Phylogenetic relationships among Australian elapid snakes: The soft anatomical data reconsidered

Herpetological Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 93-102

  Lee, Michael S Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030759854     PISSN: 02680130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Archibald, J. D. (1994). Metataxon concepts and assessing possible ancestry using phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Zool. 43, 27-40.
2. Backer, H. O., Böhme, W. & Perry, S. F. (1989). Die Lungenmorphologie der Warane (Reptilia: Varanidae) und ihre systematische-stammesgeschichtliche Bedeutung. Bonn. Zool. Beitr. 40, 27-56.
3. Bremer, K. (1988). The limits of amino-acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42, 795-803.
4. Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phytogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783-791.
5. Hutchinson, M. (1990). The generic classification of the Australian terrestrial elapid snakes. Mem. Qld. Mus. 29, 397-405.
6. Lee, M. S. Y. (1995). Historical burden in systematics and the interrelationships of "parareptiles". Biol. Rev. 70, 459-547.
7. Lee, M. S. Y. (1996). The phylogeny of varanoid lizards and the affinities of snakes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B (in press).
8. Mengden, G. (1985). Australian elapid phylogeny: a summary of the chromosomal and electrophoretic data. In Biology of Australian Frogs and Reptiles, 185-192. G. Grigg, R. Shine, and H. Ehmann (eds.). Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney.
9. Rossman, N. J., Rossman, D. A. & Keith, N. K. (1982). Comparative visceral topography of the New World snake tribe Thamnophiini (Colubridae, Natricinae). Tulane Stud. Zool. Bot. 23, 123-164.
10. Sanderson, M. J. (1995) Objections to bootstrapping phylogenies: a critique. Syst. Biol. 44, 299-320.
11. Sanderson, M. J. & Donoghue, M. J. (1989). Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43, 1781-1795.
12. Schwaner, T. D., Baverstock, P. R., Dessauer, H. C. & Mengden, G. A. (1985). Immunological evidence for the phylogenetic relationships of Australian elapid snakes. In Biology of Australian Frogs and Reptiles, 177-184. G. Grigg, R. Shine, and H. Ehmann (eds.). Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney.
13. Shine, R. (1985). Ecological evidence on the phylogeny of Australian elapid snakes. In Biology of Australian Frogs and Reptiles, 255-260. G. Grigg, R. Shine, and H. Ehmann (eds.). Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney.
14. Shine, R. (1994). Allometric patterns in the ecology of Australian snakes. Copeia 1994, 851-867.
15. Slowinski, J. B. (1993). "Unordered" versus "ordered" characters. Syst. Biol. 42, 155-165.
16. Swofford, D. (1993). PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Version 3.1.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champagne IL.
17. Underwood, G. (1967). A Contribution to the Classification of Snakes. British Museum (Natural History) Publications, London. 179pp.
18. Underwood, G. & Stimson, A. F. (1990). A classification of pythons (Serpentes: Pythoninae). J. Zool. 221, 565-603.
19. Wallach, V. (1985). A cladistic analysis of the terrestrial Australian elapidae. In Biology of Australian Frogs and Reptiles, 223-253. G. Grigg, R. Shine, and H. Ehmann (eds.). Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Sydney.
20. Wiley, E. O., Siegel-Causey, D., Brooks, D. R. & Funk, V. A. (1991). The compleat cladist. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ. 19, 1-158.
21. Wilkinson, M. (1992). Ordered versus unordered characters. Cladistics 8, 375-385.
22. Wilkinson, M. (1994). Common cladistic information and its consensus representation: reduced Adams and reduced cladistic consensus trees and profiles. Syst. Biol. 43, 343-368.