Issues of validity and reliability concerning who scores the post- encounter patient-progress note

Academic Medicine

Volumn 72, Issue 10 SUPPL. 1, 1997, Pages

  Ben David, Miriam Friedman ^a   Boulet, Jack R ^b   Burdick, William P ^b   Ziv, Amitai ^b   Hambleton, Ronald K ^b   Gary, Nancy E ^b  

^a ECFMG   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; MEDICAL RECORD; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TRAINING;

EID: 0030784640     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199710001-00027     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Sutnick AI, Stillman PL, Norcini JJ, et al. Pilot study of the use of the ECFMG clinical competence assessment to provide profiles of clinical competencies of graduates of foreign medical schools for residency directors. Acad Med. 1994;69:65-7.
2. Stillman PL, Regan MB, Haley HA, Norcini JJ, Friedman M, Sutnick AI. The use of a patient note to evaluate clinical skills of first-year residents who are graduates of foreign medical schools. Acad Med. 1992;67(10 suppl):S57-S59.
3. Sutnick AI, Friedman M, Stillman PL, Norcini JJ, Wilson MP. International use of standardized patients. Teach Learn Med. 1994;6:33-5.
4. Sutnick AI, Stillman PL, Norcini JJ, et al. ECFMG assessment of clinical competence of graduates of foreign medical schools. JAMA. 1993;270:1041-5.
5. Van der Vleuten CPM, Norman GR, De Graaff E. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of reliability. Med Educ. 1991;25:110-8.
6. Norman GR, Van der Vleuten CPM, De Graaff E. Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability. Med Educ. 1991;25:119-26.