and X.-H. Song, J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7746 (1991).
25. Wild-type Gα11 cDNA was isolated by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) after reverse transcription of RNA from mouse S49 lymphoma cells, and its sequence was confirmed by sequencing. Mutations in the Gα11 cDNA were introduced by PCR mutagenesis with wild-type cDNA as a template. The PCR primer pairs used were 5′-TAGCAAGCTTCATATGACTCTGGAGTCCATGAT-GGC-3′ and 5′CAATGGATCCACTTCCTGCGCTCT-GACCTCAGGGCCTCCC-3′ for the Q209L mutation [N.-X. Qian, S. Winitz, G. L. Johnson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 4077 (1993)] and 5′-ACCTTCTAGAA-GACAAGATC-3′ and 5′-CATGCCCGGGTCACAC-CAGGTTGAACTCCTTCAG-3′ for the Y356F mutation. The PCR fragments were inserted into the corresponding region of the wild-type Gα11 cDNA. Wildtype and mutated Gα11 cDNAs were subcloned into the Hind III site of pCMVS [S. Andersson, D. N. Davis, H. Dählbach, H. Jörnvall, D. M. Russell, J. Biol. Chem. 264, 8222 (1989)]. Mutations were confirmed by sequencing.
26. Wild-type Gα11 cDNA was isolated by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) after reverse transcription of RNA from mouse S49 lymphoma cells, and its sequence was confirmed by sequencing. Mutations in the Gα11 cDNA were introduced by PCR mutagenesis with wild-type cDNA as a template. The PCR primer pairs used were 5′-TAGCAAGCTTCATATGACTCTGGAGTCCATGAT-GGC-3′ and 5′CAATGGATCCACTTCCTGCGCTCT-GACCTCAGGGCCTCCC-3′ for the Q209L mutation [N.-X. Qian, S. Winitz, G. L. Johnson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 4077 (1993)] and 5′-ACCTTCTAGAA-GACAAGATC-3′ and 5′-CATGCCCGGGTCACAC-CAGGTTGAACTCCTTCAG-3′ for the Y356F mutation. The PCR fragments were inserted into the corresponding region of the wild-type Gα11 cDNA. Wildtype and mutated Gα11 cDNAs were subcloned into the Hind III site of pCMVS [S. Andersson, D. N. Davis, H. Dählbach, H. Jörnvall, D. M. Russell, J. Biol. Chem. 264, 8222 (1989)]. Mutations were confirmed by sequencing.
27. J. S. Moyers, M. E. Linder, J. D. Shannon, S. J. Parsons, Biochem. J. 305, 411 (1995).
28. F. Nakamura et al., J. Biol. Chem. 270, 6246 (1995).
29. H. R. Bourne, Nature 376, 727 (1995); T. van Biesen et al., ibid., p. 781.
30. H. R. Bourne, Nature 376, 727 (1995); T. van Biesen et al., ibid., p. 781.
31. The expression plasmid for active fyn [N. Fusaki et al., Int. Immunol. 6, 1245 (1994)] was used for transfection (8 μg per 10-cm dish).
32. K. Bluml, E. Mutschler, J. Wess, J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18870 (1994).
33. Y. Okuma and T. Reisine, ibid. 267, 14826 (1992).
34. 3H]QNB for 90 min at 30°C. In a typical experiment, total binding obtained from cell lysates was 2500 counts per minute.
35. G. Berstein et al., J. Biol. Chem. 267, 8081 (1992).
36. W. W. Liu, R. R. Mattingly, J. C. Garrison, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 8258 (1996).
37. K. Nakamura, T. Nukada, T. Haga, H. Sugiyama, J. Physiol. (London) 474, 35 (1994).
38. W. P. Hausdorff et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 5720 (1992).
39. 2+ imaging; L. G. Sayers and A. Tanaka for critical reading of the manuscript; K. Haga, T. Haga, and K. Kimura for discussions; and Y. Kaziro for his encouragement. Supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan (H.U. and T.Y.).