Facile and performant enantiomeric excess analysis of diene iron tricarbonyl complexes through deuterium NMR

Tetrahedron Asymmetry

Volumn 8, Issue 14, 1997, Pages 2447-2451

  Canet, Jean Louis ^a   Canet, Isabelle ^b   Gelas, Jacques ^a   Ripoche, Isabelle ^a   Troin, Yves ^a  

^a Ecl Natl Sup Chim Clermont F   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL DERIVATIVE; ALDEHYDE; ALKADIENE; DICHLOROMETHANE; IRON; IRON COMPLEX; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND; POLYPEPTIDE; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEUTERON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; DIASTEREOISOMER; ENANTIOMER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REDUCTION; STEREOISOMERISM; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0030796225     PISSN: 09574166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0957-4166(97)00267-X     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. For reviews, see: a) Grée R. Synthesis 1989, 341-355.
2. b) Kappes D.; Gerlach H.; Zbinden P.; Dobler M. Helv. Chim. Acta 1990, 73, 1515-1520.
3. c) Pearson A.J. Iron Compounds in Organic Synthesis, Academic Press: London 1994; Chapter 4 and 5.
4. d) Iwata C.; Takemoto Y. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1996, 2497-2504.
5. Ripoche I.; Gelas J.; Grée D.; Grée R.; Troin Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6675-6678.
6. Ripoche I.; Bennis K.; Canet J.-L.; Gelas J.; Troin Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 3991-3992.
7. Knölker H.J.; Gonser P.; Koegler T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2405-2408, and references cited therein.
8. Parker D. Chem. Rev. 1991, 97, 1441, and references cited therein.
9. a) Canet I.; Meddour A.; Courtieu J.; Canet J.-L.; Salaün J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2155-2156.
10. b) Meddour A.; Canet I.; Loewenstein A.; Péchiné J.-M.; Courtieu J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9652-9656.
11. c) Canet I.; Courtieu J.; Loewenstein A.; Meddour A.; Péchiné J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6520-6526.
12. d) Canet J.-L.; Canet I.; Courtieu J.; Da Silva S.; Gelas J.; Troin Y. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 9035-9037.
13. Howell J.A.S.; O'Leary P.J.; Palin M.G.; Jaouen G.; Top S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 307-315.
14. Clinton N.A.; Lyllia C.P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 3058-3064.
15. 3 moiety, the diastereoselectivity of the reduction depends on the conformer population of the aldehyde group. As outlined in reference 1a, aldehydes give usually poor diastereoselectivities and the relative stereochemistry of the resulting products is difficult to establish unambiguously.
16. Nakanishi S.; Kumeta K.; Nakanishi J.I.; Takata T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 2097-2100.
17. Franck-Neumann M.; Colson P.J. Synlett 1991, 891-894.
18. It has to be noted that, in our experimental conditions (5 mm tubes in 10 mm probe, no lock during acquisition), external peaks are usually broader than internal ones. Anyway, we could verify that this phenomenon does not affect the integration ratios; in the case of (+)-2d and (+)-2e, longer acquisition times (5-6 times) have increased this broadening. Better resolution should be obtained using a selective 5 mm deuterium probe (see ref 6).
19. 3); for determination of absolute configurations, see Djedaini F.; Grée D.; Martelli J.; Grée R.; Leroy L.; Bolard J.; Toupet L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 3781-3784.