Tutorial: An introduction to syntax

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 254-272

  Shapiro, Lewis P ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Language; Linguistics; Syntax

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY;

EID: 0030789352     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4002.254     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abney, S. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
2. Barrs, A., & Lasnik, H. (1986). A note on anaphora and double objects. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 347-354.
3. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
4. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of a theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.
6. Chomsky, N. (1992). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 1. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
7. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Fillmore, C. J. (1988). The mechanisms of "construction grammar." Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkeley.
9. Frazier, L. (1978). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
10. Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1995). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Friedmann, N., & Grodzinsky, Y. (in press). Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language.
12. Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G. K., & Sag, I. (1985). Generalized phrase structure grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
14. Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Grodzinsky, Y. (1990). Theoretical perspectives on language deficits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). Trace deletion, theta-roles, and cognitive strategies. Brain and Language, 51, 469-497.
17. Haegeman, L. (1992). Introduction to Government and Binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Hagiwara, H. (1995). The breakdown of functional categories and the economy of derivation. Brain and Language, 50, 92-116.
19. Hickok, G., Zurif, E. B., & Canseco-Gonzales, E. (1993). Structural description of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 45, 371-395.
20. Hyams, N. (1996). The underspecification of functional categories in early grammar. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 91-127). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
21. Jackendoff, R. (1990a). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Jackendoff, R. (1990b). On Larson's treatment of the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 427-455.
23. Kaplan, R., & Bresnan, J. (1982). Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Larson, R. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335-392.
25. Lebeaux, D. (1988). Language acquisition and the form of grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
26. Leonard, L. B. (1995). Functional categories in the grammars of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1270-1283.
27. Leonard, L. B., & Loeb, D. F. (1988). Government-binding theory and some of its applications: A tutorial. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 31, 515-524.
28. Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
30. Marantz, A. (1995). The minimalist program. In G. Webelhuth (Ed.), Government and binding theory and the minimalist program. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
31. Mauner, G., Fromkin, V., & Cornell, T. (1993). Comprehension and acceptability in agrammatism: Disruption in the syntax of referential dependency. Brain and Language, 45, 340-370.
32. Nicol, J. (1988). Coreference processing during sentence comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
33. Perlmutter, D., & Rosen. C. (Eds.). (1984). Studies in relational grammar 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Pollock, J. Y. (1989). Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365-424.
35. Radford, A. (1988). Transformational syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Rice, M., Wexler, K., & Cleave, P. (1995). Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 850-863.
37. Riemsdijk, H. van, & Williams, E. (1986). Introduction to the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Rubin, S. S., Newhoff, M., Peach, R. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (1996). Electrophysiological indices of lexical processing: The effects of verb complexity and age. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1071-1080.
39. Sells, P. (1985). Lectures on contemporary syntactic theories. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
40. Shapiro, L. P., Brookins, B., Gordon, B., & Nagel, H. N. (1991). Verb effects during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 983-996.
41. Shapiro, L. P., Gordon, B., Hack, N., & Killackey, J. (1993). Verb-argument structure processing in complex sentences in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 423-447.
42. Shapiro, L. P., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1987). Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs. Cognition, 27, 219-246.
43. Shapiro, L. P., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1989). Verb representation and sentence processing: Contextual impenetrability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 223-243.
44. Sportiche, D. (1988). A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 425-449.
45. Swinney, D., Ford, M., & Bresnan, J. (1989). On the temporal course of gap-filling and antecedent assignment during sentence comprehension. In B. Grosz, R. Kaplan, M. Macken, & I. Sag (Eds.), Language structure and processing. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
46. Swinney, D., & Osterhout, L. (1991). Inference generation during language comprehension. In A. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Inference and text comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
47. Swinney, D., & Zurif, E. B. (1995). Syntactic processing in aphasia. Brain and Language, 50, 225-239.
48. Thompson, C. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (1994). A linguistic-specific approach to treatment of sentence production deficits in aphasia. Clinical Aphasiology, 22, 307-323.
49. Thompson, C. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (1995). Training sentence production in agrammatism: Implications for normal and disordered language. Brain and Language, 50, 201-224.
50. Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L. P., Ballard, K. J., Jacobs, B. J., Schneider, S. S., & Tait, M. E. (1997). Training and generalized production of wh-and NP-movement structures in agrammatic aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 228-244.
51. Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285-318.
52. Zurif, E. B., Swinney, D., Prather, P., Solomon, J., & Bushell, C. (1993). An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 448-464.