High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging to characterize the geometry of fatigued porcine bioprosthetic heart valves

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 424-432

  Smith, D B ^a   Sacks, Michael S ^a,d   Pattany, P M ^b   Schroeder, R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c St Jude Medical Inc USA   (United States)

^d University of Miami College of Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; IMPLANTATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE;

ANIMALS; BIOPROSTHESIS; EVALUATION STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SWINE;

EID: 0030793763     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Gallo I, Ruiz B, Nistal F. Degeneration in primary bioprosthetic cardiac valves: Incidence of primary tissue failures among 938 bioprostheses at risk. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:1061-1065
2. Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mazzucco A. Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;90:564-569
3. Milano A, Bortolotti U, Talenti E. Calcific degeneration as the main cause of porcine bioprostheses. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:1066-1070
4. Ferrans VJ, Hilbert SL, Fujita S, Jones M, Roberts WC. Morphologic abnormalities in explanted bioprosthetic heart valves. In: Virmani R, Atkinson JB, Fenoglio JJ (ed). Cardiovascular Pathology. Vol. 23. (Major Problems in Pathology). W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1991:373-398
5. Hilbert SL, Ferrans VJ, Swanson WM. Optical methods for the nondestructive evaluation of collagen morphology in bioprosthetic heart valves. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:1411-1421
6. Schoen FD, Hobson CE. Anatomic analysis of removed prosthetic heart valves: Causes of failure of 33 mechanical valves and 58 bioprostheses, 1980-1983. Hum Pathol 1985;16:545-549
7. Thubrikar M (ed). The Aortic Valve. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1990
8. Schoen F, Levy R. Pathology of substitute heart valves. J Card Surg 1994;9:222-227
9. Sacks MS, Smith DB. Structural damage of porcine bioprosthetic heart valves subjected to longterm accelerated testing. Adv Bioeng, ASME, 1996
10. Sacks MS, Smith DB, Schroeder R. Fatigue of bioprosthetic heart valve leaflets. Transactions of the 5th World Congress of Biomaterials, 1996
11. Sacks MS, Billiar KL. Biaxial mechanical properties of bioprosthetic heart valve cusps subjected to accelerated testing. In: Gabbay S, Frater RWM (ed). Advances in Anti-Calcific and Anti-Degenerative Treatment of Heart Valve Bioprostheses (in press)
12. Flugge W. Stresses in Shells. 2nd edn., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1973
13. Davilia JC. Prosthetic Valves for Cardiac Surgery. Thomas, Springfield, 1961
14. Cross FD, Jones RC, Gerein AN. Prosthetic Valves for Cardiac Surgery. Thomas, Springfield, 1961
15. Swanson WM, Clark RE. Dimension and geometric relationships of the human valve and function of pressure. Circ Res 1974;35:871-882
16. Black MM, Howard IC, Huang XC, Patterson EA. A Three-dimensional analysis of a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Biomech 1991;24:793-801
17. Gould PL, Cataloglu A, Chattopadyhay A, Dhatt G, Clark RE. Stress analysis of the human aortic valve. Computers & Structures 1973;3:377
18. Vesely I. Analysis of the Medtronic Intact bioprosthetic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;101:90-99
19. Paiva M, Verbanck S, Estenne M, Poncelet B, Segebarth C, Macklem PT. Mechanical implications of in vivo human diaphragm shape. J Appl Phys 1992;72:1407-1412
20. Bowen BC, DePrima S, Pattany PM, Marcillo A, Madsen P, Quencer RM. MR angiography of normal intradural vessels of the thoracolumbar spine. Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:483
21. Bowen BC, Fraser K, Kochan JP, Pattany PM, Green BA, Quencer RM. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: Evaluation with MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:2029
22. Sacks MS, Chuong CJ, Templeton GH, Peshock R. In vivo 3-D reconstruction and geometric characterization of the right ventricular free wall. Ann Biomed Eng 1993;21:263-275
23. Ateshian GA, Rosenwasser MP, Mow VC. Curvature characteristics and congruence of the thumb carpometacarpal joint: Differences between female and male joints. J Biomech 1992;6:591-607
24. Ishihara T, Ferrans VJ, Boyce SW, Jones M, Roberts WC. Structure and classification of cuspal tears and perforations in porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves implanted in patients. Am J Cardiol 1981;48:665-678
25. Broom ND, Marra D. Effect of glutaraldehyde fixation and valve constraint conditions on porcine aortic valve leaflet coaptation. Thorax 1982;37:620-626
26. Flynn PJ, Jain AK. On reliable curvature estimation. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1989;110-116
27. Kunzelman KS, Cochran RP, Chuong CJ, Ring WS, Verrier ED, Eberhart RD. Finite element analysis of the mitral valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1993;2:326-340
28. Cataloglu A, Gould PL, Clark RE. Refined stress analysis of human aortic heart valves. J Eng Mech 1975;102(1):135-150
29. Geiger AW, Zarubin A, Fahrenkamp A, Hertel M, von Bally G, Scheld HH. Non-destructive evaluation of prosthetic heart valves by holographic interferometry. J Heart Valve Dis 1993;2:343-347
30. Geiger AW, Zarubin AM, Fahrenkamp A, Konertz W, von Bally G, Scheld HH. Non-destructive evaluation techniques for prosthetic heart valves based on hologram interferometry. Part II: Experimental results and clinical implications. J Heart Valve Dis 1993;2:448-453
31. Broom ND. The stress-strain and fatigue behavior of glutaraldehyde preserved heart-valve tissue. J Biomech 1977;10:707-724
32. Song T, Vesely I, Boughner D. Effects of dynamic fixation on shear behavior of porcine xenograft valves. Biomaterials 1990;11:191-196