Criticisms and concerns regarding DNA profiling

Forensic Science International

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 23-31

  Lincoln, Patrick J ^a  

^a St Bartholomew's Roy London S   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Court presentation; DNA profiling; Guidelines; Reliability; Single locus probes

Indexed keywords

DNA; DNA FRAGMENT;

CONFERENCE PAPER; COURT; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA PROBE; FORENSIC SCIENCE; GENE LOCUS; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLING; TANDEM REPEAT; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0030786470     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00080-7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. R. v Nathaniel, Cr. App. R. 2 (1995) 565.
2. R. v Gordon, Cr. App. R. 1 (1995) 290; Crim. LR (1995) 413.
3. R. v Gordon, Cr. App. R. 1 (1995) 290; Crim. LR (1995) 413.
4. R. v Dean, The Times 10 January (1994); Crim. LR (1995) 413.
5. R. v Dean, The Times 10 January (1994); Crim. LR (1995) 413.
6. R. v Borham, Unreported, 3 November (1992).
7. R. v Doheny, The Times, 14 August (1996).
8. R. v Adams, The Times (1996).