Determinants for contraceptive use in young, single, Danish women from the general population

Contraception

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 287-294

  Svare, Edith Ingerslev ^c   Kjaer, Susanne Krüger ^b   Poll, Paul ^c   Bock, Johannes E ^a  

^a International Center for Research and Research Training in Endocrine Disruption of Male Reproduction and Child Health   (Denmark)

^b INSTITUTE OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Denmark)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Condom; Contraception; Determinants for contraceptive use; Double contraception; Multiple logistic regression analysis; Oral Contraception; Single women

Indexed keywords

ESTROGEN; GESTAGEN; ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; SPERMICIDAL AGENT;

ABORTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONDOM; CONTRACEPTION; DENMARK; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE;

ACCEPTOR CHARACTERISTICS; ACCEPTORS; ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME--PREVENTION AND CONTROL; BARRIER METHODS; BEHAVIOR; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONDOM; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS; CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS CHOSEN--DETERMINANTS; CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE; CORRELATION STUDIES; DENMARK; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DISEASES; EUROPE; FAMILY PLANNING; FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMS; HIV INFECTIONS--PREVENTION AND CONTROL; MARITAL STATUS; NORTHERN EUROPE; NUPTIALITY; RESEARCH METHODOLOGY; RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR; SCANDINAVIA; STATISTICAL STUDIES; STUDIES; UNMARRIED--WOMEN; VIRAL DISEASES;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ADULT; CONDOMS; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVES, ORAL; DENMARK; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; SEXUAL PARTNERS; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES;

EID: 0030760182     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-7824(97)00032-2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Osler M, David HP, Morgall J, Rasmussen NK. Family planning services delivery. Danish experience. Dan Med Bull 1990;37:95-105.
2. David HP, Morgall JM, Osler M, Rasmussen NK, Jensen B. United States and Denmark: different approaches to health care and family planning. Stud Fam Plann 1990; 21:1-19.
3. Osler M. Contraceptive methods and their efficiency. Ugeskr Laeger 1991;153:562-5.
4. Danish National Board of Health. Contraception and abortions 1991 and 1992. English summary and explanation of tables. Copenhagen, Vitalstatistics.
5. Wielandt HB. Have the AIDS campaigns changed the pattern of contraceptive usage among adolescents? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72:111-5.
6. Kjaer SK, Svare EI, Haugaard BJ, et al. Contraceptive use in random samples of Greenlandic and Danish women-changes from 1986 to 1988. Scand J Soc Med 1991;19:39-43.
7. Forrest JD, Fordyce RR. Women's contraceptive attitudes and use in 1992. Fam Plann Perspect 1993;25: 175-9.
8. Campbell AA, Baldwin W. The response of American women to the threat of AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1991;4: 1133-40.
9. Stigum H, Magnus P, Veierød M, Bakketeig LS. Impact on sexually transmitted disease spread of increased condom use by young females, 1987-1992. Int J Epidemiol 1995;2:813-20.
10. Ketting E, Visser AP. Contraception in The Netherlands: the low abortion rate explained. Patient Educ Couns 1994;23:161-71.
11. Kjaer SK, van den Brule AJC, Bock JE, et al. Human papillomavirus - the most significant risk determinant of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Cancer 1996; 65:601-6.
12. SAS/STAT User's guide. Fourth Ed., Volume 1,2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 1989.
13. Andreasen EE, Hindsø K, Andersen B. Induced abortions correlated to the preceding contraceptive methods. Ugeskr Laeger 1996;158:5928-32.
14. Wielandt H, Hansen UM. Sexual behavior, contraception and unintended pregnancy among young females. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989;68:255-9.
15. Holmgren K. Repeat abortion and contraceptive use. Report from an Interview Study in Stockholm. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1994;37:254-9.
16. Sidenius K, Rasmussen NK, Boesen EM, Pedersen H. Contraceptive habits of women applying for termination of pregnancy. Ugeskr Laeger 1983;145:3721-4.
17. Osler M, Morgall JM, Jensen B. Repeat abortion in Denmark. Dan Med Bull 1992;39:89-91.
18. Ingelhammar E, Möller A, Svanberg B, Tornbom M, Lilja H, Hamberger L. The use of contraceptive methods among women seeking a legal abortion. Contraception 1994;50:143-52.
19. Tydén T, Olsson S, Bjorkelund-Ylander C. Female university students in Sweden: sex, contraception and STDs. Adv Contracept 1991;7:165-71.
20. Sundet JM, Magnus P, Kvalem IL, Grønnesby J, Bakketeig LS. Number of sexual partners and use of condoms in the heterosexual population of Norway - relevance to HIV infection. Health Policy 1989;13:159-67.
21. Johnson AM, Wadsworth J, Wellings K, Field J. Risk reduction strategies. In: Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyle. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994:296-344.
22. Sheeran P, Abraham C. Measurement of condom use in 72 studies of HIV-preventive behaviour: a critical review. Patient Educat Counsel 1994;24:199-216.
23. Skjeldestad FE. Choice of contraceptive modality by women in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993; 72:48-52.
24. Tanfer K, Cubbins LA, Brewster KL. Determinants of contraceptive choice among single women in the United States. Family Plan Perspect 1992;24:155-61.
25. Osler M, Riphagen FE. Contraception Survey: Denmark 1988. Contraception 1990;42:507-21.
26. Lidegaard Ø. Use of oral contraceptives in Denmark from 1980-1990 and smoking habits among fertile women in 1990. Ugeskr Laeger 1993;155:3550-8.
27. Riphagen FE. Contraception in Sweden. Contraception 1989;39:633-42.
28. Santelli JS, Davis M, Celentano DD, Crump AD, Burwell LG. Combined use of condoms with other contraceptive methods among inner-city Baltimore women. Fam Plann Perspect 1995;27:74-8.
29. Jeune B, Wielandt H. Prevalence of smoking and oral contraception in a sample of Danish young women. Scand J Soc Med 1991;19:44-6.