Test-retest reliability of the alcohol and drug use disorder sections of the schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry (SCAN)

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 187-194

  Easton, Caroline ^a   Meza, Eduardo ^a   Mager, Doug ^b   Ulüg, Berna ^c   Kilic, Cengiz ^c   Göǧüş, Ahmet ^c   Babor, Thomas F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^b Medical Faculty Asociates   (United States)

^c HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Disorder; Drug; SCAN

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; ILLICIT DRUG;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; CULTURAL FACTOR; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DRUG DEPENDENCE; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NEUROPSYCHIATRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; CONNECTICUT; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STREET DRUGS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TURKEY;

ANKARA;

EID: 0030793891     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-8716(97)00089-6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Psychiatric Association, 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association.
2. American Psychiatric Association, 1987. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed., revised. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric, Association.
3. Beck, A., Ward, C., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., Erbaugh, J., 1962. Reliability of psychiatric diagnoses: 2. A study of consistency of clinical judgements and ratings. Am. J. Psychiatr. 119, 351-357.
4. Chatterji, S., Saunders, J., Vrasti, R., Grant B., Hasin D., Mager D., 1997. Reliability of the alcohol and drug modules of the WHO alcohol use disorders and associated disabilities interview schedule - alcohol/drug revised (AUDADIS-ADR) in India, Romania and Australia. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 47, 171-185 (this issue).
5. Chou, S.P., Grant, B.F., Dawson, D.A., Towle, L.H., 1994. Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Diagnosis and Classification of Drug Abuse and Dependence: Results of the WHO/NIH CAR Project-SARS Substudy. Rockville, MD, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
6. Dawson, D.A., Grant, B.F., Towle, L.H., 1994. A Cross Cultural Comparison of the Diagnosis and Classification of Alcohol Abuse and Dependence: Results of the WHO/NIH CAR Project-SARS Substudy. Geneva Switzerland, World Health Organization.
7. Fleiss, J.L., 1991. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Wiley, New York.
8. Grant, B. (In press). DSM-IV, DSM-III-R, and ICD-10 alcohol and drug abuse/harmful use and dependence, United States, 1992: a nosological comparison. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res.
9. Hasin, D., Trautman, K., Miele, G., Samet, S., Smith, M., Endicott, J., 1996. Psychiatric research interview for substance and mental disorders (PRISM): reliability in substance abusers. Am. J. Psychiatr. 153, 1195-1201.
10. Hasin, D., McCloud, S., Li, Q., Endicott, J. (In press) Cross-system agreement among demographic subgroups: DSM-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and ICD-10 diagnoses of alcohol use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence
11. Hasin D., Grant B., Cottler L., Blaine J., Towle L., Ustun T., Sartorius N., 1997. Nosological comparisons of alcohol and drug diagnoses: a multisite, multi-instrument international study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 47, 217-226 (this issue).
12. Room, R., Janca, A., Bennett, L.A., Schmidt, L., Sartorius, N., 1996. WHO cross cultural applicability research on diagnosis and assessment on substance use disorders: an overview of methods and selected results. Addiction 91, 199-220.
13. Semler, G., Wittchen, H.J., Joschke, K., Aaudig, M., von Geiso, T., Kaiser, S., vonCranach, M., Pfister, H.J., 1987. Test-retest reliabilty of a standardized psychiatric interview (DIS/CIDI). Euro Arch. Psychiatr. Neurolog. Sci. 236, 214-222.
14. Spitzer, R.L., Endicott, J., Robins, E., 1978. Research diagnostic criteria rationale and reliability. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 35, 773-782.
15. Shouten, H.J.A., 1980. Measuring pairwise agreement among many observers. Biometry 6, 497-504.
16. Wing, J., Babor, T., Brugha, T., Burke, J., Cooper, J., Giel, R., Jablenski, A., Regier, D., Sartorius, N., 1990. SCAN schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 47, 589-593.
17. Wittchen, H.U., Semler, G., von Zerssen, D., 1985. A comparison of two diagnostic methods. Clinical ICD diagnoses vs. DSM-III and research diagnostic criteria using the diagnostic interview schedule (version 2). Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 42, 677-684.
18. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental et al., 1992. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1992.
19. Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. American Psychiatric Association, 1992World Health Organization. Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc., 1992.