Left hemisphere advantage for classical conditioning to auditory verbal CSs: Effects of nonattended extinction

Psychophysiology

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 566-571

  Saban, Sara ^b   Hugdahl, Kenneth ^a   Stormark, Kjell Morten ^b   Hammerborg, Dag ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Attention; Brain laterality; Conditioning; Dichotic listening; Hemispheric asymmetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONDITIONING; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REINFORCEMENT; VERBALIZATION; VOWEL;

EID: 0030766207     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb01743.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andreassi, J. L., Desimone, J. J., Friend, M. A., & Grota, P. A. (1975). Hemispheric amplitude asymmetries in the auditory evoked potential with monaural and binaural stimulation. Physiological Psychology, 7, 169-171.
2. Bryden, M. P. (1988). Dichotic studies of the lateralization of affect in normal subjects. In K. Hugdahl (Ed.). Handhook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods, and research (pp. 1-44). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
3. Bryden, M. P., & Bulman-Fleming, B. (1993). Concurrent left-hemisphere verbal and right-hemisphere emotional processing in a dichotic task. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology, 15, 35.
4. Connolly, J. F. (1985). Stability of pathway-hemispheric differences in the auditory event related potential (ERP) to monaural stimulation. Psychophysiology, 22, 87-96.
5. Corteen, R. S., & Wood, B. (1972). Autonomie response to shock-associated words in an unattended channel. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 308-313.
6. Davidson, R. J. (1995). Cerebral asymmetry, emotion, and affective style. In R. J. Davidson & K. Hugdahl (Eds.), Brain asymmetry (pp. 361-389). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Dawson, M. E., & Furedy, J. J. (1976). The role of awareness in human differential autonomic classical conditioning: The necessary-gate hypothesis. Psychophysiology, 13, 50-53.
8. Dawson, M. E., & Schell, A. M. (1982). Electrodermal responses to attended and nonattended significant stimuli during dichotic listening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 82-86.
9. Esteves, F., Parra, C., Dimberg, U., & Öhman, A. (1994). Non-attended associative learning: Pavlovian conditioning of skin conductance responses to masked fear-relevant facial stimuli. Psychophysiology, 31, 375-385.
10. Fowles, D. C., Christie, M. J., Edelberg, R., Grings, W. W., Lykken, D. T. & Venables, P. H. (1981). Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology, 18, 232-239.
11. Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual maksing: A survey and appraisal. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 1-66.
12. Hugdahl, K. (1987). Pavlovian conditioning and hemispheric asymmetry: A perspective. In G. Davey (Ed.), Cognitive processes and Pavlovian conditioning in humans (pp. 147-177). Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
13. Hugdahl, K. (1995a). Dichotic listening: Probing temporal lobe functional integrity. In R. J. Davidson & K. Hugdahl (Eds.). Brian asymmetry (pp. 123-156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Hugdahl, K. (1995b). Psychophysiology: The mind-body perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Hugdahl, K., & Brobeck, C. G. (1986). Hemispheric asymmetry and human electrodermal conditioning: The dichotic extinction paradigm. Psychophysiology, 23, 491-499.
16. Hugdahl, K., & Nordby, H. (1991). Hemisphere differences in conditional learning: An ERP study. Cortex. 27, 557-570.
17. Hugdahl, K., Saban, S., Johnsen, B. H., & Brobeck, C. G. (1994). Hemispheric asymmetry and human associative learning: Interactions with attention. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 29, 25-38.
18. Kimura, D. (1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3, 163-178.
19. Kirk, R. A. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole.
20. Lazarus, R. S., & McCleary, R. (1951). Autonomie discrimination without awareness: A study of subception. Psychological Review, 58, 113-122.
21. Lykken, D. T. (1968). Neuropsychology and psychophysiology in personality research. In E. F. Borgatta & W. W. Lambert (Eds.). Handbook of personality theory and research: Part 2. Chicago: Rand McNally.
22. Martin, D. G., Stambrook, M., Tataryn, D. J., & Biehl, H. (1984). Conditioning in the unattended left ear. International Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 95-102.
23. Maximilian, V. A. (1982). Cortical blood flow asymmetry during monaural verbal stimulation. Brain and Language, 15, 1-11.
24. Öhman, A., Esteves, F., & Soares, J. J. F. (1995). Preparedness and preattentive associative learning: Electrodermal conditioning to masked stimuli. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 99-108.
25. Raczkowski, D., Kalat, J. W., & Nebes, R. D. (1974). Reliability and validity of some handedness questionnaire items. Neuropsychologia, 12, 43-47.
26. Wardlaw, K. A., & Kroll, N. E. (1976). Autonomic responses to shock-associated words in a non-attended message: A failure to replicate. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 357-360.
27. Wexler, B. E., & Halwes, T. G. (1983). Increasing the power of dichotic methods, the fused rhymed words test. Neuropsychologia, 21, 59-66.
28. Wright, J. M. von, Andersson, K., & Stenman, U. (1975). Generalization of conditioned GSRs in dichotic listening. In P. M. Rabbit & S. Domic (Eds.), Attention and Performance (Vol. 5). London: Academic Press.