Choice of a tone-pip envelope for frequency-specific threshold evaluations by means of the middle-latency response: Normally hearing subjects and slope of sensorineural hearing loss

Auris Nasus Larynx

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 333-340

  Xu, Zheng Min ^a   De Vel, Eddy ^a   Vinck, Bart ^a   Van Cauwenberge, Paul B ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Low and middle frequencies; Middle latency response threshold; Na Pa amplitude; Pa latency; Slope of sensorineural hearing loss; Stimulus envelope time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; WAVEFORM;

ADULT; AGED; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN STEM; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 0030764104     PISSN: 03858146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0385-8146(97)10014-1     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Davis H. Frequency selectivity and thresholds of brief stimuli suitable for electric response audiometry. Audiology. 23:1984;59-74.
2. Kodera K., Robert F.H., Yamada O., Suzuki J.I. Effects of rise time on simultaneously recorded auditory evoked potentials from the early, middle and late ranges. Audiology. 18:1979;395-402.
3. Maurizi M., Ottavian F. Middle-latency auditory components in responses to clicks in neonates. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 83:1984;695-702.
4. Beattie R.C., Moretti M., Warren V. Effects of rise-fall time, frequency, and intensity on the early/middle evoked response. J Speech Hear Disord. 49:1984;114-127.
5. McGee T., Kraus N. Toward a strategy for analyzing the auditory middle-latency responses waveform. Audiology. 27:1988;119-130.
6. Musiek F.E., Geurkink N.A. Auditory brainstem and middle latency evoked response sensitivity near threshold. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 90:1981;236-240.
7. Scherg M., Volk S.A. Frequency specificity of simultaneously recorded early and middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 56:1983;236-240.
8. Kavanagh K.T., Harker L.A., Tyler R.S. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. II. Threshold response to a 500 Hz tone pip. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 108:1984;1-12.
9. Hecox K., Deegan F. Rise-fall time effects on the brainstem auditory evoked response: mechanisms. J Acoust Soc Am. 73:1983;2109-2116.
10. Burkard R. Sound pressure level measurement and spectral analysis of brief acoustic transients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 57:1984;83-91.
11. Gorga M.P., Abbas P.J., Worthington D.W. Stimulus calibration in ABR measurements. Audiology. 23:1985;569-580.
12. Hausler R., Maginn C., Mulette P. Low frequency hearing threshold determination in newborns, infants and mentally retarded children by middle latency responses. Acta Oto-Laryngol (Stockh). 482:1991;58-71.
13. Van der Drift J.F.C., Brocaar M.P., Van Zanten G.A. The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss. Audiology. 26:1987;1-10.
14. Jerger J., Mauldin L. Prediction of sensorineural hearing loss from the brainstem evoked response. Arch Otolaryngol. 104:1978;456-461.
15. Kraus N., McGee T. Clinical implications of primary and non-primary components of the middle latency response. Ear Hear. 14:1993;36-48.