Effect of floricane number in 'Marion' trailing blackberry. I. Primocane growth and cold hardiness

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 122, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 604-610

  Cortell, Jessica M ^a   Strik, Bernadine C ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Absolute growth rate; Biennial; Branching; Growth analysis; Pruning; Source sink; Training

Indexed keywords

ARUNDINARIA; RUBUS;

EID: 0030776673     PISSN: 00031062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.122.5.604     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bell, N., E. Nelson, B. Strik, and L. Martin. 1992. Assessment of winter injury to berry crops in Oregon, 1991. Oregon State Univ. Agr. Expt. Sta. Spec. Rpt. 902.
2. Bell, N., B. Strik, and L.W. Martin. 1995a. Effect of primocane suppression date on 'Marion' trailing blackberry. I. Yield components. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 120:21-24.
3. Bell, N.C., B.C. Strik, and L.W. Martin. 1995b. Effect of primocane suppression date on 'Marion' trailing blackberry. II. Cold hardiness. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 120:25-27.
4. 50 of cold stressed flower buds. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 99:187-190.
5. Braun, J.W., J.K.L. Garth, and C.A. Brun. 1989. Distribution of foliage and fruit in association with light microclimate in the red raspberry canopy. J. Hort. Sci. 64:565-572.
6. Cameron, J.S., S.F. Klauer, and C. Chen. 1993. Developmental and environmental influences on the photosynthetic biology of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) Acta Hort. 352:113-121.
7. Clark, R.J. 1984. Biennial cropping, an alternative production system for red raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.). Sci. Hort. 24:315-321.
8. Conroy, B. 1967. The caneberry market situation-today, 1968, and the future. Proc. Ore. Hort. Soc. 59:105-109.
9. Cortell, J.M. and B.C. Strik. 1997. Effect of floricane number in 'Marion' trailing blackberry. II. Yield components and dry weight partitioning. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 122:611-615.
10. Crandall, P.C., D.F. Allmendinger, J.D. Chamberlain, and K.A. Biderbost. 1974. Influence of cane number and diameter, irrigation, and carbohydrate reserves on the fruit number of red raspberries. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 99:524-526.
11. Crandall, P.C., J.D. Chamberlain, and J.K.L. Garth. 1980. The effects of primocane suppression on growth, yield, and chemical composition of red raspberries. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 99:524-526.
12. Fernandez, G.E. and M.P. Pritts. 1993. Growth and source-sink relationships in 'Titan' red raspberry. Acta Hort. 352:151-157.
13. Fernandez, G.E. and M.P. Pritts. 1994. Growth, carbon acquisition and source-sink relationships in 'Titan' red raspberry. Acta Hort. 325:151-157.
14. Fernandez, G.E. and M.P. Pritts. 1996. Carbon supply reduction has a minimal influence on current year's red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) fruit production. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121:473-477.
15. Gundersheim, N.A. and M.P. Pritts. 1991. Pruning practices affect yield, yield components, and their distribution in 'Royalty' purple raspberry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116:390-395.
16. Hunt, R. 1982. Plant growth curves. Univ. Park Press, Baltimore, Md. p. 126-128.
17. Klauer, S.F., C. Chen, and J.S. Cameron. 1992. Diurnal photosynthesis and starch deposition in leaves of fruiting and deflowered red raspberry canes. HortScience 27:654.
18. Lawson, H.M. and J.S. Wiseman. 1983. Techniques for the control of cane vigor in red raspberry in Scotland: Effects of timing and frequency of cane removal treatments on growth and yield in cv. Glen Cova. J. Hort. Sci. 58:247-260.
19. Moore, J.N. and R.M. Skirvin. 1990. Blackberry management, p. 214-244. In: G.J. Galletta and D.G. Himelrick (eds.). Small fruit crop management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
20. Nehrbas, S.R. and M.P. Pritts. 1988. Effect of pruning system on yield components of two summer-bearing raspberry cultivars. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Soc. 113:314-321.
21. Nelson, E. and L.W. Martin. 1989. Comparison of four training systems in alternate-year (AY) and every-year (EY). Proc. Ore. Hort. Soc. 80:174-176.
22. Privé, J.P., J.A. Sullivan, J.T.A. Proctor, and O.B. Allen. 1993. Climate influences vegetative and reproductive components of primocane-fruiting red raspberry cultivars. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 118:393-399.
23. Sheets, W.A. 1987. Alternate-year (AY) training is for real. Ore. Hort. Soc. 78:179-182.
24. Sheets, W.A. and K.F. Kangas. 1970. Progress report on A-Y production of caneberries. Proc. Ore. Hort. Soc. 61:91-92.
25. Sheets, W.A., R.M. Bullock, and R. Garren. 1972. Effects of plant density, training, and pruning on blackberry yield. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 97:262-264.
26. Strik, B.C. 1992. Blackberry cultivars and production trends in the Pacific Northwest. Fruit Var. J. 46:202-206.
27. Vasilakakis, M.D. and M.N. Dana. 1978. Influence of primocane inflorescence removal on number of inflorescences and suckers in 'Heritage' red raspberry. HortScience 13:700-701.
28. Waister, P.D., M.R. Cormack, and W.A. Sheets. 1977. Competition between fruiting and vegetative phases in the red raspberry. J. Hort. Sci. 52:75-85.
29. Waister, P.D. and C. Wright. 1989. Dry matter partitioning in cane fruits, p. 51-61. In: C.J. Wright (ed.). Manipulation of fruiting. Butterworths, Boston.
30. Whitney, G.C. 1982. The productivity and carbohydrate economy of a developing stand of Rubus idaeus. Can. J. Bot. 60:2697-2703.
31. Williamson, B., H.M. Lawson, J.A.T. Woodford, A.J. Hargreaves, J.S. Wiseman, and S.C. Gordon. 1979. Vigour control, an integrated approach to cane, pest, and disease management in red raspberry (Rubus idaeus). Ann. Appl. Biol. 92:359-368.
32. Wright, C.J. and P.D. Waister. 1982a. Within-plant competition in red raspberry. I. Primocane growth. J. Hort. Sci. 57:437-442.
33. Wright, C.J. and P.D. Waister. 1982b. Within-plant competition in red raspberry. II. Fruiting cane growth. J. Hort. Sci. 57:443-448.