Direct comparison of pollen-mediated movement of native and engineered genes

Euphytica

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 397-403

  Hokanson, Stan C ^a,b   Hancock, James F ^a   Grumet, Rebecca ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Cucumis melo; Gene movement; Gene silencing; Pollen flow; Risk assessment; Transgenic plants

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030760416     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1003061501477     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andow, D.A., 1994. Community response to transgenic plant release: Using mathematical theory to predict effects of transgenic plants. Molec Ecol 3: 65-70.
2. Beck, E., G. Ludwig, E.A. Auerswald, B. Reiss & H. Schaller, 1982. Nucleotide sequence and exact localization of the neomycin phosphotransferase gene from transposon Tn5. Gene 19: 327-336.
3. Bergelson, J., 1994. Changes in fecundity do not predict invasiveness: A model study of transgenic plants. Ecology 75: 249-252.
4. Brandle, J.E., S.G. McHugh, L. James, H. Labbe & B.L. Miki, 1995. Instability of transgene expression in field grown tobacco carrying the csr-1 gene for sulfonylurea herbicide resistance. BioTechnology 13: 994-998.
5. Colwell, R.K., E.A. Norse, D. Pimentel, F.E. Sharples & D. Simberloff, 1985. Genetic engineering in agriculture. Science 229: 111-112.
6. Crawley, M.J., 1987. What makes a community invasible? In: A.J. Gray, M.J. Crawley & P.J. Edwards (Eds.), Colonization, Succession and Stability, pp. 429-453. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
7. Crawley, M.J., 1990. The ecology of genetically engineered organisms: Assessing the environmental risks. In: H.A. Mooney & G. Bernardi (Eds.), Introduction of Genetically Modified Organisms into the Environment, pp. 429-453. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
8. Crawley, M.J., R.S. Hails, M. Rees, D. Kohn & J. Buxton, 1993. Ecology of transgenic oilseed rape in natural habitats. Nature 362: 620-623.
9. Dale, P.J., 1992. Spread of engineered genes to wild relatives. Plant Physiol 100: 13-15.
10. Darmency, H., 1994. The impact of hybrids between genetically modified crop plants and their related species: introgression and weediness. Molec Ecol 3: 37-40.
11. Dellaporta, S.L., J. Wood & J.B. Hicks, 1985. Maize DNA miniprep. In: R. Malmberg, J. Messing & I. Sussex (Eds.), Molecular Biology of Plants, pp. 36-37. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY.
12. Ellstrand, N.C., 1988. Pollen as a vehicle for the escape of engineered genes? In: J. Hodgson & A.M. Sugden (Eds.), Planned Release of Genetically Engineered Organisms. Trends in Biotechnology/Trends in Ecology and Evolution Special Publication, pp. s30-s32. Elsevier Publications, Cambridge, UK.
13. Ellstrand, N.C. & C.A. Hoffman, 1990. Hybridization as an avenue of escape for engineered genes. BioScience 40: 438-442.
14. Fang, G. & R. Grumet, 1993. Genetic engineering of potyvirus resistance using constructs derived from the zucchini yellow mosaic virus coat protein gene. Molec Plant-Microbe Interact 6 (3): 358-367.
15. Finnegan, J. & D. McElroy, 1994. Transgene inactivation: Plants fight back! Bio/Technology 12: 883-888.
16. Gliddon, C., 1994. The impact of hybrids between genetically modified crop plants and their related species: biological models and theoretical perspectives. Molec Ecol 3: 41-44.
17. Goy, P.A. & J.H. Duesing, 1996. Assessing the environmental impact of gene transfer to wild relatives. Bio/Technology 14: 39-40.
18. Hancock, J.F., S.C. Hokanson & R. Grumet, 1996. The opportunity for escape of engineered genes from transgenic crops. HortScience 31: 1080-1085.
19. Hokanson, S.C., R. Grumet & J.F. Hancock, 1997. Effect of border rows and trap/donor ratios on pollen-mediated gene movement. Ecological Applications (in press).
