Member states and the preferential trade and budget effects of the 1992 cap reform: A note

Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 93-100

  Ackrill, Robert W ^a   Hine, Robert C ^b   Rayner, Anthony J ^b   Suardi, Massimo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL POLICY; BUDGETARY IMPACT; CAP; EUROPEAN UNION; POLICY REFORM;

EUROPE, (WEST);

EID: 0030756706     PISSN: 0021857X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1997.tb01134.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ackrill, R. W. (1992). The EC Budget and Agricultural Policy Reform, With Special Reference to Cereals. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham.
2. Ackrill, R. W., Suardi, M., Hine, R. C. and Rayner, A. J. (1994). The Distributional Effects of the Common Agricultural Policy Between Member States: Budget and Trade Effects. CREDIT Research Paper No. 94/01, Department of Economics, University of Nottingham.
3. Ackrill, R. W., Suardi, M., Hine, R. C. and Rayner, A. J. (1995). The Impact of the MacSharry Reforms on the Distributional Effects of the Common Agricultural Policy Between Member States. CREDIT Research Paper No. 95/16, Department of Economics, University of Nottingham.
4. Agra Europe (1993). EC Farmers Set Aside 8.8% of Base Area in 1993, Agra Europe, No. 1529, February 12, 1993, London: Agra Europe.
5. Allanson, P. (1993). The Impact of the Modulation proposal in the MacSharry Plan for Reform of the Cereals Regime, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 20, 99-109.
6. Ardy, B. (1987). The National Incidence of the European Community Budget, Working Paper No. 21, University of Reading Graduate School of European and International Studies.
7. Ardy, B. (1988). The National Incidence of the European Community Budget, Journal of Common Market Studies, 26, 401-429.
8. Brown, C. (1988). Price Policies of the CAP: Retrospect and Prospect, Report No. 41, Institute of Agricultural Economics, Copenhagen.
9. Buckwell, A. E., Harvey, D. R., Thomson, K. J. and Parton, K. A. (1982). The Costs of the Common Agricultural Policy. London: Croom Helm.
10. Cambridge Economic Policy Group (1979). Policies of the EC, Cambridge Economic Policy Review, 5, 23-30.
11. European Commission (1995). The Agricultural Situation in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
12. MAFF (1994). The Implications for CAP Reform and the GATT Uruguay Round Agreement for EC Agriculture. London: MAFF.
13. Morris, N. (1980). The Common Agricultural Policy, Fiscal Studies, 1, 17-35.
14. Rayner, A. J., Hine, R. C., Ingersent, K. A. and Ackrill, R. W. (1994). Implications of the 1992 CAP Reform: The Cereals Sector. CREDIT Research Paper No. 94/01, Department of Economics, University of Nottingham.
15. Rayner, A. J., Hine, R. C., Ingersent, K. A. and Ackrill, R. W. (1995). Does the CAP Fit the GATT? Cereals and the Uruguay Round, Oxford Agrarian Studies, 23, 117-131.
16. Swinbank, A. (1993). CAP Reform 1992. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31, 359-372.
17. Thomson, K. J. and Munk, K. (1994). The Economic Costs of Agricultural Policy, in European Commission, EC Agricultural Policy for the 21st Century, European Economy Reports and Studies No. 4. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications fo the European Communities.