Comparison of service delivery models influencing teachers' use of assistive technology for students with severe disabilities

Occupational Therapy in Health Care

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 61-74

  Scott, Sherry B ^a  

^a HOWARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISABILITY; EDUCATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; TEACHING; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0030803471     PISSN: 07380577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J003v11n01_04     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. AOTA (1995). Concept paper: Service delivery in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(10), 1029-1031.
2. Bailey, D. M. (1994). Technology for adults with multiple impairments: A trilogy of case reports. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(4), 341-345.
3. Bain, B. K. (1995). Steps in a problem-solving evaluation for assistive technology. Technology Special Interest Section Newsletter, 5(2), 1-3.
4. Cook, A. M. (1991). Development of motor skills for switch use by persons with severe disabilities. Developmental Disabilities, 14(2), 3-4.
5. Coutinho, M. J. & Hunter, D. L. (1988). Special education and occupational therapy: Making the relationship work. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42(11), 706-712.
6. Cowan, J. (1994). Assistive technology and the functional approach in the educational setting. Technology Special Interest Section Newsletter, 4(4), 2.
7. Dunn, W. (1988). Models of occupational therapy service provision in the school system. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42(11), 718-723.
8. Dunn, W. (1990). A comparison of service provision models in school-base occupational therapy services: A pilot study. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10(5), 300-320.
9. Dunn, W. (1991). Pediatric occupational therapy: Facilitating effective service provision. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc.
10. Friend, M. & Cook, L. (1991). Interaction: Collaboration skills for school professionals. White Plains, NY: Longman.
11. Fulton, K. (1988). Perservice and inservice: What must be done in both. Electronic Learning, 8(2), 32-36.
12. Guide for teachers. (1989, June). Council for Exceptional Children. Reston, VA: Center for Special Education Technology.
13. Gutkin, T. B. & Hickman, J. A. (1988). Teachers' perceptions of control over presenting problems and resulting preferences for consultation versus referral services. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 395-398.
14. Hettinger, J. (1996). Assistive technology: A promising future. O.T. Week, 10(1), 14-16.
15. Howell, R. D. (1990). Technology and change in special education: An interactional perspective. Theory Into Practice, 29(4), 276-281.
16. Idol, L. & West, F. (1987). Consultation in special education (part II): Training and practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 474-494.
17. Izen, C. L. & Brown, F. (1991). Education and treatment needs of students with profound, multiply handicapping, and medically fragile conditions: A survey of teachers' perceptions. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 16(2), 94-103.
18. Jaffe, E. G. & Epstein, C. F. (1992). Occupational therapy consultation: Theory, principles and practice. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book Inc.
19. Parette, H. (1991). The importance of technology in the education and training of persons with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 21, 165-177.
20. Reshan, C. J. (1990). Consultation consideration: Making consultation work. Occupational Therapy Forum, 5(11), 1-5.
21. Students with severe and profound disabilities. (1990, December). Council for Exceptional Children. Reston, VA: Center for Special Education Technology.
22. The role of the occupational and physical therapist in assistive technology. (1991, March). Council for Exceptional Children. Reston, VA: Center for Special Education Technology.
23. Tapper, B. E. (1995). Spreading the word. O.T. Week, 9 (24), 24.
24. Technology-related assistance for individuals with disabilities act of 1988 (Public Law 100-407), 29 U.S.C. 2201.