20. Kareiva, P., W.F. Morris & C.M. Jacobi, 1994. Studying and managing the risk of cross-fertilization between transgenic crops and wild relatives. Molec Ecol 3: 15-21.
21. Linider, C.R. & J. Schmitt, 1994. Assessing the risks of transgene escape through time and crop-wild hybrid persistence. Molec Ecol 3: 23-30.
22. Linder, C.R. & J. Schmitt, 1995. Potential persistence of escaped transgenes: performance of transgenic, oil-modified Brassica seeds and seedlings. Ecol Applic 5: 1056-1068.
23. Manasse, R.S., 1992. Ecological risks of transgenic plants: effects of spatial dispersion on gene flow. Ecol Applic 2: 431-438.
24. Manasse, R. & P. Kareiva, 1991. Quantifying the spread of recombinant genes and organisms. In: L. Ginzburg (Ed.), Assessing Ecological Risks of Biotechnology, pp. 215-231. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA.
25. Matzke, M. & A.J.M. Matzke, 1993. Genomic imprinting in plants: parental effects and trans-inactivation phenomena. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Molec Biol 44: 53-76.
26. McPartlan, H.C. & P.J. Dale, 1994. An assessment of gene transfer by pollen from field-grown transgenic potatoes to non-transgenic potatoes and related species. Transgenic Res 3: 216-225.
27. Meyer, P., F. Lian, I. Heidmann, H. Meyer, I. Hiedenhof & H. Saedler, 1991. Endogenous and environmental factors influence 35S promoter methylation of maize A1 gene construct in transgenic petunia and its color phenotype. Molec Gen Genet 231: 345-352.
28. Mikkelsen, T.R., B. Anderson & R.B. Jorgenson, 1996. The risk of transgene spread. Nature 380: 31.
29. Mooney, H.A. & J.A. Drake, 1990. The release of genetically designed organisms in the environment: lessons from the study of the ecology of biological invasions. In: H.A. Mooney & G. Bernardi (Eds.), Introduction of Genetically Modified Organisms into the Environment; Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment, pp. 117-127. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
30. Morris, W.F., P.M. Kareiva & P.L. Raymer, 1994. Do barren zones and pollen traps reduce gene escape from transgenic crops? Ecol Applic 4: 159-165.
31. Motes, J.E., 1977. Pickling cucumbers, production harvesting. Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E-837.
32. Nugent, P.E., 1987. C879-J1 and -J2 virescent mutant muskmelon breeding lines. HortScience 22: 333-335.
33. Purrington, C.B. & J. Bergelson, 1995. Assessing weediness of transgenic crops: Industry plays plant ecologist. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 340-342.
34. Raybould, A.F. & A.J. Gray, 1994. Will hybrids of genetically modified crops invade natural communities? Trends Ecol Evol 9: 85-89.
35. Rissler, J. & M. Mellon, 1993. Perils amidst the promise: ecological risks of transgenic crops in a global market? Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA.
36. Rissler, J. & M. Mellon, 1995. What's coming to market? Gene Exchange 6: 8-9.
37. Scheffler, J.A. R. Parkinson & P.J. Dale, 1993. Frequency and distance of pollen dispersal from transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Transgenic Res 2: 356-364.
38. Timmons, A.M., Y.M. Charters, J.W. Crawford, D. Burn, S.E. Scott, S.J. Dubbels, N.J. Wilson, A. Robertson, E.T. O'Brien, G.R. Squire & M.J. Wilkinson, 1996. Risks from transgenic crops. Nature 380: 487.
39. Walter, C., I. Broer, D. Hilleman & A. Puhler, 1992. High frequency, heat treatment-induced inactivation of the phosphinothricin resistance gene in transgenic single cell suspension cultures. Molec Gen Genet 235: 189-196.
40. Williamson, M., 1994. Community response to transgenic plant release: predictions from British experience of invasive plants and feral crop plants. Molec Ecol 3: 75-79.