Evaluation of skin sensitization and cross-reaction of nine alkyleneamines in the guinea pig maximization test

Journal of Toxicology - Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 189-195

  Leung, Hon Wing ^a   Auletta, Carol S ^b  

^a UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION   (United States)

^b Huntingdon Life Sciences New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINE;

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; GUINEA PIG; NONHUMAN; SKIN INJURY; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN SENSITIZATION; SKIN TOXICITY; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALIA; CAVIA PORCELLUS; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0030805852     PISSN: 07313829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/15569529709048895     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. T. T. Provost and O. F. Jillson, Ethylenediamine contact dermatitis, Arch. Dermatol. 96: 231, 1967.
2. E. Epstein and H. I. Maibach, Ethylenediamine allergic contact dermatitis, Arch. Dermatol. 98: 476, 1968.
3. M. I. White, Contact dermatitis from ethylenediamine, Contact Derm. 4: 291, 1978.
4. M. I. White, W. S. Douglas, and R. A. Main, Contact dermatitis attributed to ethylene diamine, Br. Med. J. 1: 415, 1978.
5. C. Babiuk, K. L. Hastings, and J. H. Dean, Induction of ethylenediamine hypersensitivity in the guinea pig and the development of ELISA and lymphocyte blastogenesis techniques for its characterization, Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 9: 623, 1987.
6. J. Maisey, R. Purchase, M. C. Robbins, and K. Miller, Evaluation of the sensitising potential of 4 polyamines present in technical triethylenetetramine using 2 animal species, Contact Derm. 18: 133, 1988.
7. S. F. McCullagh, Allergenicity of piperazine: A study of environmental aetiology, Br. J. Ind. Med. 25: 319, 1968.
8. C. D. Calnan, Occupational piperazine dermatitis, Contact Derm. 1: 126, 1975.
9. C. Savini, R. Morelli, and A. M. Peluso, Contact dermatitis due to piperazine in a plastic watch strap, Contact Derm. 22: 119, 1990.
10. E. Rudzki and D. Krajewska, Cross-reactions between ethylenediamine, diethylenetriamine and triethylenetetramine, Contact Derm. 2: 311, 1976.
11. S. Wright and R. R. M. Harman, Ethylenediamine and piperazine sensitivity, Br. Med. J. 287: 463-464, 1983.
12. M. L. Price and S. Hall-Smith, Allergy to piperazine in a patient sensitive to ethylenediamine, Contact Derm. 10: 120, 1984.
13. N. Balato, F. Cusano, G. Lembo, and F. Ayala, Ethylenediamine contact dermatitis, Contact Derm. 11: 112, 1984.
14. N. Balato, F. Cusano, G. Lembo, and F. Ayala, Ethylenediamine dermatitis, Contact Derm. 15: 263, 1986.
15. D. J. Paustenbach and H. W. Leung, Techniques for assessing the health risks of dermal contact with chemicals in the environment, In, Health Risk Assessment. Dermal and Inhalation Exposure and Absorption of Toxicants. R. G. Wang, J. B. Knaak, and H. I. Maibach, Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1993.
16. B. Magnusson and A. M. Kligman, The identification of contact allergens by animal assay: The guinea pig maximization test, J. Invest. Dermatol. 57: 268, 1969.
17. B. Magnusson, B. and A. M. Kligman, Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig: Identification of Contact Allergens, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1970.
18. T. R. Auton, P. A. Botham, and I. Kimber, Retrospective appraisal of the relationship between skin irritancy and contact sensitization potential, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 46: 149, 1995.