Routine addition of an automated biopsy device to fine-needle aspiration of the lung: A prospective assessment

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 169, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 661-666

  Boiselle, Phillip M ^a   Mark, Eugene J ^a   Szyfelbein, Wanda M ^b   Fan, Chieh Min ^a   Sianetz, Priscilla J ^a   Trotman Dickenson, Beatrice ^a   Halpernil, Elkan F ^a   McLoud, Theresa C ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEMOPTYSIS; HUMAN; LUNG BIOPSY; LUNG HEMORRHAGE; LUNG TUMOR; MALE; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030809511     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.169.3.9275873     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. We.stcott .IL. Direct percutaneous needle aspiration of localized pulmonary lesions: results in 422 patients. Radiology 1980:137:31-35
2. Perlmutt LM, Johnston WW, Dunnick NR. Percutaneous transthoracie ncedie aspiration: a review. AJR 1989:152:451-455
3. Wcstcott JL. Percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy. Radiology 1988:169:593-601
4. Khouri NF, Stitik FP, Erozan YS, et al. Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of benign and irsaiignant lung lesions. AJR 1985; 144:281-288
5. Stanley JH, Hsh CD, Andriole JG, et al. Lung lesions: cytologie diagnosis by tine-needle tiupsy. Radiology i987; 162:389-391
6. Poe RH, Tobin RE. Sensitivity and specificity of needle biopsy in lung malignancy. Amer Rev RespirDis 1980:122:725-729
7. Conces DJ, Schwenk R. Doering PR. Giant MD. Thoracic needle biopsy: improved results using a team approach. Chest 1987:91:813 8:6
8. Austin JHM, Cohen MB. Value of having a cy topathologist present during percutaneous fineneedle aspiration biopsy of lung: report of 55 cancer patients and metaanalysis of the literature. AJR 1993;160:175-177
9. Moulton JS. Moore PT. Coaxial percutaneous biopsy technique with automated biopsy devices: value in improving accuracy and negative predictive value. Radiology 1993; 186:515-522
10. Burbank F, Kayc K. SciviliC J. EKuan J, Bluinenfeld M. Image-guided automated core biopsies of the breast, chest, abdomen and pelvis. Radiology 1994:191:165-171
11. Haramati LB. CT-guided automated needle biopsy of the ches;. AJK 1995; 165:5.1-55
12. Klein JS, Salomon G. Stewan EA. Transthoracic needle biopsy with a coaxialiy placed 20-gauge automated cutting needle: results in 122 patients. Radiology 1996;198:715-720
13. Moore EH. Sheparci JO, McLoud TC. Templeton PA, Kosiuk JR Positional precautions in needle aspiration lung biopsy. Radiology 1990;175: 733-735
14. Gobien RP, Valicenti JF, Paris BS, Daniell C. fhin-needie aspiration biopsy: methods of increasing the accuracy of a negative prediction. Radiology 1982:145:603-605
15. Ilunsaker AR, Munden RF, Pugatch RD, Mentzer SJ. Sarcoid-iike reaction in patients with malignancy. Radiology 1996:200:255-261
16. Heilo A, Tumors of the mediastinum: US-guided histologie core-needle biopsy. Radiology 1993; 189:143-146