메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 21, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 250-256

Consulting about priorities for the NHMRC national breast cancer centre: How good is the nominal group technique

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CONSULTATION; FAMILY; FEMALE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONITORING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

EID: 0030784685     PISSN: 13260200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.1997.tb01695.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (29)

References (9)
  • 3
    • 85036680308 scopus 로고
    • Sydney: Clinical Oncological Society of Australia
    • Australia's First National Breast Cancer Consensus Conference. Consensus report. Sydney: Clinical Oncological Society of Australia, 1994.
    • (1994) Consensus Report
  • 8
    • 0028999787 scopus 로고
    • Setting targets: A three stage model for determining priorities for health promotion
    • Brown W, Redman S. Setting targets: a three stage model for determining priorities for health promotion. Aust J Public Health 1995; 19: 263-9.
    • (1995) Aust J Public Health , vol.19 , pp. 263-269
    • Brown, W.1    Redman, S.2
  • 9
    • 85036675698 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sydney: NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre
    • Consultative report. Sydney: NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre, 1996
    • (1996) Consultative Report


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.