Phylogeny of Chuquiraga sect. Acanthophyllae (Asteraceae-Barnadesioideae), and the evolution of its leaf morphology in relation to climate

Systematic Botany

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 151-163

  Ezcurra, Cecilia ^a   Ruggiero, Adriana ^a   Crisci, Jorge Victor ^b  

^a LABORATORIO ECOTONO   (Argentina)

^b Museo de la Mujer   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASTERACEAE; BARNADESIOIDEAE; CHUQUIRAGA; PUNA;

EID: 0030791224     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2419683     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. BERTILLER, M. B., A. M. BEESKOW, and F. CORONATO. 1991. Seasonal environmental variation and plant phenology in arid Patagonia. Journal of Arid Environments 21:1-11.
2. BOCHER, T. W. 1979. Xeromorphic leaf types, evolutionary strategies and tentative semophyletic sequences. Biologiske Skrifter 22:1-77.
3. BOHM, B. A. and T. E STUESSY. 1995. Flavonoid chemistry of Barnadesioideae (Asteraceae). Systematic Botany 20: 22-27.
4. BREMER, K. 1992. Ancestral areas: a cladistic reinterpretation of the center of origin concept. Systematic Biology 41: 436-445.
5. _ and R. K. JANSEN. 1992. A new subfamily of the Asteraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 414-415.
6. BROOKS, D. R. and D. A. MCLENNAN. 1991. Phylogeny, ecology and behaviour: a research program in comparative biology. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
7. BROWN, J. H. and A. C. GIBSON. 1983. Biogeography. St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Company.
8. BRUNDIN, L. Z. 1966. Transatlantic relationships and their significance as evidenced by chironomid midges. Konigla Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 11:1-472.
9. _. 1981. Croizat's panbiogeography versus phylogenetic biogeography. Pp. 94-158 in Vicariance biogeography - a critique, eds. G. Nelson and D. E. Rosen. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
10. _. 1988. Phylogenetic biogeography. Pp. 343-369 in Analytical biogeography, eds. A. A. Myers and P. S. Giller. London: Chapman and Hall.
11. CABRERA, A. L. and A. WILLINK. 1980. Biogeografía de América Latina. O.E.A. Serie de Biología, Monografía 13. Washington, D.C.: General Secretariat of the Organization of American States.
12. CRONQUIST, A. 1988. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Bronx, New York: The New York Botanical Garden.
13. DEVORE, M. L. and T. F. STUESSY. 1995. The place and time of origin of the Asteraceae, with additional comments on the Calyceraceae and Goodeniaceae. Pp. 23-40 in Advances in Compositae systematic, eds. D. J. N. Hind, C. Jeffrey and G. V. Pope. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
14. ENGHOFF, H. 1993. Phylogenetic biogeography of a Holarctic group: the julidan millipedes. Cladistic subordinatedness as an indicator of dispersal. Journal of Biogeography 20: 525-536.
15. ESPINOSA, R. 1933. Ökologischen Studien über Kordillerenpflanzen. Botanische Jahrbucher 65: 120-212.
16. EZCURRA, C. 1985. Revisión del género Chuquiraga (Compositae-Mutisieae). Darwiniana 26: 219-284.
17. _ and J. V. CRISCI. 1987. Relaciones de similitud entre las especies del género Chuquiraga (CompositaeMutisieae): un análisis numérico. Darwiniana 28: 219-229.
18. FARRIS, J. S. 1988: Hennig86 user's manual. Port Jefferson Station, New York: Publ. by the author.
19. _. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
20. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985a. Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist 125: 1-15.
21. _. 1985b. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
22. FERREYRA, R. 1995. Family Asteraceae: Part VI. Pp. 1-101 in Flora of Peru, eds. J. Francis Macbride and Collaborators. Fieldiana, Botany (n.s.) 35.
23. FRANKLIN, W. L. 1982. Biology, ecology and the relationships to man of the South American camelids. Pp. 457-489 in Mammalian biology in South America, eds. M. A. Mares and H. H. Genoways. Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology, Univ. of Pittsburgh, Special Publication 6: 457-489.
24. GARLAND, T. JR., P. H. HARVEY, and A. R. IVES. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology 41: 18-32.
25. HARLING, G. 1991. Compositae-Mutisieae. Pp. 1-105 in Flora of Ecuador, Vol. 42, eds. G. Harling and L. Anderson. Stockholm: Swedish Natural Science Research Council.
26. HARVEY, P. H. and M. D. PAGEL. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
27. HENNIG, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics, Urbana: Univ. of Illinois.
28. HOFFMAN, J. A. J. 1975. Atlas climático de América del Sur. Mapas de temperatura y precipitaciones medias. Geneve: WMO, UNESCO.
29. KLEINBAUM, D. G. and L. L. KUPPER. 1978. Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Massachusetts: Duxubury Press.
30. LUCKOW, M. and H. C. F. HOPKINS. 1995. A cladistic analysis of Parkia (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). American Journal of Botany 82: 1300-1320.
