Confrontation visual field tests

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 17, Issue SUPPL. 2, 1997, Pages

  Elliott, David B ^a   North, Ian ^a   Flanagan, John ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EXAMINATION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; METHODOLOGY; OPTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SCREENING; SCREENING TEST; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 0030765120     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0275-5408(97)00045-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson, D. A. (1987). Perimetry, with and without automation. The C. V. Mosby company, St Louis.
2. Berry, H. (1963). Examination of the central portion of the visual fields at the bedside. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 47, 436-440.
3. Blum, F. G., Gates, L. K., James, B. R. (1959) Cited in: Wellings, P. C. (1989). Detection and recognition of visual field defects resulting from lesions involving the visual pathways. Aust. and NZ J. Ophthalmol. 17, 331-335.
4. Chawla, H. B. (1993). Ophthalmology. Second edition. Churchill Livingstone, London.
5. Drasdo, N. and Peaston, W. C. (1980). Sampling systems for visual field assessment and computerised perimetry. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 64, 705-712.
6. Frisen, L. (1973). A versatile colour confrontation test for the central visual field. Arch. Ophthalmol. 89, 3-9.
7. Frisen, L. (1990). Clinical tests of vision. Raven Press, New York.
8. Glaser, J. S. and Goodwin, J. A. (1990). Neuro-ophthalmologic examination: the visual sensory system. In Duane's Clinical Ophthalmology, eds. W. Tasman and E. A. Jaeger, Vol. 2, pp. 13-19. Lippincot-Raven, Philadelphia.
9. Gohel, R. C. and Galanis, J. C. (1990). Comparison of automated screening and threshold visual field tests in detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 31, 192.
10. Heijl, A. (1995). Improved algorithms for automated perimetry. In Glaucoma Update, ed. G. K. Kriegelstein, Vol. 5, pp. 168-173. Kaden Verlag.
11. Harrington, D. (1976). The visual fields: a textbook and atlas of clinical perimetry. Mosby, St Louis.
12. Henson, D. B. (1993). Visual Fields. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford.
13. Johnson, L. N. and Baloh, F. G. (1991). The accuracy of confrontation visual field test in comparison with automated perimetry. J. Nat. Med. Assoc. 83, 895-898.
14. LeBlanc, R. P., Lee, A. and Baxter, M. (1985). Peripheral nasal field defects. In Proceedings of the 6th International Visual Field Symposium, eds. A. Heijl and E. L. Greve, pp. 377-381. Dr W Junk, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
15. McClure, E. (1988). Visual fields. In Optometry, eds K. Edwards and R. Llewellyn. Butterworths, London.
16. Mandahl, A. (1994). Red Square test for visual field screening. Acta Ophthalmol. 72, 683-687.
17. Mutlukan, E. and Cullen, J. F. (1991). Red colour comparison perimetry chart in neuro ophthalmological examination. Eye 5, 352-361.
18. Ogawa, T., Suzuki, R. (1974). Cited in: Wellings, P. C. (1989). Detection and recognition of visual field defects resulting from lesions involving the visual pathways. Aust. & NZ J. Ophthalmol. 17, 331-335.
19. Shahinfar, S., Johnson, L. N. and Madsen, R. W. (1995). Confrontation visual field loss as a function of decibel sensitivity loss on automated static perimetry. Ophthalmology 102, 872-877.
20. Stewart, W. C. and Shields, M. B. (1991). The peripheral visual field in glaucoma: Re-evaluation in the age of automated perimetry. Surv. Ophthalmol. 36, 59-69.
21. Trobe, J. D., Acosta, P. C. and Krischer, J. P. (1981a). A screening method for chiasmal visual field defects. Arch. Ophthalmol. 99, 264-271.
22. Trobe, J. D., Acosta, P. C., Krischer, J. P. and Trick, G. L. (1981b). Confrontation visual field techniques in the detection of anterior visual pathway lesions. Ann. Neurol. 10, 28-34.
23. Wellings, P. C. (1989). Detection and recognition of visual field defects resulting from lesions involving the visual pathways. Aust. & NZ J. Ophthalmol. 17, 331-335.
24. Wild, J. M. (1997). SITA - A new outlook for visual field examination in primary and shared care. Optician 5592 (213), 35-37.
25. Wirtshafter, J. D., Hard-Boberg, A., Coffman, S. M. (1984) Cited in: Wellings, P. C. (1989). Detection and recognition of visual field defects resulting from lesions involving the visual pathways. Aust. & NZ J. Ophthalmol. 17, 331-335.