Attitudes of US neurologists concerning the ethical dimensions of managed care

Neurology

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 4-13

  Bernat, James L ^a,e   Ringel, Steven P ^b   Vickrey, Barbara G ^c   Keran, Christopher ^d  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY   (United States)

^e DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; LEGAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; NEUROLOGY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030756017     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.49.1.4     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Rodwin MA. Conflicts in managed care. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:604-607.
2. Inglehart JK. Physicians and the growth of managed care. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1167-1171.
3. American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Ethical issues in managed care. JAMA 1995;273:330-335.
4. Emanuel EJ, Dubler NN. Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care. JAMA 1995;273:323-329.
5. Weston B, Lauria M. Patient advocacy in the 1990s. N Engl J Med 1996;334:543-544.
6. Chassin MR, Kosecoff JK, Park RE, et al. Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? JAMA 1987;258:2533-2537.
7. Hillman BJ, Joseph CA, Mabry MR, Sunshine JH, Kennedy SD, Noether M. Frequency and costs of diagnostic imaging in office practice: a comparison of self-referring and radiologist-referring physicians. N Engl J Med 1990;323:1604-1608.
8. Ringel SP, Vickrey BG, Rogstad TL. US neurologists: attitudes on the US health care system. Neurology 1996;47:279-287.
9. Vickrey BG, Rogstad TL, Albright CL. U.S. neurologists 1993-1994. Minneapolis: American Academy of Neurology, 1995.
10. Field MJ, Lohr KN, eds. Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
11. Rosenberg J, Greenberg MK. Practice parameters: strategies for survival into the nineties. Neurology 1992;42:1110-1115.
12. Lohr KN. Guidelines for clinical practice: what they are and why they count. J Law Med Ethics 1995;23:49-56.
13. Pauly MV. Practice guidelines: can they save money? Should they? J Law Med Ethics 1995;23:65-74.
14. Steinberg EP, Tunis S, Shapiro D. Insurance coverage for experimental technologies. Health Affairs 1995;14:144-158.
15. Parker CW. Practice guidelines and private insurers. J Law Med Ethics 1995;23:57-61.
16. Halpern J. Can the development of practice guidelines safeguard patient values? J Law Med Ethics 1995;23:75-81.
17. Rosoff AJ. The role of clinical practice guidelines in health care reform. Health Matrix 1995;5:369-396.
18. Pellegrino EP. Interests, obligations, and justice: some notes toward an ethic of managed care. J Clin Ethics 1995;6:312-317.
19. Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. Extreme risk: the new corporate proposition for physicians. N Engl J Med 1995;333: 1706-1708.
20. Orentlicher D. Health care reform and the patient-physician relationship. Health Matrix 1995;5:141-180.
21. Mechanic D, Schlesinger M. The impact of managed care on patients' trust in medical care and their physicians. JAMA 1996;275:1693-1697.
22. Rosenblatt RA. Doctors, HMOs clash at hearing on "gag rules." Los Angeles Times, May 31, 1996; Sect. A1:21.
23. Hellinger FJ. The expanding scope of state legislation. JAMA 1996;276:1065-1070.
24. Weissenstein E. HCFA ruling requires physician disclosure. Modern Healthcare 1996;26:12.
25. Medicaid and Medicaid programs: requirements for physician incentive plans in prepaid health care organizations - HCFA. Final rule with comment period. Fed Regis 1996;61(60): 13430-13450.
26. Orentlicher D. Physician advocacy for patients under managed care. J Clin Ethics 1995;6:333-334.
27. Berenson RA. A physician's view of managed care. Health Affairs 1991;10:106-119.
28. Howe EG. Managed care: "new moves," moral uncertainty, and a radical attitude. J Clin Ethics 1995;6:290-305.
29. Emanuel EJ. Medical ethics in the era of managed care: the need for institutional structures instead of principles for individual cases. J Clin Ethics 1995;6:335-338.
30. Thompson DF. Understanding financial conflicts of interest. N Engl J Med 1993;329:573-576.
31. American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs Conflicts of interest: physician ownership of medical facilities. JAMA 1992;267:2366-2369.
32. Crane TS. The problem of physician self-referral under the Medicare and Medicaid antikickback statute: the Hanlester Network case and the Safe Harbor regulation. JAMA 1992; 268:85-91.
33. Wickline v. California, 228 Cal Reptr 661, 183 Cal App 3d 1175 (1986) Review granted 231 Cal Reptr 560, 727 P.2d 753 (1986); review dismissed 239 Cal Reptr 805, 741 P.2d 613 (1987).
34. Mariner WK. Liability for managed care decisions: the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the uneven playing field. Am J Public Health 1996;86:863-869.
35. Kerr EA, Mittman BS, Hays RD, Siu AL, Leake B, Brook RH. Managed care and capitation in California: how do physicians at financial risk control their own utilization? Ann Intern Med 1995;123:500-504.
36. Morreim EH. Gaming the system: dodging the rules, ruling the dodgers. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:443-447.
37. Novack DH, Detering BJ, Arnold R, Forrow L, Ladinsky M, Pezzullo JC. Physicians' attitudes toward using deception to resolve difficult ethical problems. JAMA 1989;261:2980-2985.
38. Lo B. Resolving ethical dilemmas: a guide for clinicians. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1995:223-229.
39. Swartz K, Brennan TA. Integrated health care, capitated payment, and quality: the role of regulation. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:442-448.
40. Ringel SP, Hughes RL. Evidence-based medicine, critical pathways, practice guidelines, and managed care. Arch Neurol 1996;53:867-871.