The normal retrograde cholangiogram: A definition of normal caliber

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 509-512

  Low, V H S ^a,b  

^a SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Bile ducts; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; COMMON BILE DUCT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS;

AGING; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; COMMON BILE DUCT; FEMALE; HEPATIC DUCT, COMMON; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 0030768370     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002619900250     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Gulliver DJ, Cotton PB, Baillie J. Anatomic variants and artifacts in ERCP interpretation. Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:975-980
2. Rizzo RJ, Szucs RA, Turner MA. Congenital abnormalities of the pancreas and biliary tree in adults. Radiographics 1995;15:49-68
3. Turner MA, Cho SR, Messmer JM. Pitfalls in cholangiographic interpretation. Radiographics 1987;7:1067-1105
4. Fink AS, Perez de Ayala V, Chapman M, Cotton PB. Radiologic pitfalls in endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. Pancreas 1986; 1:180-187
5. Zeman RK, Burrell MI, Dobbins J, Jaffe MH, Choyke PL. Post-cholecystectomy syndrome: evaluation using biliary scintigraphy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1985;156:787-792
6. Hamilton I, Ruddell WSJ, Mitchell CJ, Lintott DJ, Axon ATR. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiograms of the normal and post-cholecystectomy biliary tree. Br J Surg 1982;69:343-345
7. Cooperberg PL, Li D, Wong P, Cohen MM, Burhenne HJ. Accuracy of common hepatic duct size in the evaluation of extrahepatic biliary obstruction. Radiology 1980;135:141-144
8. O'Connor HJ, Bartlett RJ, Hamilton I, Ellis WR, Watters JK, Lintott DJ, Axon ATR. Bile duct calibre: the discrepancy between ultrasonic and retrograde cholangiographic measurements in the post-cholecystectomy patient. Clin Radiol 1985;36:507-510
9. Burrell MI, Zeman RK, Simeone JF, Daachman AH, McGahan JP, vanSonnenberg E, Zimmon DS, Torres W, Laufer I. The biliary tract: imaging for the 1990s. Amer J Roentgenol 1991; 157:223-233
10. Chung SCS, Leung JWC, Li AKC. Bile duct size after cholecystectomy: an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic study. Br J Surg 1990;77:534-535
11. Reinus WR, Shady K, Lind M, Scott R. Ultrasound evaluation of the common duct in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:489-492
12. Niederau C, Sonnenberg A, Mueller J. Comparison of the extrahepatic bile duct size measured by ultrasound and by different radiographic methods. Gastroenetrology 1984;87:615-621
13. Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT, Simeone JF, VanSonnenberg E, Hall DA, Wittenberg J. Observations on the distensibility of the common bile duct. Radiology 1982;142:467-472
14. Sauerbrei EE, Cooperberg PL, Gordon P, Li D, Cohen MM, Burhenne HJ. The discrepancy between radiographic and sonographic bile-duct measurements. Radiology 1980;137:751-755
15. Chang VH, Cunningham JJ, Fromkes JJ. Sonographic measurement of the extrahepatic bile duct before and after retrograde cholangiography. Am J Roentgenol 1985;144:753-755