Cost-effectiveness considerations in pediatric cochlear implantation

American Journal of Otology

Volumn 18, Issue 6 SUPPL., 1997, Pages

  Summerfield, A Q ^a,c   Marshall, D H ^a   Archbold, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c MRC INSTITUTE OF HEARING RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cochlear implantation

Indexed keywords

CHILD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEAFNESS; HUMANS;

EID: 0030778498     PISSN: 01929763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Carroll G. (1993). Priority setting in purchasing health care. In: Smith R, ed. Rationing in action. London: BMJ, 1993:125-38.
2. Wyatt JR, Niparko JK, Rothman M, et al. Cost effectiveness of the multi-channel cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1995;16:52-62.
3. Summerfield AQ, Marshall DH. Cochlear implantation in the UK 1990-1994. London: HMSO Books, 1995.
4. Patrick DL, Erickson P. Health status and health policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
5. Kind P, Gudex C. The role of QALYs in assessing priorities between health-care interventions. In: Drummond MF, Maynard A, eds. Purchasing and providing cost-effective health care. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone, 1993:94-108.
6. Hutton J, Politi C. Cost-effectiveness of cochlear implantation of children: European study. London: Battelle Medical Technology and Policy Research Centre, 1995.