Detection of malingering on the Halstead-Reitan Battery: A cross- validation

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 585-589

  McKinzey, R K ^a,c   Russell, Elbert W ^b  

^a Center for Psychological Studies California   (United States)

^b Kolitz and Russell   (United States)

^c 3045 Telegraph   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; HEAD INJURY; HUMAN; MALINGERING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING;

EID: 0030795121     PISSN: 08876177     EISSN: 18735843     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0887-6177(97)00005-X     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Faust, D., Hart, K. J., & Guilmette, T. J. (1988). Pediatric malingering: The capacity of children to fake believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 578-582.
2. Faust, D., Hart, K. J., Guilmette, T. J., & Arkes, H. R. (1988). Neuropsychologists' capacity to detect adolescent malingerers. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 19, 508-515.
3. Faust, D., Ziskin, J., & Hiers, J. (1991). Brain damage claims: Coping with neuropsychological evidence. Los Angeles, CA: Law and Psychology Press.
4. Heaton, R. K., Smith, H. H., Lehman, R. A., & Vogt, A. T. (1978). Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsvchological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 892-900.
5. McKinzey, R. K., Podd, M. H., Krehbiel, M. A., Mensch, A. J., & Trombka, C. C. (in press). Detection of malingering on the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: An initial and cross-validation. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology.
6. Mittenberg, W., Rotholc, A., Russell, E., & Heilbronner, R. (1996). Identification of malingered head trauma on the Halstead-Reitan Battery. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 271-281.
7. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
8. Rogers, R. (1988). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York: The Guilford Press.
9. Rogers, R., Harrell, E. H., & Liff, C. D. (1993). Feigning neuropsychological impairment: A critical review of methodological and clinical considerations. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 255-274.
10. Russell, E. (1984). Theory and development of pattern analysis methods related to the Halstead-Reitan Battery. In P. E. Logue & J. M. Schear (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 50-98). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
11. Russell, E. (1995). The accuracy of automated and clinical detection of brain damage and lateralization in neuropsychology. Neuropsychology Review, 5, 1-68.
12. Russell, E., Neuringer, C., & Goldstein, G. (1970). Assessment of brain damage: A neuropsychological approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
13. Russell, E. W., & Starkey, R. (1993). Halstead Russell Neuropsychological Evaluation System (HRNES). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
14. Ziskin, J. (1995). Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Law and Psychology Press.