Coyote, Canis latrans, visitations to scent stations in southeastern Alberta

Canadian Field-Naturalist

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 200-203

  Woelfl, Sybille ^a,b   Woelfl, Manfred ^a,b  

^a ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^b NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abundance indices; Alberta; Attractant; Canis latrans; Coyote; Habitat; Scent stations

Indexed keywords

CANIS LATRANS;

EID: 0030807226     PISSN: 00083550     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barrett, R. H. 1982. Smoked aluminum track plots for determining furbearer distribution and relative abundance. California Fish and Game: 188-190.
2. Brady, J. R. 1981. Preliminary results of Bobcat scent station transects in Florida. Pages 101-103 in Proceedings of the Bobcat Research Conference 1979, Front Royal, Virginia.
3. Clark, T. W., and T. M. Campbell, III. 1983. A small carnivore technique. Great Basin Naturalist 43: 438-440.
4. Conner, M. C., R. F. Labisky, and D. R. Progulske. 1983. Scent-station indices as measures of population abundance for bobcats, raccoons, gray foxes, and opossums. Wildlife Society Bulletin 11: 146-152.
5. Diefenbach, D. R., M. J. Conroy, R. J. Warren, W. E. James, L. A. Baker. 1994. A test of the scent-station survey technique for bobcats. Journal of Wildlife Management 58: 10-17.
6. Hatcher, R. T., and J. H. Shaw. 1981. A comparison of three indices to furbearer populations. Wildlife Society Bulletin 9: 153-156.
7. Knowlton, F. F., and W. M. Tzilkowski. 1981. Trends in Bobcat visitations to scent-station survey lines in western United States, 1972-1978. Pages 8-12 in Bobcat Research Conference Proceedings: Current research on Biology and Management of Lynx rufus. National Wildlife Federation Science and Technology Series 6.
8. Lindzey, F. G., S. K. Thompson, and J. I. Hodges. 1977. Scent-station index of Black Bear abundance. Journal of Wildlife Management 41: 151-153.
9. Linhart, S. B., and F. F. Knowlton. 1975. Determining the relative abundance of Coyotes by scent-station lines. Wildlife Society Bulletin 3: 119-124.
10. Martin, D. J., and D. B. Fagre. 1988. Field evaluation of a synthetic Coyote attractant. Wildlife Society Bulletin 16: 390-396.
11. Roughton, R. D. 1982. A synthetical alternative to fermented egg as a canid attractant. Journal of Wildlife Management 46: 230-234.
12. Roughton, R. D., and M. W. Sweeney. 1982. Refinements in scent-station methodology for assessing trends in carnivore populations. Journal of Wildlife Management 46: 217-229.
13. Smith, W. P., D. L. Borden, and K. M. Enders. 1994. Scent-station visits as an index to abundance of raccoons: an experimental manipulation. Journal of Mammalogy 75: 637-647.
14. Stolzenburg, H. W., and V. W. Howard. 1989. Activation of liquid bait devices by Coyotes in southern New Mexico. Wildlife Society Bulletin 17: 306-312.
15. Sumner, P. W., and E. P. Hill. 1980. Scent-stations as indices of abundance in some furbearers of Alabama. Proceedings Annual Conference Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 34: 572-583.
16. Turkowski, F. J., M. L. Popelka, and R. W. Bullard. 1983. Efficacy of odor lures and baits for Coyotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 11: 136-145.
17. Usher, R. G., and W. L. Strong. 1994. Ecological land classification for the proposed Suffield National Wildlife Area. Environment Canada Conservation and Protection, 35 pages.
18. Wood, J. E. 1959. Relative estimates of fox population levels. Journal of Wildlife Management 23: 53-63.