Anatomic variation of structural properties of periacetabular bone as a function of age: A quantitative computed tomography study

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 1997, Pages 804-811

  Hauser, Diana L ^a,b,d   Fox, Julia C ^a   Sukin, Dean ^c   Mudge, Beatrice ^a   Coutts, Richard D ^c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acetabulum; Age factors; Bone density; Finite element analysis; Morphology; Structure

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE AGE; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENSITOMETRY; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; SCHOOL CHILD; SURGICAL ANATOMY;

EID: 0030774830     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90012-7     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Fabeck L, Descamps P, Bourgois R, Dhem A: Contribution to the study of pelvic stress during weight-bearing: role of the pubic branch and trabecular bone. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 80:181, 1994
2. Carter DR, Vasu R, Harris WH: Stress distributions in the acetabular region: II. Effects of cement thickness and metal backing of the hip acetabular component. J Biomech 3:165,1982
3. Goel V, Valliappan S, Svensson N: Stresses in the normal pelvis. Comput Biol Med 2:91,1978
4. Koeneman J, Hansen T, Beres K: Three dimensional finite element analysis of the hip joint. Presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Las Vegas, NV, February 1989
5. Landerjerit B, Jacquard-Simon N, Thourot M, Massin P: Physiological loadings on human pelvis: a comparison between numerical and experimental simulations. Presented at the 8th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Biomechanics, Rome, Italy, June 1992
6. Oonishi H, Isha H, Hasegawa T: Mechanical analysis of the human pelvis and its application to the artificial hip joint-by means of the three dimensional finite element method. J Biomech 16:427, 1983
7. Vasu R, Carter DR, Harris WH: Stress distributions in the acetabular region: I. Before and after total joint replacement. J Biomech 3:155, 1982
8. Rapperport D, Carter D, Schurman D: Contact finite element stress analysis of the hip joint. J Orthop Res 4:435, 1985
9. Levenston ME, Beaupre GS, Schurman DJ, Carter DR: Computer simulations of stress-related bone remodeling around noncemented acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 8:595, 1993
10. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ et al: Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech 11-12:1135, 1987
11. Dalstra M, Huiskes R: Load transfer across the pelvic bone. J Biomech 6:715, 1995
12. Schuller H, Dalstra M, Huiskes R, Marti R: Total hip reconstruction in acetabular dysplasia: a finite element study. J Bone Joint Surg 75:468, 1993
13. Dalstra M, Huiskes R, Odgaards A, van Erning L: Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. J Biomech 4-5:523, 1993
14. Snyder S, Schneider E: Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Orthop Res 3:422, 1991
15. Marom S, Linden M: Computer aided stress analysis of long bones utilizing computed tomography. J Biomech 5:399, 1990
16. Rho J, Hobatho M, Ashman R: Relationships between axial modulus, ultimate strength, density, and CT numbers for human cortical and cancellous bone. Presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Washington, D.C., February 1992
17. Esses S, Lotz J, Hayes W: Biomechanical properties of the proximal femur determined in vitro by single-energy quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 5:715, 1989
18. Keyak J, Meagher J, Skinner H, Mote CJ: Automated three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone: a new method. J. Biomed Eng 5:389, 1990
19. Cheal E, Grierson A, Hsu H et al: Comparable bone remodeling around composite and titanium alloy femoral stems in dogs as determined by QCT. Presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Washington, D.C., February 1992
20. Edidin A, Taylor D: Use of variable stiffness elements is equivalent to global mesh refinement in a bone-alone proximal femoral finite element model. Presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Washington, D.C., February 1992
21. Keyak J, Fourkas M, Meagher J, Skinner H: Strain gauge verification of an automated method of finite element modeling for bone from CT scan data. Presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Washington, D.C., February 1992
22. McCarthy M: Bone geometry from CAT scans for finite element analysis: image processing considerations and modeling effects. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1989
23. Carter DH, Hayes WC: The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg 59A:954, 1977
24. D'Antonio J: Periprosthetic bone loss of the acetabulum: classification and management. Orthop Clin North Am 23:279, 1992
25. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM: Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a six-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1:33, 1994
26. Perona PG, Lawrence JM, Paprosky WG: An acetabular classification system and applied surgical techniques in revision total hip arthroplasty surgery: a six-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Presented at the meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, San Francisco, February, 1993
27. Martin R, Atkinson P: Age and sex-related changes in the structure and strength of the human femoral shaft. J Biomech 4:223, 1977
28. Lotz J, Gerhart T, Hayes W: Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 14:107, 1990
29. Miller F, Moseley C, Koreska J: Pelvic anatomy relative to lumbosacral instrumentation. J Spinal Disord 2:169, 1990
30. Brinckmann P, Hoefert H, Jongen H: Sex differences in the skeletal geometry of the human pelvis and hip joint. J Biomech 6:427, 1981
31. Taque R: Variation in pelvic size between males and females. J Phys Anthropol 1:59, 1989
32. Sponseller P, Bisson L, Gearhart J et al: The anatomy of the pelvis in the exstrophy complex. J Bone Joint Surg 72A:177, 1995
33. Mankovich N, Robertson D, Essinger J: Measuring the accuracy of CT bone geometry for orthopedic implants. Comput Assist Radiol 1991
34. Esses S, Lotz J, Hayes W: Biomechanical properties of the proximal femur determined in vitro by single-energy quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 4:715, 1989
35. Hauser D: MODEL. Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of Radiology, C, Silicon Graphics Workstation, 1996
36. Hauser D, Wayner P, Taylor D: Improving the accuracy of region of interest integrals. Med Phys 22:723, 1995
37. Bullough P, Goodfellow J, Greenwald A, O'Connor J: Incongruent surfaces in the human hip joint. Nature 135:1290, 1968
38. Kim Y: Relationship between sphericity of femoral head-acetabulum and the low incidence of primary osteoarthritis of the hip joint in Koreans. Yonse Med J 30:280, 1989
39. Snyder W, Cook M, Nasset E et al: Report of the task group on reference man. Perga mon, Oxford, 1975
40. Sutherland C, Gayou D: Artifacts and thresholding in x-ray CT of a cortical bone and titanium composite. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:496, 1996
41. Sumner D, Olson C, Freeman P, Lobick J: Computed tomographic measurement of cortical bone geometry. J Biomech 6-7:649, 1989