Numerical simulation of the effects of three-dimensional roughness on hydrodynamic lubrication: Correlation coefficients

Journal of Tribology

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 315-322

  Lunde, L ^a   Tonder K ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDRODYNAMICS; LUBRICATION; ROUGHNESS; SIMULATION-NUMERICAL;

EID: 0030752873     PISSN: 07424787     EISSN: 15288897     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.2833216     Document Type: Editorial

References (16)

1. Box, Hunter and Hunter, H., 1978, Statistics for Experimenters, Wiley, New York.
2. Christensen, H., 1969-70 “Stochastic Models for Hydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces,” Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs., Vol. 184, Part 1, no. 55, pp. 1013-1026.
3. Christensen, H., andTpnder, K., 1969, “Tribology of Rough Surfaces: Stochastic Models of Hydrodynamic Lubrication,” 1969-11 SINTEF Rep. No. 10/69-18.
4. Elrod, H. G., 1979, “A General Theory for Laminar Lubrication With Reynolds Roughness,” Trans. ASME, Vol. 101, Jan. pp. 8-14.
5. Hu, Y. Z., and T0nder, K., 1992, “Simulation of 3-D Random Surface by 2D Digital Filter and Fourier Analysis,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact., Vol. 32, No. 1/2, pp. 83-90.
6. Lunde, L., and Tpnder, K., 1994, “Numerical Simulation of the Effects of Three Dimensional Roughness on Hydrodynamic Lubrication-Effect of Boundary Conditions,” Proc. of the 4th Int. Trib. Conference Austrib’94 Australia, pp. 113-118.
7. Mitsuya, Y., and Fukui, S., 1986, “Stokes Roughness Effects on Hydrodynamic Lubrication. Part 1. Comparison Between Incompressible and Compressible Lubrication Films,” ASME Journal of Tribology, Apr., Vol. 108, pp. 151-158.
8. Patir, N., 1978, “A Numerical Procedure for Random Generation of Rough Surfaces,” Wear, Vol. 47, No. 2, Apr., pp. 263-277.
9. Patir, N., and Cheng, H. S., 1978, “An Average Flow Model for Determining Effects of Three-Dimensional Roughness on Partial Hydrodynamic Lubrication.” ASME Journal of Lubrication Technology, Vol. 100, No. 1, Jan., pp. 1217.
10. Peklenik, J. 1967, “New Developments in Surface Characterization and Measurement by Means of Random Process Analysis,” Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs., Vol. 182, Part 3k, pp. 108-126.
11. Reddi, M. M., 1969, “Finite Element Solution of the Incompressible Lubrication Problem,” ASME Journal of Lubrication Technology, Vol. 91, No. 3, July, pp. 524-533.
12. Sun, D. C., and Chen, K. K., 1977, “First Effects of Stokes Roughness on Hydrodynamic Lubrication,” Trans. ASME Journal of Lubrication Technology, Vol. 99, 1, pp. 2-9.
13. Teale, J. L., and A. O. Lebeck, 1980, “An Evaluation of the Average Flow Model for Surface Roughness Effects in Lubrication,” Trans. ASME, Vol. 102, July, pp. 360-367.
14. Tripp, J. H., 1983, “Surface Roughness Effects in Hydrodynamic Lubrication: The Flow Factor Method,” Trans. ASME, Vol. 105, July, pp. 458-465.
15. Tpnder, K., 1980, “Simulation of the Lubrication of Isotropically Rough Surfaces,” ASLE Trans, Vol. 23, July.
16. Tpnder, K., 1984, “Roughness Effects on Thin-Film Gas Lubrication-a State-Of-The-Art Review,” ASLE Special Publication 16, pp. 183-192.