31. MADDISON, W. P., M. J. DONOGHUE, and D. R. MADDISON. 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Systematic Zoology 33: 63-104.
32. MARKGRAF, V. 1986. Paleoclimas del último glacial y postglacial en los Andes de Argentina. Acta Geocriogénica 4: 93-110.
33. _. 1989. Paleoclimates in Central and South America since 18,000 BP based on pollen and lake-level records. Quaternary Science Reviews 8: 1-24.
34. PARKHURST, D. F. and O, L. LOUCKS. 1972. Optimal leaf size in relation to environment. Journal of Ecology 60: 505-537.
35. PARRISH, J. T. 1987. Global paleogeography and paleoclimate of the Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary. Pp. 51-73 in The origin of the Angiosperms and their biological consequences, eds. E. M. Friis and W. G. Chaloner. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
36. PASCUAL, R. 1984. Late Tertiary mammals of southern South America as indicators of climatic deterioration. Pp. 1-30 in Quaternary of South America and the Antarctic peninsula, ed. J. Rabassa. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.
37. _ and E. ORTIZ JAUREGUIZAR. 1990. Evolving climates and mammal faunas in Cenozoic South America. Journal of Human Evolution 19: 23-60.
38. PLATNICK, N. I. 1981. The progression rule or progress beyond rules in biogeography. Pp. 144-150 in Vicariance biogeography - a critique, eds. G. Nelson and D. E. Rosen. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
39. PURVIS, A. and A. RAMBAUT. 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. CABIOS 11: 247-251.
40. _, J. L. GITTLEMAN and H. K. LUH. 1994. Truth or consequences: effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. Journal of Theoretical Biology 167: 293-300.
41. RAVEN, P. H. and D. I. AXELROD. 1974. Angiosperm biogeography and past continental movements. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 61: 539-673.
42. REDMANN, R. E. 1985. Adaptation of grasses to water stress - leaf rolling and stomate distribution. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 72: 833-842.
43. ROBINSON, H. 1987. Some suggestions regarding the significance of chloroplast DNA variation in the Asteraceae. Phytologia 63: 316-324.
44. SAGÁSTEGUI ALVA, A. and I. SÁNCHEZ VEGA. 1991. Una nueva especie de Chuquiraga del norte de Peru. Arnaldoa 1: 1-4.
45. SIMPSON, B. B. 1975. Pleistocene changes in the flora of the high tropical Andes. Paleobiology 1: 273-294.
46. _ and J. L. NEFF. 1985. Plants, their pollinating bees, and the Great American Interchange. Pp. 427-452 in The great American biotic interchange, eds. F. D. Stehli and S. D. Webb. New York: Plenum Publ. Corporation.
47. _ and C. C. TODZIA. 1990. Patterns and processes in the development of the High Andean flora. American Journal of Botany 77: 1419-1432.
48. SOLBRIG, O. T. 1976. The origin and floristic affinities of the South American temperate desert and semidesert regions. Pp. 7-49 in Evolution of desert biota, ed. D. S. Goodall, Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
49. STEBBINS, G. L. 1981. Coevolution of grasses and herbivores. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68: 75-86.
50. STUESSY, T. F., T. SANG, and M. L. DEVORE. 1996. Phylogeny and biogeography of the subfamily Barnedesioideae with implications for early evolution of the Compositae. Pp. 463-490 in Compositae: systematics. Proceedings of the international Compositae conference, Kew, 1994, vol. 1, eds. D. J. N. Hind and H. J. Beenrje. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
51. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1991. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 3.0. Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.
52. TAYLOR, D. W. 1991. Paleogeographic relationships of Andean angiosperms of Cretaceous to Pliocene age. Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology 88: 69-84.
53. TURNER, B. L. 1977. Fossil history and geography. Pp. 21-35 in Biology and chemistry of the Compositae, Vol. 1, eds. V. H. Heywood, J. B. Harborne and B. L. Turner. New York: Academic Press.
54. VILLAGRÁN, C., M. T. KALIN ARROYO, and C. MARTICORENA. 1983. Efectos de la desertización en la distribución de la flora andina de Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 56: 137-157.
55. WEBB, D. S. 1978. A history of savanna vertebrates in the New World, Part II: South America and the Great Interchange. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9: 393-426.
56. WHEELER, J. C. 1995. Evolution and present situation of the South American Camelidae. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 54: 271-295.
57. WULFF, A. F. 1990. Estudios cromosómicos en Barnadesiinae (Mutisiaeae, Asteraceae), I, Chuquiraga y Doniophyton. Darwiniana 30: 185-193.
58. ZDERO, C., F. BOHLMANN, and R. M. KING. 1987. Chemistry of the Barnadesioideae (Asteraceae). Phytologia 63: 313-315.